Health Care Values and Ethics-Ethical Dilemma Scenario

Health Care Values and Ethics-Ethical Dilemma Scenario

Instructions

REN1 — REN1 TASK 1: ETHICAL DILEMMAS ESSAY

HEALTHCARE VALUES ETHICS — C426

PRFA — REN1

TASK OVERVIEW SUBMISSIONS EVALUATION REPORT

COMPETENCIES


3048.1.4 : Ethical Dilemmas

The graduate evaluates ethical dilemmas in healthcare.

INTRODUCTION


Introduction: Ethical and legal problems arise in healthcare organizations when the decision-making capacity of an elderly patient is uncertain, particularly when the patient’s decisions are at odds with the rest of the family’s preferences. The scenario provided here is about this type of situation.

This performance assessment will provide you with experience in sorting through the sometimes-competing issues related to a scenario such as the one described, as well as experience in formulating actions that can help guide a healthcare organization through ethical problems that arise in caring for elderly patients.

Note: Students may rely on conversations and notes gleaned from cohort lectures and Boot Camp.

SCENARIO


You are the healthcare administrator at a local hospital. A social worker has come to you to discuss the case of Jamilah Shah, a patient who has recently been admitted to the hospital. Jamilah is a 90-year-old woman who was brought to the hospital after collapsing at the side of her bed. EKG and lab tests revealed a heart attack.

More than 40 years ago, Jamilah emigrated with her wealthy husband (now deceased) and their three sons from Turkey to the United States. Jamilah was a homemaker and learned only basic English, but her children are fluent English speakers. The children are now all in their 50s. The family retains Turkish culture and norms, including the sons acting as patriarchs for the family. Even though Jamilah is highly educated (in Turkey she was trained as a lawyer), the sons make many of the family decisions. Two of the three children are in successful careers. The remaining child, the youngest son, Bashir, owns a small market and struggles financially.

Until yesterday, the day of her admission, Jamilah resided in an extended care facility (ECF), where she has lived since her husband’s death. She reportedly has severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and adult-onset diabetes mellitus.

Jamilah has no advance directives on file. Because of her communication difficulties, the emergency department physician started her on anticoagulants while trying to contact her next of kin. The ECF sent paperwork to the hospital, listing Bashir as the emergency contact. Bashir was contacted and is now at the hospital with his two brothers. He has informed the care team that he is the decision maker, and he wants his mother to have a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order with no intervention of any kind other than comfort care.

The social worker has come to you with concerns that this decision may not reflect Jamilah’s wishes. When the social worker was visiting with Jamilah alone, Jamilah reached for her hand and said, “Please help me. I want to live.” The social worker shares concerns about the interactions observed between Jamilah and her sons, stating that the relationships seem unsupportive. The hospital’s ethics committee has not yet been involved. The social worker also reports that the emergency physician requested a cardiology consultation, which was just completed. The consultant documented that “Because the family has requested only comfort care, and due to the patient’s multiple comorbidities, the patient will be managed medically, with no intervention, and will not receive cardiac catheterization or be considered for coronary bypass surgery.” If nothing is done, Jamilah will likely die within days.

REQUIREMENTS


Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The similarity report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Note: Complete these prompts by using complete sentences.

Note: The web links “Advance Directives” and “Determining Competency for Medical Decisions” found below may be used to assist you in completing this assessment.

A.   Write an essay (suggested length of 5–7 pages, not including attachments) analyzing the scenario by doing the following:

1.   Describe three potential ethical dilemmas presented in the scenario: one related to autonomy, one related to beneficence, and one related to non-maleficence.

a.   Analyze legal implications associated with each of the potential ethical dilemmas described.

2.   In response to Bashir’s demands for only comfort care, discuss each of the following three courses of action in the scenario as it relates to each ethical dilemma.

•   Course of action 1: follow Bashir’s wishes

•   Course of action 2: refuse to follow Bashir’s wishes

•   Course of action 3: briefly delay the decision to gather additional information and other perspectives

a.   Choose and justify the correct course of action (in response to Bashir’s demands for only comfort care).

b.   Choose one of the courses of action from part A2 that you did not justify in part A2a and explain how possible consequences show that it is not the correct course of action.

3.   Putting yourself in the role of a healthcare administrator, describe in the essay what should happen next within the scenario by doing the following:

a.   Describe two resources that could have made or could still make Jamilah’s wishes clearer.

i.   Explain how each resource could have made Jamilah’s wishes clearer.

