Week 5 Assignment – Implementation Into Practice
Week 5 Assignment – Implementation Into Practice
Details: The Institute of Medicine set a goal that 90% of health care decisions should be evidence-based by 2020. At best guess, less than 10% of decisions use best evidence. Bridging the gap between research, findings, and practice implementation is one strategy to meet this important goal. This assignment will help you to find gaps that may be used for your project.
General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
- Review the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) website to complete the assignment.
- Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please Review the rubric prior to the beginning to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- Use at least two additional scholarly research sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
- You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions: Select a practice from the AHRQ comparative effectiveness research site and write a 1,000-1,250 word paper that looks at a gap that exists between research findings and the implementation of those findings in practice. Include the following:
- Discuss the practice.
- Assess to what extent the practice is being implemented.
- Evaluate the barriers to implementation into practice.
- Propose ways to overcome the barriers.
- Discuss the resources available on the selected site to inform translation.
Portfolio Practice Hours: Practice immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement which reminds you, the learner, to enter in a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice immersion assignment is 10. You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network. To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the references section of your paper:
Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-820 I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.
KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
DNP 820 Week 5 Assignment: Implementation Into Practice
Implementation Into Practice
| 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% | 2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00% | 3 Satisfactory 79.00% | 4 Good 87.00% | 5 Excellent 100.00% | ||
| 70.0 %Content | ||||||
| 10.0 %Discuss the Practice | Discussion of the practice is not presented. | Discussion of the practice is presented but is incomplete. | Discussion of the practice is presented but at a cursory level. | Discussion of the practice is clearly presented and convincing. Sources cited are from current scholarly but some outdated sources. | Discussion of the practice is clearly presented and perceptive. Sources cited are from current scholarly sources. | |
| 15.0 %Assess to what extent the practice is being implemented | Assessment of the extent the practice is being implemented is not presented. | Assessment of the extent the practice is being implemented is presented but is incomplete. | Assessment of the extent the practice is being implemented is presented but at a cursory level. | Assessment of the extent the practice is being implemented is clearly presented and convincing. Sources cited are from current scholarly but some outdated sources. | Assessment of the extent the practice is being implemented is clearly presented and perceptive. Sources cited are from current scholarly sources. | |
| 15.0 %Evaluate the Barriers to Implementation Into Practice | Evaluation of the barriers to implementation into practice is not presented. | Evaluation of the barriers to implementation into practice is presented but is incomplete. | Evaluation of the barriers to implementation into practice is presented but at a cursory level. | Evaluation of the barriers to implementation into practice is clearly presented and convincing. Sources cited are from current scholarly but some outdated sources. | Evaluation of the barriers to implementation into practice is clearly presented and perceptive. Sources cited are from current scholarly sources. | |
| 15.0 %Propose Ways to Overcome the Barriers | Proposed ways to overcome the barriers are not presented. | Proposed ways to overcome the barriers are presented but are incomplete. | Proposed ways to overcome the barriers are presented but at a cursory level. | Proposed ways to overcome the barriers are clearly presented and convincing. Sources cited are from current scholarly but some outdated sources. | Proposed ways to overcome the barriers are clearly presented and perceptive. Sources cited are from current scholarly sources. | |
| 15.0 %Discuss the Resources Available on the Selected Site to Inform Translation | Discussion of the resources available on the selected site to inform translation is not presented. | Discussion of the resources available on the selected site to inform translation is presented but is incomplete. | Discussion of the resources available on the selected site to inform translation is presented but at a cursory level. | Discussion of the resources available on the selected site to inform translation is clearly presented and convincing. Sources cited are from current scholarly but some outdated sources. | Discussion of the resources available on the selected site to inform translation is clearly presented and perceptive. Sources cited are from current scholarly sources. | |
| 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | DNP 820 Week 5 Assignment – Implementation Into Practice | |||||
| 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |
| 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |
| 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |
| 10.0 %Format | ||||||
| 5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |
| 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |
| 100 %Total Weightage | ||||||