Posts in category: Nursing Papers

Practicum Experience for Professional Growth Assignment

Professional Growth Assignment

Your practicum experiences in NURS 8410, NURS 8400, and NURS 8500 have provided opportunities to gain knowledge, perspective, and skills that bolster your specialty area practice. They have laid a foundation for reflecting on your own strengths and challenges as a scholar-practitioner and a nurse leader in a dynamic workplace. Indeed, significant self-analysis is a core aspect of this course, and you will be asked to integrate this type of reflection into your work on several assignments in the upcoming weeks.

This Discussion serves as a springboard for the Practicum assignment you are to develop this week. As you plan your practicum experience for this course, consider how you can effectively communicate with key stakeholders in your practicum setting regarding the implementation, evaluation, and dissemination of an evidence-based project.

To prepare for Practicum Experience for Professional Growth Assignment:

• View and consider the “To prepare” section of the Week 1 Assignment area.
• Reflect on your practicum experiences in NURS 8410, NURS 8400, and NURS 8500.
• Assess the professional growth (including development of leadership and communication skills) you have achieved through previous practicum experiences in the DNP program. Also, think about the topics presented in courses you completed earlier in the program. Are there content areas or    skills that you would like to—or may need to—address to facilitate your continued development as a scholar-practitioner and a nurse leader?
• Think about competencies that support the successful implementation, evaluation, and dissemination of an evidence-based project, and assess your strengths and areas for growth with regard to these competencies.
• Begin to develop your plan for the practicum, including two or three learning objectives.

By tomorrow Tuesday May 28, 2019 write a minimum of 550 words essay in APA format with at least three scholarly references. Include the level one header as numbered below:

Post a cohesive response that addresses the following:

1) Describe how you intend to use your practicum experience to further your goals for successful evidence-based project implementation, evaluation, and dissemination and for your development as a scholar-practitioner and a nurse leader.

Required Readings for Practicum Experience for Professional Growth Assignment

Oermann, M. H., & Hays, J. C. (2016). Writing for publication in nursing (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

· Chapter 1, “Getting Started”

This chapter introduces the steps an author can follow in planning, writing, and publishing manuscripts in nursing. The chapter predominantly focuses on early writing decisions.

· Chapter 2, “Selecting a Journal”

Chapter 2 focuses on how to evaluate and select journals. The chapter also provides guidelines for writing a query letter to gauge the interest of journal editors.

· Chapter 4, “Reviewing the Literature”

In this chapter, the authors make suggestions for conducting and writing a literature review for a manuscript.

Keep in mind that, as noted in Chapter 4, the Literature Review section of an article for publication must be tailored for that format; it is not the same as for an academic paper.

Required Media

Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2012b). The DNP Project. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 6 minutes.

Dr. Kristen Mauk shares her experiences and insights on developing and completing her DNP Project.

Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Project – NURS 8410 Assignment

Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Project – NURS 8410 Assignment

NURS 8410: Disseminating the EBP Assignment Paper

NURS 8410: Disseminating the EBP Assignment Paper

Many factors influence how successfully an EBP Assignment is implemented and evaluated. As noted in this week’s Learning Resources, using a translation framework can facilitate effective implementation and the evaluation of outcomes. NURS 8410: Disseminating the EBP Essay Assignment. For this assignment you will prepare a scholarly product that reports the results and implications of your project to designed audience.  The scholarly product for dissemination reports the results and implications of your project to a specified audience. Your scholarly product may be in the form of a project summary and evaluation report, poster presentation, program evaluation report, or a media or technology-based deliverable.

To prepare for this week’s section of Application 5: NURS 8410: Disseminating the EBP Assignment Paper

• Reflect on the definitions and criteria for scholarship presented in the Learning Resources and in your weekly discussions.
• Consider AACN’s definition of scholarship and their vision of the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in furthering nursing scholarship.

The full Application 5 is due by Day 7 of this week. Instructions for how to prepare for previous sections of this Application have been provided in Weeks 9 and 10.

To complete this NURS 8410: Disseminating the EBP Assignment Paper:

Assignment 5: Disseminating the EBP Assignment

For this assignment you will prepare a scholarly product that reports the results and implications of your project to designed audience.  The scholarly product for dissemination reports the results and implications of your project to a specified audience. Your scholarly product may be in the form of a project summary and evaluation report,  poster presentation, program evaluation report, or a media or technology-based deliverable, Your scholarly product must include the following:

• Background, Purpose, and Nature of the Project (2 points)  Describe the larger problem or issue you explored in your DNP Project. Identify your practice-focused question. Explain how this problem or issue affects nursing practice and the overall health care system, and describe how your DNP Project explored possible strategies for addressing the problem or issue.
• Evidence (2 points)

Identify the practice setting and context in which you conducted your project, a summary of the evidence supporting the project, and the process for implementation and evaluation.  

• Presentation of Results (2 points)

Explain the results of your DNP Project and recommendations for change that you made to the organization.

Submission and Grading Information – NURS 8410: Disseminating the EBP Assignment Paper

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

• Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name. NURS 8410: Disseminating the EBP Assignment Paper.
• Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
• Click the Week 11 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
• Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
• If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
• Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric: Week 11 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity: Submit your Week 11 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment: Week 11 Assignment

Practicum: Journal and Time Log

By Day 7

You will submit a journal entry (along with your time log) for Weeks 8-11. Journal entries need to connect your previous professional experience with your practice, competencies/concepts in the program, and the literature. Your journal entry should be week-based and sequential so that all journal entries are contained in one file.

• Describe the observed activity
• Using an evidence-based approach, analyze the problem, issue, or situation. Address questions posed in the weekly practicum pages if appropriate.
• Reveal how the real-world might mirror or diverge from program-related evidence, concepts, and/or theories.
• Time Log submission

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Practicum for review and grading, do the following:

• Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Practicum+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
• Click the Week 11 Practicum link.
• Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Practicum+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
• If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database. NURS 8410: Disseminating the EBP Assignment Paper.
• Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

To access your rubric:

Week 11 Practicum Rubric

Check Your Practicum Draft for Authenticity

To check your Practicum draft for authenticity: Submit your Week 11 Practicum draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Practicum by Day 7

To submit your Practicum: Week 11 Practicum

Week in Review

In this final week you analyzed the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in scholarship and assessed the practicum experience.

Congratulations! After you have finished all of the assignments for this week, you have completed the course. Please submit your Course Evaluation by Day 7.

NURS 8410 Week 11: Dissemination, Part I

One of the chief purposes of translating evidence into practice is to advance the field of nursing. Dissemination is a critical step in this process.

It is important to disseminate and share the information gained from a translation-of-evidence project to enhance the body of knowledge within the profession, thus furthering the science of nursing. Yet how does one prepare to disseminate research findings? What is required to engage in this form of scholarship? NURS 8410: Disseminating the EBP Assignment Paper.

This week, you assess the role of dissemination in scholarship. You also complete your practicum experience and submit your time log and final journal entry.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

• Analyze the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in scholarship
• Assess the practicum experience

Photo Credit: [Blend_ImagesCLOSE]/[Blend Images]/Getty Images

NURS 8410: Disseminating the EBP Essay Assignment

Learning Resources

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Required Readings

White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S. & Terhan, M.F. (2016). Translation of evidence into nursing and health care practice (2nd ed.) New York, NY: Springer.

• Chapter 18, Dissemination of Evidence

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (1999). Defining scholarship for the discipline of nursing. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/position/defining-scholarship 

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2006). The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/position/DNPEssentials.pdf

Boyer, E. L. (1992). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Issues in Accounting Education, 7(1), 87-91. NURS 8410: Disseminating the EBP Assignment Paper.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Carina, K., Chan, Y., Oldenburg, B., & Kasisomayajula, V. (2015). Advancing the science of dissemination and implementation in behavioral medicine: Evidence and progress. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 277-282 doi 10.1007/s12529-015-9490-2

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Glassick, C. E. (2000). Boyer’s expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Academic Medicine, 75(9), 877-880. Retrieved from http://www.academicpeds.org/events/assets/Glassick article.pdf

Lane, J.P. & Stone, V.J. (2015). Comparing three knowledge communication strategies – diffusion, dissemination and translation – through randomized controlled studies. Assistive Technologydoi:10.3233/978-1-61499-566-1-92

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. NURS 8410: Disseminating the EBP Essay Assignment

Leeman, J., Myers, A.E.,Ribisl, K.M.,& Ammerman, A.S. (2015). Disseminating policy and environmental change interventions: Insights from obesity prevention and tobacco control. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22:301–311 doi 10.1007/s12529-014-9427-1

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Rieger, K. & Schultz, A.S. (2014). Exploring arts-based knowledge translation: Sharing research findings through performing the patterns, rehearsing the results, staging the synthesis. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11(2), 133–139.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Tricco, a.C., Ashoor, H.M., Cardoso, R., MacDonald, H., Cogo, E., Kastner, M., Perrier, L., McKibbon, A., Grimshaw, J.M. & Straus, S.E. (2016). Sustainability of knowledge translation interventions in healthcare decision making: a scoping review. Implementation Science, 11(55) doi 10.1186/s13012-016-0421-7

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

NURS 8410 Planning Implementing and Evaluating EBP

Planning for Change, Implementing and Evaluating EBP Essay Assignments – NURS 8410

Assignment 1: Application 4: Planning for Change, Implementing and Evaluating EBP Assignments

Evaluating EBP Assignments

Many factors influence how successfully an EBP Project is implemented and evaluated. As noted in this week’s Learning Resources, using a translation framework can facilitate effective implementation and the evaluation of outcomes.

As you complete Application 4, revisit the evidence-based practice model or framework you selected for your EBP Assignment (Application 2). How does the model or framework facilitate the evaluation of outcomes? Would another model or framework better meet the needs of your project?

To prepare for this week’s section of Application 4:

• Continue (from this week’s Discussion) to:
  • Identify an appropriate method for evaluating your outcomes.
  • Develop new practice guidelines based on the possible results of the evaluation.
  • Create, if appropriate, new standards of care that would be based on the new practice guidelines.

The full Application 4 is due by Day 7 of this week. Instructions for how to prepare for previous sections of this Application have been provided in Weeks 8 and 9. Assignment 1: Application 4: Planning for Change, Implementing and Evaluating EBP Assignments

To complete:

Write a 4- to 8-page paper that addresses the following:

Planning for Change

• Analyze the impact of implementing change in your practice environment, including the factors that need to be considered regarding stakeholders and end users.
• Summarize the methods you would use to ensure that those are adequately addressed. Assignment 1: Application 4: Planning for Change, Implementing and Evaluating EBP Assignments

Implementing EBP Assignments

• Identify the desired outcomes of your EBP Assignment.
• Describe any macro or micro systems issues that may inhibit implementation and strategies for resolving those issues.
• Explain how resolving your EBP Assignment issue will improve quality and patient safety. Planning for Change Implementing and Evaluating EBP Essay Assignments – NURS 8410

Evaluating EBP Assignments

• Describe evaluation strategies.
• Formulate new practice guidelines based on the possible results of the evaluation of outcomes.
• Describe, if appropriate, new standards of care relevant to the new practice guidelines.

By Day 7 of Assignment 1: Application 4: Planning for Change, Implementing and Evaluating EBP Assignments

Application 4 is due.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

• Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
• Click the Week 10 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
• Click the Week 10 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
• Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
• If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
• Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria for Assignment 1: Application 4: Planning for Change, Implementing and Evaluating EBP Assignments

To access your rubric: Week 10 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity: Submit your Week 10 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment: Week 10 Assignment

Planning for Change Implementing and Evaluating EBP Essay Assignments – NURS 8410

NURS 8410 Week 10 Assignment 2: Application 5: Disseminating the EBP Assignment

One of the chief purposes of translating evidence into practice is to advance the field of nursing. Dissemination is a critical step in this process. It is important to disseminate and share the information gained from a translation-of-evidence project to enhance the body of knowledge within the profession, thus furthering the science of nursing. To prepare for this week’s section of Application 5: Planning for Change, Implementing and Evaluating EBP Essay Assignments – NURS 8410.

• Continue (from this week’s Discussion) to:
  • Analyze the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in scholarship

The full Application 5 is due by Day 6 of week 11.

For this assignment you will prepare a scholarly product that reports the results and implications of your project to designed audience.  The scholarly product for dissemination reports the results and implications of your project to a specified audience. Your scholarly product may be in the form of a project summary and evaluation report,  poster presentation, program evaluation report, or a media or technology-based deliverable, Your scholarly product must include the following:

• Background, Purpose, and Nature of the Project (2 points) Describe the larger problem or issue you explored in your DNP Project. Identify your practice-focused question. Explain how this problem or issue affects nursing practice and the overall health care system, and describe how your DNP Project explored possible strategies for addressing the problem or issue.
• Evidence (2 points)

Identify the practice setting and context in which you conducted your project, a summary of the evidence supporting the project, and the process for implementation and evaluation.  Planning for Change Implementing and Evaluating EBP Essay Assignments – NURS 8410

• Presentation of Results (2 points)

Explain the results of your DNP Project and recommendations for change that you made to the organization.

