SOCW6351 week 2 Dq2

 SOCW6351 week 2 Dq2

SOCW6351 week 2 Dq2
Discussion 2: The
Research Approval Process
The early years of the
20th century were host to a number of unethical research studies. Research
involving the way that a young child reacts to and generalizes fear responses,
medical experiments conducted in concentration camps, and observing the way people
respond to authority were just a few of the most famous experiments whose
byproduct was placing clients in physical pain and/or mental anguish. Since
then, it has been recognized that research subjects need to be protected from
the flagrant disregard of researchers. This week, you consider the guidelines
in Walden University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) document,
“Research Ethics FAQs for Doctoral Students in the Clinical/Intervention
Fields: Practical Tips for Avoiding Delays and Problems in the Research
Approval Process.”
By Day 5
Post a description of two ways the guidelines in
Walden University’s IRB document may impact the selection of a research
population, research setting, and/or research design. Please use the resources
to support your answer.
By Day 7
Respond to a colleague’s post in one of the following ways:
1. Expand upon your colleague’s post regarding ways
that the IRB’s ethical guidelines may impact his or her study.
2. Explain an insight you gained from this week’s
Resources that addresses a topic in your colleague’s post.
Please use the resources
to support your post.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria

Click here  to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: