Evidence Based Practice
Evidence Based Practice
Two articles chosen are:
A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness to reduce stress and burnout among intern medical practitioners (Quantitative)
Is self-esteem actually the protective factor of nursing burnout? (Qualitative)
Attached are directions, grading rubric as well as an example of a submission by another student.
EBP and Applied Nursing Research Insert your name here Western Governors University C361 TASK 1
EBP and Applied Nursing Research
A. Evaluate a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article
The primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article that I chose to evaluate is:
(put the reference for your article here)
A1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the article:
a1a. Background or introduction.
1 paragraph here, citing your article
a1b. Review of the literature
1 paragraph here, citing your article
a1c. Data Analysis
1 paragraph here, citing your article
a1d. Methodology
1 paragraph here, citing your article
A2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.
a2a. Background or introduction supports the outcome of the study
1 paragraph here, citing your article
a2b. Review of the literature supports the outcome of the study
1 paragraph here, citing your article
a2c. Data Analysis supports the outcome of the study
This was 2 sentences, citing your article
a2d. Methodology supports the outcome of the study
This was 3 sentences, citing your article
A3. Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the chosen journal article.
This was 3 sentences, citing your article
A4. Describe one strength and one limitation of the study.
This was 2 paragraphs (one for strength and one limitation), citing your article on each
A5. Describe how the evidence from the article informs current nursing practices.
1 paragraph here, citing your article
B. Evaluate a primary, qualitative research, peer-reviewed journal article
The primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article that I chose to evaluate is:
(put the reference for your article here)
B1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the article:
b1a. Background or introduction.
1 paragraph here, citing your article
b1b. Review of the literature
1 paragraph here, citing your article
b1c. Data Analysis
1 paragraph here, citing your article
b1d. Methodology
1 paragraph here, citing your article
B2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.
b2a. Background or introduction supports the outcome of the study
1 paragraph here, citing your article
b2b. Review of the literature supports the outcome of the study
1 paragraph here, citing your article
b2c. Data Analysis supports the outcome of the study
1 paragraph here, citing your article
b2d. Methodology supports the outcome of the study
1 paragraph here, citing your article
B3. Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the chosen journal article.
1 paragraph here, citing your article
B4. Describe one strength and one limitation of the study.
This was 2 paragraphs (one for strength and one limitation), citing your article on each
B5. Describe how the evidence from the article informs current nursing practices.
1 paragraph here, citing your article
Running Head: EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE
Evidence Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research
Task 1 -XAP1
Adrianna Thorstad
Western Governors University
A: Quantitative Article: Song, I.-K., Park, Y.-H., Lee, J.-H., Kim, J.-T., Choi, I. H., & Kim, H.-S. (2016). Randomized controlled trial on preemptive analgesia for acute postoperative pain management in children. Pediatric Anesthesia, 438–443. doi: 10.1111/pan.12864
Background or Introduction
This study was aimed to assess the use of intravenous preemptive analgesia in the treatment of acute pain from surgical corrective osteotomies, preformed in children over two years.
Review of the Literature
The researchers of this study cited a total of 25 different articles that were used to support the study conducted. Some of these topics include the recommended use of morphine in children, the effects of early pain experience in adolescents, emergence delirium and preemptive analgesia.
Data Analysis
The data gathered during the research was analyzed using four different types of tests. These included the T-test, Fishers Exact test, Mann-Whitney U, and x^2 test.
Discussion of Methodology
The method the researcher’s used was a quantitative randomized controlled trial. 51 patients were chosen because of their similar ages and intended surgical procedures. The group was split and randomly assigned to a control group and a test group. The test group received preemptive analgesia five minutes before the first surgical incision was made, the control group was given routine analgesia five minutes after the surgery began.
Quantitative: Conclusions
The introduction of the study was very well thought out and offered factors that contributed to inadequate pain relief and the potential negative future adverse events that adolescents could undergo if their postoperative pain is not managed appropriately. The literature used by the researchers to support their study was intentional and included several uses of preemptive analgesia in different types of surgeries. The literature also accounted for the ages of the children and their ethnicity, which was Asian in this case. The data analysis used was statistical and objective which led to exact results with no gray areas. The methodology used was appropriate for maintaining the integrity of the study, including the use of an independent outcome assessor who was also blind to the randomization results. An implication for further research could be done as the test and control group only had a ten-minute difference in the delivery of the analgesic for pain management.
Quantitative: Protection and Considerations
The researchers protected the participants of the study by obtaining approval from the Seoul National University Hospital Institutional Review Board before research began. The researchers also obtains written informed consents from the parents and legal guardians for each child involved. Children with histories of drug allergies, who had experienced side effects from opioids, or had developmental delays were excluded for their safety.
Quantitative: Strengths and Limitations
A strength of the study was the researchers drive to keep the study as randomized as they could, first by using an online software to randomize the groups and secondly by having a blind independent outcome assessor. A limitation of the study was the small sample size of the resulted data. The study began with 51 patients but the data was only collected on 41 due to surgery changes and loss of data on the patient controlled analgesia pumps.
Quantitative: Evidence Applications
The conclusion of this study informs nursing practice by potentially changing the way nurses manage postoperative pain. The researchers state in the study that there was only a ten-minute time gap in between control and test group. This may have not been sufficient allotted time for the pain medication to work and truly make a difference in the children’s pain. If this is investigated further and preemptive analgesics are given even earlier in pre-surgical stages, it could lead to results that state preemptive analgesia is helpful and does make a difference in postoperative pain. Nurses may find themselves never having the encounter things such as breakthrough pain or even moderate/severe pain that many experience post-surgery. On the other hand, if no difference is found using preemptive analgesia, maybe there will be more research into multimodal approaches to pain management. This would also affect nursing practice because nurses in post-surgical situations would find themselves needing to be up to date and informed of best practices for pain management.
B: Qualitative Article: Harvey, K. A., & Kovalesky, A. (2018). Post-Operative Pain and Comfort in Children After Heart Surgery: A Comparison of Nurses and Families Pre-operative Expectations. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 43, 9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.07.014
Background or Introduction
The purpose of the study was to gain insight into the expectations of the parents and nurses about pain control and comfort in children after heart surgery in hopes of contributing to evidence-based family-centered interventions.
Review of the Literature
The researchers cited 42 articles to support their study throughout the article. A couple of the topics that the researchers discussed to support their study included: parent stress levels during children’s hospital recovery, holistic comfort, coping, parent education, and post-operative pain management.
Data Analysis
The data was collected during semi-structured interviews to obtain qualitative data. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. The interviews were then analyzed for themes in the narratives that represented perceptions and expectations around comfort for the hospitalized child.
Discussion of Methodology
The method the researchers used was qualitative. 20 nurses and 23 parents or legal guardians were interviewed about their perceptions of pain management in the hospitalized child post heart surgery.
Qualitative: Conclusions
The articles introduction does a great job in painting the picture of why this study was carried out. It explains how many children each year are born with heart defects requiring surgery, how peri-operative times for families and parents of children with CHD can be very stressful and reinforces a family centered care approach to maximize comfort in the hospitalized child. The review of the literature is extensive and very intentional with articles specific to the necessity of parental involvement in pain management for adolescents. The data analysis was thorough and appropriate, using recorded interviews with open ended questions and content analysis to find themes. The methodology used was applicable to a qualitative research article, using interested parents and nurses who were interviewed over a six-month period. This research article offers an insight into the perceptions and expectations of parents and nurses taking care of post-surgical children in pain. With these themes, research can be done to find and implement better practices in the preparation of nurses and families regarding post-surgical pain in children. Qualitative: Protection and Considerations
The researchers protected the study participants by obtaining ethics committee approval at the study site, a tertiary pediatric center in the Pacific Northwest. The participants both nurses and family members signed written informed consents before their interviews were given.
Qualitative: Strengths and Limitations
A strength of the study was the interviews that were given to the participants. The principle investigator conducting the interviews asked open-ended questions that resulting in narratives from which themes were gathered. A limitation of the study was that almost all of the participating family members were mothers of the children undergoing surgery. This means that perceptions of pain management for the child from the father or other family members was not recorded and addressed.
Qualitative: Evidence Application
The conclusion of this study informs nursing practice that the nurse-parent relationship and collaboration surrounding adolescent post-surgical pain management needs to be improved. Although education pre-operatively regarding pain management is handled by other staff excluding nurses, re-education for families in these situations by nurses may need to be necessary. This conversation may help to build a stronger rapport for the family and nurse assigned to their child. This may also include the implementation of goals for pain levels and care plans for the post-surgical adolescent decided on by the nurse and families. Lack of staff, level of acuity or other things negatively impacting the nurse-parent relationships will need to be addressed so that parent’s feel their child is being prioritized and handled with the highest quality of care. Education, goal setting and more time spent with families to discuss their child’s pain management will aid in the stronger satisfaction, better outcomes, and less stress on the families in these situations.
References
Harvey, K. A., & Kovalesky, A. (2018). Post-Operative Pain and Comfort in Children After Heart Surgery: A Comparison of Nurses and Families Pre-operative Expectations. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 43, 9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.07.014
Song, I.-K., Park, Y.-H., Lee, J.-H., Kim, J.-T., Choi, I. H., & Kim, H.-S. (2016). Randomized controlled trial on preemptive analgesia for acute postoperative pain management in children. Pediatric Anesthesia, 438–443. doi: 10.1111/pan.12864
ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS
Who We Are
We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework.
Do you handle any type of coursework?
Yes. We have posted over our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications and future communication.
Is it hard to Place an Order?
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT
1. Click on the “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
100% Reliable Site. Make this your Home of Academic Papers.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Who We Are
We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.Do you handle any type of coursework?
Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.Is it hard to Place an Order?
- 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
- 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS –
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.
- Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
- Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
- APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
- Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
- LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
- Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
- Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
- Guarantee
- Zero Plagiarism
- On-time delivery
- A-Grade Papers
- Free Revision
- 24/7 Support
- 100% Confidentiality
- Professional Writers
- Services Offered
- Custom paper writing
- Question and answers
- Essay paper writing
- Editing and proofreading
- Plagiarism removal services
- Multiple answer questions
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper