EBP Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

EBP Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

EBP Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

EBP Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

In 500-750 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:

  1. Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data.
  2. Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved.
  3. Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability.
  4. Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results.
  5. Describe implications for practice and future research.

You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. EBP Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. EBP Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

Note: After submitting the assignment, you will receive feedback from the instructor. Use this feedback to make revisions for your final paper submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

Rubric_Print_Format4.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NUR-590 NUR-590-O500 Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section E: Implementation Plan 100.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) Satisfactory (88.00%) Good (92.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 70.0%
Setting and Access to Potential Subjects 5.0% A description of setting and access to potential subjects is not included. A description of setting and access to potential subjects is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of setting and access to potential subjects is present. A description of setting and access to potential subjects is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of setting and access to potential subjects is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Amount of Time Needed to Complete This Project 5.0% A description of the amount of time needed to complete this project is not included. A description of the amount of time needed to complete this project is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of the amount of time needed to complete this project is present. A description of the amount of time needed to complete this project is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of the amount of time needed to complete this project is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Resources or Changes Needed in the Implementation of the Solution 10.0% A description of the resources or changes needed in the implementation of the solution is not included. A description of the resources or changes needed in the implementation of the solution is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of the resources or changes needed in the implementation of the solution is present. A description of the resources or changes needed in the implementation of the solution is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of the resources or changes needed in the implementation of the solution is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Methods And Instruments 10.0% A description of methods and instruments is not included. A description of methods and instruments is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of methods and instruments is present. A description of methods and instruments is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of methods and instruments is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Process for Delivering the Intervention Solution 10.0% A description of the process for delivering the intervention solution is not included. A description of the process for delivering the intervention solution is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of the process for delivering the intervention solution is present. A description of the process for delivering the intervention solution is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of the process for delivering the intervention solution is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Data Collection, Including Data Management and Analysis Processes 5.0% A description of data collection, including data management and analysis processes, is not included. A description of data collection, including data management and analysis processes, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of data collection, including data management and analysis processes, is present. A description of data collection, including data management and analysis processes, is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of data collection, including data management and analysis processes, is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Strategies to Deal With the Management of Any Barriers, Facilitators, and Challenges 5.0% A description of strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges is not included. A description of strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges is present. A description of strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Feasibility of the Implementation Plan 5.0% A description of the feasibility of the implementation plan is not included. A description of the feasibility of the implementation plan is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of the feasibility of the implementation plan is present. A description of the feasibility of the implementation plan is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description the feasibility of the implementation plan is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue a Proposed Solution After Implementation 10.0% A description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is not included. A description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is present. A description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is clearly provided and well developed. A comprehensive description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Required Sources 5.0% Sources are not included. Number of required sources is only partially met. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – EBP Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. EBP Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. EBP Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

  • GuaranteeEBP Proposal - Section F: Evaluation of Process

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. EBP Proposal – Section F: Evaluation of Process

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Comments are closed.