NUR- 590 Literature Evaluation Table

Criteria	Article 1	Article 2	Article 3	Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article	Asamrew, N., Endris, A. A., & Tadesse, M. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jeph/2020/2473469/	sheim, A., Nilsen, S. M., Carlsen, F., Næss-Pleym, L. E., Uleberg, O., Dale, J., et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31135613/	Boehm, L., & Petty, K. https://vocera.com/sites/default/files/resources/CXO_Survey_2016_Report_Vocera_Experience_Innovation_Network.pdf	Boulos, M. N., & Berry, G. https://ij-healthgeographics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1476-072X-11-25
Introduction	The article is about the healthcare industry going through a rapid transition to cater to the needs and demands of the patient population. The paper shows that healthcare quality has become a prevalent issue discussed across the globe. However, current studies have showcased that the healthcare personnel view that patients are better positioned to judge; who evaluates and gives inputs to aid in the overall enhancement of quality health care provision via rectifying the system weaknesses (Asamrew et al., 2020).	The study focuses on a reduced length of stay in medical emergence department patients, a prospective controlled study on emergency physician staffing. It is crucial to acknowledge that patients, emergency department staff, and hospital managers experience long hours of emergency department patients. As a result, it had triggered considerable crowds in the emergency departments. That is why the articles aim to devise effective ways to reduce the number of hours that the mentioned group would stay in the emergency room.	The paper addressed the rise of the healthcare chief experience officer. It looked at the 2016 study concerning patient’s experience to human experience. The study displayed various recommendations such as attention to physicians, nurses, and other relevant care provider’s well-being to combat initiative fatigue and drive sustainable changes.	Real-time relocating systems have become a vital element of several existing ubiquitous location-aware systems. RTLS are local systems that help identify and track the location of assets and persons in real(or near-real-time). It entails specialized fixed readers that receive wireless signs from ID badges connected to objects of interest or people.
Search Methods	Use of Zipcodes	Use of zip codes	Geographical data	Geographical information
Synthesis of the Literature	The study was conducted in Black Lion Specialized Hospital (Addis Ababa), Ethiopia. It aimed to measure patient satisfaction in a specialized health facility (Boulos & Berry 2012). In the hospitals in Addis Ababa, the healthcare services are scarce, and majorly, they are of poor quality. The challenges depict the socioeconomic status of the country. However, the nation has taken significant steps to improve its healthcare firms and the quality of health service delivery over recent years.	Emergency department crowding a point in time. It was essential to identify a prevalence study to evaluate the degree of physical crowding, including staff shortage. The research centered on the consecutive patients managed in a medical emergency department by internal medicine residents during the evening shift. The study utilized an Experimental design whereby relevant information was collected on patients managed prior(n=200) and after (n=160) the addition of a second physician on the shift (Boehm & Petty 2016).	The study focused on chief executive officers’ rise in number in the healthcare facilities. It was noted that experienced leaders possess the ear of the C-suite. The study also highlighted that engagement with the CEO is fundamental to success and that experience triggers parity with quality, safety, and performance improvement.	The study aims to look at RTLS elements and technologies. RTLS are local systems that help identify and track the location of assets and persons in real(or near-real-time). It entails specialized fixed readers that receive wireless signs from ID badges connected to objects of interest or people. It is crucial to note that RTLS location data does not entail complete information of speed, direction, the spatial orientation of tracked objects or people. Nevertheless, it can play a considerable role in emergency response in the healthcare sector and health facilities in general. Also, at home, it provides a substantial benefit while integrating RTLS solutions.
Comparison of the articles	The article used quantitative research, which involved 398 participants.	Unlike the first article, the present research followed an experimental design to conduct its study.	The article utilized a mixed research design as opposed to the first two. Besides, the paper also focused on the CEO compared to the first two, which centered on a patient’s well-being.	The article is different from the first three in terms of the method used. It focused on RTLS components and technologies and how they can be applied in the healthcare system.
Suggestion for Future Research	There should be an improvement on quality connected to timely and valuable feedback from the participants and other related people. It will answer few questions on whether the initial research would have achieved its intended goals.	The research should expand its objectives and utilize another research design to extract relevant information from the chosen participants, such as a survey or mixed study to get intended results.	There should be a practical engagement with the stakeholders like the physicians, board members, patients, and families to express their concerns and possible adjustments. Future research should also focus on the broader vision across the continuum of care, especially in the selected area. It will ensure effective improvement, and focus will be directed to the inpatient hospital surrounding.	Future studies should focus on RTLS drawbacks and how healthcare workers can overcome them (Boulos & Rhoads 2011). How can RTLS help provide prompt feedback, especially those patients with critical illnesses like Alzheimer’s disease.
Conclusion	According to the findings, 46% of the participants in Addis Ababa expressed their satisfaction with healthcare services, and 37.7% were neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. However, the general patient satisfaction was recorded as low than the other healthcare facilities in the nation, including a comparison with services given in the healthcare.	An additional physician fundamentally decreased the period of stay of medical emergency department outpatients.	The study concluded that experience is crucial and is perceived as a strategic priority and that effective engagement with chief executive officers is essential for guaranteed success. For it contributes a lot to quality, safety, and performance improvement in the healthcare sector. Also that more than 39% of experienced leaders report directly to CEO or the president.	The study concluded by highlighting few recommendations such that the healthcare facilities should focus on enhancing the technology in modest procedural changes on behalf of its users. Also, the selection and procurement personnel should focus on achievable and illustrate real-world benefits like cost savings, enhanced efficiency, staffing, and patient satisfaction.

Criteria	Article 5	Article 6	Article 7	Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article	Drazen, E., & Rhoads, J. https://www.chcf.org/publication/using-tracking-tools-to-improve-patient-flow-in-hospitals/	Heath, S. https://patientengagementhit.com/features/patient-satisfaction-and-hcahps-what-it-means-for-providers	Prakash, B. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3047732/	Son, H., & Yom, Y.-H. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jjns.12132
Introduction	The study aims at utilizing tracking tools to enhance patient flow in hospitals. It was evident that healthcare facilities in the US go through financial and operational stress. The followed a qualitative design, and some of the tools proposed for improvement include RTLS, which will help increase patient flow and essential tract data.	As the healthcare sector transits towards patient-centered approaches, healthcare workers need to comprehend patient satisfaction techniques and practices. Patient satisfaction involves how sick clients get happy with healthcare services, including inside and outside the doctor’s office.	Patient Satisfaction is critical and commonly used indicator for assessing the quality of healthcare. However, practice in the healthcare system has developed over many decades, such as establishing corporate hospitals combined with the latest facilities, increasing litigations for unsatisfying feedback, and others. Those factors have triggered a challenging profile for the healthcare industry.	The aims to look at the factors impacting satisfaction with emergency department medical service: Patients’ and their companions’ perspectives using a cross-sectional design.
Search Methods	Through specified and manually enter the area of interest by choosing specific search terms.	Use of Zipcode	Using search terms and manually typing to locate articles with the same content interested in.	Using search terms and manually typing to locate articles with the same content interested in.
Synthesis of the Literature	Examine the variation of the relevance of tools such as RTLS to patient care. It because the US experiences both financial and operational stress (Drazen & Rhoads 2011). Specialists have projected the need for new bed capacity to rise 20 percent by 2012.	Examining patient satisfaction and HCAHPS: What it means for a care provider (Health, 2016). The study highlighted that technology advancement that introduces unique tools for services could help satisfy patient’s needs and concerns. In addition, technology help boosts patient satisfaction by improving efficiency and developing effective strategies to enhance patient satisfaction.	The literature review talked of particular features of dermatological practice. The second issue involved evaluating the quality of health care (Prakash, 2010). The article centered on patient satisfaction, its evaluation, and its influence on health care delivery concerning dermatological and esthetic practice.	The study examines personal determinants that impact satisfaction with medical services at the emergency department and compares the factors that influence patient satisfaction compared with their companions.
Comparison of article	The articles hold similarities with article four due to their focus on the tools like RTLS and their effectiveness on healthcare and patient care.	The article was related to the first two articles, focusing on patient’s wellness and satisfaction.	The article also related to article 6, 1, 2, that talks about patient’s satisfaction. But the present study assesses the unique features of dermatological practice.	The article relates with 1, 2, 6, 7, although this article 8 expands the content further by highlighting the determinants that might influence satisfaction, especially medical services.
Suggestion for future	It was evident from the article that there were benefits in developing patient flow solutions, for they generated positive outcomes. But I would suggest that future research focus on the feedback of patients who utilized the tools and how they impacted them.	No suggestions for future research. The information was enough and clear for comprehension.	The future study should focus on patient satisfaction at different levels of care such as mental status, physical health, and emotional health—also, patient satisfaction in terms of intervention utilized, whether pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention.	The future study should focus on patient satisfaction on different levels of care such as mental status, physical health, and emotional health. and utilize mixed methods to evaluate all the determinants.
Conclusion	The tools improve the patient’s capability to enhance the patient’s flow. As a result, the healthcare facilities reported a decreased number of patients who visited for long periods and reduced the number of patients leaving without getting seen. The study, therefore, concluded that patient flow solutions such as RTLS have improved patient and staff satisfaction.	The study concluded that healthcare givers ensure the patients are well satisfied despite the technical quality of care delivered. The study followed a survey design which proved that 50% of patient participants expressed their satisfaction with care, 28% described their dissatisfaction, and 125% were neither satisfied nor unsatisfied.

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
NUR-590	NUR-590-O500	Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Presentation	120.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%)	3: Satisfactory (88.00%)	4: Good (92.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	100.0%
Introduction	5.0%	An introduction is not included.	The introduction omits key aspects of the PICOT and fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation.	The introduction generally presents the PICOT statement and most of the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation.	The introduction is adequate. The PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and PICOT statement for the presentation are discussed.	The introduction is succinct, captures the attention of the audience, clearly identifies PICOT statement and the fundamental aspects of the evidence-based practice project proposal that will be the main talking points and for the presentation.
Organizational and Cultural Readiness	10.0%	The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is not included. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final	The discussion on the organizational culture and readiness is incomplete. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final	The organizational culture and readiness are generally discussed and provide insight into some of the challenges faced by the organization.	The organizational culture and readiness are adequately discussed and provide the necessary insight into the organization challenges.	The organizational culture and readiness are thoroughly discussed and provide insight into the organization challenges.
Problem Statement and Literature Review	15.0%	The problem statement is not clearly stated. Research from the literature review is not included. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final	The problem statement outlines the issue. Support from the research from the literature review is inconsistent. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final	The problem statement summarizes the issue and uses evidence-based support from some of the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review provides general support overall.	The problem describes the issue using evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide adequate rationale and support throughout.	The problem statement is consistent throughout the presentation and concisely describes the issue using strong evidence-based support from the literature review to rationalize and justify the problem. The research from the literature review is current, relevant, and used to provide excellent rationale and support throughout.
Change Model or Framework	10.0%	The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are not described.	The selected model or framework is and its application to the proposed implementation are only partially described.	The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are generally described.	The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are adequately described.	The selected model or framework and its application to the proposed implementation are thoroughly described.
Implementation Plan	10.0%	The implementation plan is not described.	The implementation plan is only partially described.	The implementation plan is generally described and provides an overall outline for the various aspects.	The implementation plan is adequately described and provides the details for the various aspects.	The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
Evaluation Plan	10.0%	The evaluation plan is not described.	The evaluation plan is only partially described.	The evaluation plan is outlined and provides general information for most aspects.	The evaluation plan is adequately described and provides key information for the various aspects.	The evaluation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects.
Conclusion	5.0%	A conclusion is not presented.	The conclusion mentions some aspects of the presentation, but there are some key aspects missing.	The conclusion outlines the broad aspects of the presentation.	The conclusion summarizes the key points of the presentation in a concise manner.	The conclusion is short, clear and summarizes the key points of the presentation in a powerful and memorable way.
Research	5.0%	No outside sources were used to support the assignment.	Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.	Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.	Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.	Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Presentation PowerPoint, speaker notes, Loom voice over or video.	10.0%	The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.	The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements.	The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.	The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.	The submission is presented effectively, and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts.
Aesthetic Quality	5.0%	Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality.	Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present.	Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear.	Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message.	Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident.
Synthesis	5.0%	Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable.	Synthesis integrates ideas inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical.	Synthesis integrates ideas but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing.	Synthesis integrates ideas to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified.	Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified.
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Who We Are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NUR- 590 Literature Evaluation Table

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Final

Guarantee
NUR- 590 Literature Evaluation Table

Zero Plagiarism
On-time delivery
A-Grade Papers
Free Revision
24/7 Support
100% Confidentiality
Professional Writers

Services Offered

Custom paper writing
Question and answers
Essay paper writing
Editing and proofreading
Plagiarism removal services
Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

NUR- 590 Literature Evaluation Table