NUR 3036 Quantitative Research Article Critique

by
with no comment
Nursing Papers

NUR 3036 Quantitative Research Article Critique

NUR 3036 Quantitative Research Article Critique

Rubric Template

Rubric Topic: Quantitative Research Article

 

A (100-90)

B (89-80)

C (79-70)

F (< 69)

Introduction

(5 points)

 

 

The topic is introduced, and the groundwork is laid as to the direction of the report.

Readers are aware of the overall problem, challenge, or topic that is to be examined.

The topic is not introduced, and the groundwork is not laid as to the direction of the paper.

Does not adequately convey introduce the topic. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed. Lacks adequate theses statement

 

Literature Search

(20 points)

 

 

Demonstrates a sophisticated critique of the sources reviewed; shows a deep understanding of the breadth of the subject.

Demonstrates an accomplished critique of the sources reviewed.

Demonstrates a less than acceptable critique of the sources reviewed. Inappropriate use of search terms.

Demonstrates unacceptable critique of the sources reviewed. Inappropriate use of search terms.

Inappropriate use of search sites (e.g. Goggle, Yahoo vs. PubMed, CINAHL).

Determination of Level of Evidence

(25 points)

 

 

Accurately determined the appropriate level of evidence using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal tool.

Identified the level, however the one or two of the elements related to independent variable, control group, or random assignment was not appropriately identified.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Level of evidence misidentified completely, however an attempt was made to justify the level’s selection.

Complete misidentification of level of evidence and justification for level.

Quality of Evidence

(25 points)

 

 

Accurately determined the appropriate quality of evidence using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal tool. At least 90% of the component questions were accurately identified and answered with the appropriate “yes”, “no”, or “NA”.

Determined the appropriate quality of evidence using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal tool. At least 80% of the component questions were accurately identified and answered with the appropriate “yes”, “no”, or “NA”.

Determined the appropriate quality of evidence using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal tool. At least 70% of the component questions were accurately identified and answered with the appropriate “yes”, “no”, or “NA”.

Determined the appropriate quality of evidence using the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal tool. Less than 69% of the component questions were accurately identified and answered with the appropriate “yes”, “no”, or “NA”.

Summary

(5 points)

 

 

The summary is well written, insightful and summarizes all the relevant sections of the paper.

The summary section includes some discussion related to each section of the critique, leveling and quality of the research article.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The summary has elements of the relevant section; however, the flow and connection of each section lack a cohesive writing approach.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The summary is completely unfocused and lacks continuity for supporting the proposed level and quality of the research article.

APA and Grammar

(10 points)

 

 

Uses APA format accurately and consistently.

Sentences are clear, concise, and direct; tone is appropriate.

 

Grammatical skills are strong with almost no errors per page. Correct use of APA format per 6th edition, and including:

Clear introduction and conclusion, overviewing and reviewing paper’s main topics

Use of headings according to APA

Appropriately formatted in-text citations and reference page

Appropriately formatted title page.

Uses APA format with no more than 3 minor violations.

 

 

 

 

 

Sentences are generally clear, concise, and direct; tone is appropriate. Grammatical skills are competent with very few errors per page. Correct use of APA format when assigned.

Uses APA format with greater than 3 minor violations.

 

 

 

 

 

Sentences are occasionally wordy or ambiguous; tone is too informal. Grammatical skills are adequate with few errors per page. Adequate use of APA format when assigned.

Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA format.

 

 

 

 

 

Gramm

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Who We Are 

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NUR 3036 Quantitative Research Article Critique

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

  • Guarantee
    NUR 3036 Quantitative Research Article Critique
    NUR 3036 Quantitative Research Article Critique

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Comments are closed.