4.   Create three policy recommendations that you could make as an administrator to help your employees and the facility’s medical staff handle similar situations in the future.

a.   Justify each policy recommendation.

 

B.   Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

 

C.   Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

File Restrictions

File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z

RUBRIC


A1:POTENTIAL ETHICAL DILEMMAS

NOT EVIDENT

Descriptions of 3 potential ethical dilemmas—1 related to autonomy, 1 related to beneficence, and 1 related to non-maleficence—are not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Descriptions of 3 potential ethical dilemmas—1 related to autonomy, 1 related to beneficence, and 1 related to non-maleficence—are provided, but the descriptions do not have a significant and demonstrable relationship to the scenario.

COMPETENT

Descriptions of 3 potential ethical dilemmas—1 related to autonomy, 1 related to beneficence, and 1 related to non-maleficence—are provided. The descriptions are accurate and directly relate to the scenario.

A1A:LEGAL IMPLICATIONS

NOT EVIDENT

An analysis of the legal implications associated with each of the potential ethical dilemmas discussed in part A1 is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

An analysis of the legal implications for each of the potential ethical dilemmas in part A1 is provided, but the analyses are partly or completely incorrect.

COMPETENT

An analysis of the legal implications for each of the potential dilemmas in part A1 is provided, and the analyses are correct and consistent throughout the response.

A2:COURSES OF ACTION

NOT EVIDENT

Discussions of each of the three given courses of action are not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Discussions of each of the three given courses of action are provided, but the discussions are not accurate or do not directly relate to the scenario.

COMPETENT

Discussions of each of the three given courses of action are provided. The descriptions are accurate and directly relate to the scenario.

A2A:JUSTIFICATION OF COURSE OF ACTION

NOT EVIDENT

A justification of which of the courses of action is correct is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The correct course of action is chosen, but the justification for that course of action is not logical, not appropriate for the position of a healthcare administrator, or not relevant to the scenario.

COMPETENT

The justification for the correct course of action is logical, appropriate for the position of a healthcare administrator, and relevant to the scenario.

A2B:EXPLANATION OF WRONG COURSE OF ACTION

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of how possible consequences show that the course of action chosen is not correct is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

An explanation of how possible consequences show that the course of action chosen is not correct is provided, but the explanation is not logical, not appropriate for a healthcare administrator, or not relevant to the scenario.

COMPETENT

An explanation of how possible consequences show that the course of action chosen is not correct is provided, and the explanation is logical, appropriate for a healthcare administrator, and relevant to the scenario.

A3A:RESOURCE

NOT EVIDENT

Descriptions of 2 resources that could be used to make Jamilah’s wishes more clear are not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Descriptions of 2 resources that could be used to make Jamilah’s wishes more clear are provided, but the descriptions of 1 or both of the resources is not accurate.

COMPETENT

Descriptions of 2 resources that could be used to make Jamilah’s wishes more clear are accurately provided.

A3AI:RESOURCE EXPLANATION

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of why the resources in part A3a would be helpful is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

An explanation of why the resources described in part A3a would make Jamilah’s wishes more clear is provided, but the explanation of 1 or more of the resources is not logical.

COMPETENT

The explanation of why each resource described in part A3a would make Jamilah’s wishes more clear is logical.

A4:POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

NOT EVIDENT

The 3 policy recommendations are not created.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The 3 policy recommendations are created, but 1 or more of those recommendations would not be helpful to employees and staff in similar situations in the future.

COMPETENT

The 3 policy recommendations that could help employees and medical staff handle similar situations in the future are created.

A4A:POLICY RECOMMENDATION JUSTIFICATION

NOT EVIDENT

Justifications for 1 or more of the policy recommendations are not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

A justification is provided for each of the policy recommendations, but 1 or more of the justifications are inaccurate or not relevant.

COMPETENT

The justifications provided for each of the policy recommendations are accurate and relevant.

B:APA SOURCES

NOT EVIDENT

The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style.

COMPETENT

The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style.

C:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION

NOT EVIDENT

Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.

COMPETENT

Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Who We Are 

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Health Care Values and Ethics-Ethical Dilemma Scenario

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Health Care Values and Ethics-Ethical Dilemma Scenario

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. Health Care Values and Ethics-Ethical Dilemma Scenario

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

  • Guarantee
    Health Care Values and Ethics-Ethical Dilemma Scenario
    Health Care Values and Ethics-Ethical Dilemma Scenario

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper