NRS-493-RS5 Practice Experience Conference Form

NRS-493-RS5 Practice Experience Conference Form

NRS-493-RS5 Practice Experience Conference Form

Practice Experience Conference Form (Mid-Conference)

Pre-/mid-/ and post- conference or evaluation between students, faculty, and preceptors are mandatory for students enrolled in the RN-BSN Capstone and Practicum course. Conferences may be conducted face-to-face or via synchronous technology.

Overall Course Objectives :

This course provides students the opportunity to integrate what they have learned in the program in a practicum experience. Students are expected to integrate nursing knowledge, knowledge gained throughout the program, leadership, and advanced critical-thinking and problem-solving skills in the development of a comprehensive and professional capstone project change proposal.

Student Specific Objectives: Students are responsible for completing all experiences as mandated for program.

A pre-conference will occur prior to the start of the clinical practice experience. This meeting is intended for the student and preceptor to review course and student-specific learning objectives: the roles, responsibilities, and expectations of student and preceptor during this practicum experience. All faculty and preceptor contact information will be given to each party per the student. Any course or program information requested by the preceptor will be provided by the student. Faculty will review submitted document.

A mid-conference/evaluation will occur at the mid-point of the course. This meeting is intended for the student, faculty, and preceptor to discuss student progress toward meeting the competencies in the clinical evaluation tool (CET). Progress toward completing the written capstone project change proposal will also be discussed with faculty recommendations for project development

A post-conference/evaluation will occur at the end of the practicum experience. This is intended for the student and preceptor to review and evaluate all competencies and validate that all areas are “at meets expectations” prior to progression. Faculty will provide final review and evaluation after conferring with preceptor.

Proposed Practicum Experience (Brief Description of Experience Identified by Student), Practicum goals/objectives reviewed in pre-meeting.

Preceptor contact information (email or phone): _______________________________________

 

Preceptor Signature: __________________________________ Date: _______________

 

Student Signature: ____________________________________ Date: _______________

 

Review progress towards meeting goals/ objectives with rationales provided to student at mid-term conference.

 

Preceptor Signature: __________________________________ Date: _______________

 

Student Signature: ____________________________________ Date: _______________

 

Review progress towards meeting goals/ objectives with rationales provided to student at end of rotation.

 

Preceptor Signature: __________________________________ Date: _______________

 

Student Signature: ____________________________________ Date: _______________

Midterm Evaluation of Student

Students are required to initiate a mid-conference that will occur during Topic 5, using the “Practice Experience Conference Form (Mid-Conference)” resource. This conference is intended for the student, preceptor, and faculty to discuss progress toward meeting the learning goals and course objectives contained in the Individual Success Plan (ISP). Progress toward completing the written capstone project will also be discussed, including faculty recommendations for project development. Student progress will be documented on the Clinical Evaluation Tool (CET), which is submitted in LoudCloud prior to the conference. The CET will be discussed during the mid-conference and graded in LoudCloud by the faculty after the mid-conference. If the student receives an “Unacceptable” or “Below Expectations” in any category, the student will remediate for that category of the CET.

Strategic Plan Summary

Assess the culture of the organization for potential challenges in incorporating the nursing practice intervention. Use this assessment when creating the strategic plan.

Write a 150-250 word strategic plan defining how the nursing practice intervention will be implemented in the capstone project change proposal.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

NRS-493: Clinical Experience Remediation

Student Name: __________________________________ Date: ____________

Instructor: ______________________________

Preceptor: ________________________________

Clinical evaluations are submitted at the midterm conference and in the final week. Individualized remediation plans are a system of support to help students improve in the areas identified requiring improvement when performance is assessed against learning the learning objectives of the course. Students who receive a “Below Expectations” or “Unacceptable” on any competency on the midterm evaluation will be required to complete a remediation plan with their preceptor and submit this remediation form.

*Students must meet all clinical expectations of the course, earn a passing grade on all benchmark assignments, and successfully complete remediation (if necessary) in order to receive a passing grade in the NRS-493 course.

1. Remediation must be completed prior to the end-date of Topic 7. Competency areas in need of remediation:

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________

2. My remediation plan (to be reviewed with faculty):

 

Frequency __________________

Needs Assessment

Go to the CDC using the link below and read the Community Health Assessment and Health Improvements Plan page. Click on the link Principles to Consider for the Implementation of a Community Health Needs Assessment Process and read the pdf document.

/orders/www.cdc.gov/publichealthgateway/cha/plan.html

After reading the Principles to Consider for the Implementation of a Community Health Needs Assessment Process document. Choose one of the seven Principles to Inform Implementation of the Affordable Care Act’s Assessment Provisions discussing how your intervention speaks to that specific principle.

Community as Client

Go to the National Association of County and City Health Officials website and put community health assessment in the search bar. Read the Community Health Assessment and Planning page.

Submit a 500 word summary on how your project will build community relationships for health promotion based on the information you read.

Nursing Intervention

Click on the link below and review the article Use of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association taxonomies, Nursing Intervention Classification, Nursing Outcomes Classification and NANDA-NIC-NOC Linkage in Cardiac Rehabilitation.

 

 

Review the tables in the article and create a nursing diagnosis with 5 nursing interventions for your change proposal topic. Submit the nursing diagnosis and nursing interventions after reviewing them with your preceptor.

Measurable Outcomes

Click on the permalink below and read the article Exploring School Nurse Interventions and Health and Education Outcomes: An Integrative Review

/orders/lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=/orders/search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1166558&site=eds-live&scope=site

Submit a 500 word summary of the article and how you will measure the intended outcomes for the change proposal.

Safety and Ethics

Read the six standards of practice on the American Nurses Association website and identify one standard for a self-improvement plan

Submit a 500 word summary of the standard that you selected and your improvement plan.

Accountability and Dependability

Identify the impact of nurses calling off to patient care.

Submit a minimum of (2) research articles on the impact of call offs to patient care and a 500 word summary on how nurses calling off can negatively impact patient care.

Research /Quality

Select two items from the American Nurses Association Research Tool Kit and identify how these tools help nurses read and apply evidence to nursing practice.

Submit a 500 word summary discussing two of the tools from the American Nurses Association Research Tool Kit and how they will help you apply evidence to your evidence based intervention.

Communication and Collaboration

Read the article by following the permalink below:

/orders/lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=/orders/search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=118680229&site=eds-live&scope=site

After reading the article summarize who you will engage in interprofessional collaboration in relation to your intervention and desired outcomes.

Leadership Reflection

Select (3) of the (10) servant leadership principles and apply them to the clinical setting.

Submit a 500 word summary on the three principles you selected and how you will display them in the clinical setting. Use two peer reviewed references to support your thoughts.

Student Signature: __________________________________ Date: _________

Preceptor Signature: _________________________________ Date: _________

Faculty Signature:___________________________________ Date: _________

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NRS-493 NRS-493-O501 Literature Evaluation Table 50.0
Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) 3: Satisfactory (79.00%) 4: Good (89.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 100.0%
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article 5.0% Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is not included. Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present. Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is clearly provided and well developed. Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Article Title and Year Published 5.0% Article title and year published section is not included. Article title and year published section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Article title and year published section is present. Article title and year published section is clearly provided and well developed. Article title and year published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study 10.0% Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is not included. Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present. Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is clearly provided and well developed. Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) 5.0% Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is not included. Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present. Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is clearly provided and well developed. Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Setting or Sample 5.0% Setting or sample section is not included. Setting or sample section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Setting or sample section is present. Setting or sample section is clearly provided and well developed. Setting or sample section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Methods: Intervention or Instruments 5.0% Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is not included. Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is present. Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is clearly provided and well developed. Methods: Intervention or Instruments section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Analysis 10.0% Analysis section is not included. Analysis section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Analysis section is present. Analysis section is clearly provided and well developed. Analysis section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Key Findings 10.0% Key findings section is not included. Key findings section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Key findings section is present. Key findings section is clearly provided and well developed. Key findings section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Recommendations 10.0% Recommendations section is not included. Recommendations section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Recommendations section is present. Recommendations section is clearly provided and well developed. Recommendations section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone 10.0% Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is not included. Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is provided. Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is clearly provided and well developed. Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Presentation 10.0% The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 10.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Who We Are 

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NRS-493-RS5 Practice Experience Conference Form

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

  • Guarantee
    NRS-493-RS5 Practice Experience Conference Form
    NRS-493-RS5 Practice Experience Conference Form

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, affordable, plagiarism-free paper

Comments are closed.