Note: Up to 2 points may be deducted for grammar, spelling, and/or APA errors.

This Application is due by Day 6 of Week 11.

Planning for Change Implementing and Evaluating EBP – NURS 8410

Practicum

Continue to keep a time log and journal of your practicum experiences. See the Practicum Guidelines located in the Practicum area of the Course Overview page for a complete description of the practicum.

By Day 7 of Week 11

Reminder: You will submit your time log and a journal entry in Week 11.

Planning for Change Implementing and Evaluating EBP Essay Assignments – NURS 8410

Week in Review

This week, you evaluated new practice approach outcomes in a specialty area and developed guidelines for practice based on the evaluation of outcomes. You also recommended new standards of care to address a health issue in a specialty area.

In this final week, you will assess the role of dissemination in scholarship. You will complete your practicum experience and submit your time log and final journal entry.

NURS 8410 Week 10: Evaluation of Outcomes

“One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results.” —Milton Friedman

How do you measure the success of a translation project to determine if new practice approaches actually make a difference? Evaluating the results or outcomes of the translation of evidence into practice is the key. Only by evaluating the outcomes can you ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of your new practice approaches.

During Week 9, you outlined desired outcomes for the issue you have been addressing through your EBP Assignment. In the Discussion, you suggested changes at the micro and/or macro systems level to improve quality outcomes.

This week, you determine how the success of the new practice approaches can be evaluated. Then, you explore the next steps of translating research evidence into new guidelines for practice, and ultimately, standards of care. You also continue your practicum experience.

Reference: Friedman, M. (Guest). (1975). Living within our means [Television series episode]. In The Open Mind. New York, NY.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

• Evaluate the outcomes of new practice approaches in a specialty area
• Develop guidelines for practice based on the evaluation of outcomes of new practice approaches in a specialty area
• Recommend new standards of care to address a health issue in a specialty area

Photo Credit: [stevanovicigor]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

Learning Resources

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Required Readings

White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terharr, M. F. (2016). Translation of evidence into nursing and health care practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

• Chapter 17, “Data Management and Evaluation of Translation”

Erickson, K., Monsen, K.A., Artleson, I.S., Radosevich, D.M., Oftedahl, G., Neely, C., & Thorsen, D.R. Translation of obesity practice guidelines: Measurement and evaluation. Public Health Nursing, 12(3), 222–231

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Wang, Y., Xiao, L.D., Ullah, S., Guo-Ping, H., & De Bellis, A. Evaluation of a nurse-led dementia education and knowledge translation programme in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial (2017). Nurse Education Today, 49, 1-7.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Abdullah, G., Rossy, D., Ploeg, J., Davies, B., Higuchi, K., Sikora, L., & Stacey, D. (2014). Measuring the effectiveness of mentoring asa knowledge translation intervention for implementing empirical evidence: A systematic review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11 (5) 284–300.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Einarson, A., Egberts, T.c., & Heerdink, E.R. (2015). Antidepressant use in pregnancy: knowledge transfer and translation of research findings. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21, 579-583 doi:10.1111/jep.12338

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Discussion: Evaluation of Outcomes

As you translate evidence into practice, it is essential to consider how you will evaluate the outcomes. As introduced in Week 8, you are likely to encounter barriers as you integrate research findings into practice. Using a framework for evaluation can assist in minimizing those barriers.

As a nurse engaged in advanced practice, it is now time to take your practicum project to the next level—evaluating the outcomes you identified for the Week 9 Discussion and then developing new practice guidelines. Planning for Change, Implementing and Evaluating EBP Essay Assignments – NURS 8410.

To prepare for Discussion: Evaluation of Outcomes:

• The course text, Translation of Evidence Into Nursing and Health Care Practice, provides a list of questions that should be considered when planning for evaluation. See page 239 for this list of questions.
• Review the Learning Resources focusing on the various evaluation frameworks presented. Select a framework and determine how you would evaluate the outcomes you identified in the Week 9 Discussion.
• Based on the possible results of your evaluation, envision new practice guidelines you would develop.
• What new standards of care might this lead to?

By Day 3 of Discussion: Evaluation of Outcomes

Post a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:

• In the first line of your posting, state the outcomes you are addressing (those you initially identified in the Week 9 Discussion).
• How would you evaluate the outcomes? Support your response with evidence from the literature.
• What new practice guidelines would you create based on your evaluation of those outcomes?
• Discuss any new standards of care that would be appropriate based on the new practice guidelines.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6 of Discussion: Evaluation of Outcomes

Respond to two of your colleagues in one or more of the following ways:

• Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research.
• Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
• Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom and/or from your own research in the Walden Library.
• Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
• Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
• Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you learned and/or any insights you gained as a result of the comments made by your colleagues.

Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and any additional sources.

Total Points: 30

Total Points: 30

 

Total Points: 30

Total Points: 30

Total Points: 30

NURS 8410 Week 10 Assignment 2: Application 5: Disseminating the EBP

NURS 8410 Week 10 Assignment 2: Application 5: Disseminating the EBP

One of the chief purposes of translating evidence into practice is to advance the field of nursing. Dissemination is a critical step in this process. It is important to disseminate and share the information gained from a translation-of-evidence project to enhance the body of knowledge within the profession, thus furthering the science of nursing. To prepare for this week’s section of NURS 8410 Week 10 Assignment 2: Application 5: Disseminating the EBP.

• Continue (from this week’s Discussion) to:
  • Analyze the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in scholarship

The full Application 5 is due by Day 6 of week 11.

For this assignment you will prepare a scholarly product that reports the results and implications of your project to designed audience.  The scholarly product for dissemination reports the results and implications of your project to a specified audience. Your scholarly product may be in the form of a project summary and evaluation report,  poster presentation, program evaluation report, or a media or technology-based deliverable, Your scholarly product must include the following:

• Background, Purpose, and Nature of the Project (2 points) Describe the larger problem or issue you explored in your DNP Project. Identify your practice-focused question. Explain how this problem or issue affects nursing practice and the overall health care system, and describe how your DNP Project explored possible strategies for addressing the problem or issue.
• Evidence (2 points)

Identify the practice setting and context in which you conducted your project, a summary of the evidence supporting the project, and the process for implementation and evaluation.  

• Presentation of Results (2 points)

Explain the results of your DNP Project and recommendations for change that you made to the organization.

Note: Up to 2 points may be deducted for grammar, spelling, and/or APA errors.

This Application is due by Day 6 of Week 11.

Practicum – NURS 8410 Week 10 Assignment 2: Application 5: Disseminating the EBP

Continue to keep a time log and journal of your practicum experiences. See the Practicum Guidelines located in the Practicum area of the Course Overview page for a complete description of the practicum.

By Day 7 of Week 11

Reminder: You will submit your time log and a journal entry in Week 11.

Week in Review

This week, you evaluated new practice approach outcomes in a specialty area and developed guidelines for practice based on the evaluation of outcomes. You also recommended new standards of care to address a health issue in a specialty area.

In this final week, you will assess the role of dissemination in scholarship. You will complete your practicum experience and submit your time log and final journal entry.

NURS 8410 Week 10 Assignment 2: Application 5: Disseminating the EBP

NURS 8410 Week 10: Evaluation of Outcomes

“One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results.” —Milton Friedman

How do you measure the success of a translation project to determine if new practice approaches actually make a difference? Evaluating the results or outcomes of the translation of evidence into practice is the key. Only by evaluating the outcomes can you ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of your new practice approaches.

During Week 9, you outlined desired outcomes for the issue you have been addressing through your EBP Assignment. In the Discussion, you suggested changes at the micro and/or macro systems level to improve quality outcomes.

This week, you determine how the success of the new practice approaches can be evaluated. Then, you explore the next steps of translating research evidence into new guidelines for practice, and ultimately, standards of care. You also continue your practicum experience.

Reference: Friedman, M. (Guest). (1975). Living within our means [Television series episode]. In The Open Mind. New York, NY.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

• Evaluate the outcomes of new practice approaches in a specialty area
• Develop guidelines for practice based on the evaluation of outcomes of new practice approaches in a specialty area
• Recommend new standards of care to address a health issue in a specialty area

Photo Credit: [stevanovicigor]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

Learning Resources

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Required Readings

White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terharr, M. F. (2016). Translation of evidence into nursing and health care practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

• Chapter 17, “Data Management and Evaluation of Translation”

Erickson, K., Monsen, K.A., Artleson, I.S., Radosevich, D.M., Oftedahl, G., Neely, C., & Thorsen, D.R. Translation of obesity practice guidelines: Measurement and evaluation. Public Health Nursing, 12(3), 222–231

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. NURS 8410 Week 10 Assignment 2: Application 5: Disseminating the EBP.

Wang, Y., Xiao, L.D., Ullah, S., Guo-Ping, H., & De Bellis, A. Evaluation of a nurse-led dementia education and knowledge translation programme in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial (2017). Nurse Education Today, 49, 1-7.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Abdullah, G., Rossy, D., Ploeg, J., Davies, B., Higuchi, K., Sikora, L., & Stacey, D. (2014). Measuring the effectiveness of mentoring asa knowledge translation intervention for implementing empirical evidence: A systematic review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11 (5) 284–300.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Einarson, A., Egberts, T.c., & Heerdink, E.R. (2015). Antidepressant use in pregnancy: knowledge transfer and translation of research findings. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 21, 579-583 doi:10.1111/jep.12338

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Discussion: Evaluation of Outcomes

As you translate evidence into practice, it is essential to consider how you will evaluate the outcomes. As introduced in Week 8, you are likely to encounter barriers as you integrate research findings into practice. Using a framework for evaluation can assist in minimizing those barriers.

As a nurse engaged in advanced practice, it is now time to take your practicum project to the next level—evaluating the outcomes you identified for the Week 9 Discussion and then developing new practice guidelines. NURS 8410 Week 10 Assignment 2: Application 5: Disseminating the EBP.

To prepare for Discussion: Evaluation of Outcomes:

• The course text, Translation of Evidence Into Nursing and Health Care Practice, provides a list of questions that should be considered when planning for evaluation. See page 239 for this list of questions.
• Review the Learning Resources focusing on the various evaluation frameworks presented. Select a framework and determine how you would evaluate the outcomes you identified in the Week 9 Discussion.
• Based on the possible results of your evaluation, envision new practice guidelines you would develop.
• What new standards of care might this lead to?

By Day 3 of Discussion: Evaluation of Outcomes

Post a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:

• In the first line of your posting, state the outcomes you are addressing (those you initially identified in the Week 9 Discussion).
• How would you evaluate the outcomes? Support your response with evidence from the literature.
• What new practice guidelines would you create based on your evaluation of those outcomes?
• Discuss any new standards of care that would be appropriate based on the new practice guidelines.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6 of Discussion: Evaluation of Outcomes

Respond to two of your colleagues in one or more of the following ways:

• Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research.
• Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
• Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom and/or from your own research in the Walden Library.
• Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
• Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
• Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence. NURS 8410 Week 10 Assignment 2: Application 5: Disseminating the EBP.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you learned and/or any insights you gained as a result of the comments made by your colleagues.

Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and any additional sources.

NURS 8410 Week 9 Assignment 2: Application 5 – EBP Paper

NURS 8410 Week 9 Assignment 2: Application 5 – EBP Paper

One of the chief purposes of translating evidence into practice is to advance the field of nursing. Dissemination is a critical step in this process. It is important to disseminate and share the information gained from a translation-of-evidence project to enhance the body of knowledge within the profession, thus furthering the science of nursing. To prepare for this week’s section of Application 5:

• Continue (from this week’s Discussion) to:
  • Analyze the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in scholarship

The full Application 5 is due by Day 6 of week 11.

For this assignment you will prepare a scholarly product that reports the results and implications of your project to designed audience.  The scholarly product for dissemination reports the results and implications of your project to a specified audience. Your scholarly product may be in the form of a project summary and evaluation report,  poster presentation, program evaluation report, or a media or technology-based deliverable, Your scholarly product must include the following:

• Background, Purpose, and Nature of the Project (2 points) Describe the larger problem or issue you explored in your DNP Project. Identify your practice-focused question. Explain how this problem or issue affects nursing practice and the overall health care system, and describe how your DNP Project explored possible strategies for addressing the problem or issue.
• Evidence (2 points)

Identify the practice setting and context in which you conducted your project, a summary of the evidence supporting the project, and the process for implementation and evaluation.  

• Presentation of Results (2 points)

Explain the results of your DNP Project and recommendations for change that you made to the organization.

Note: Up to 2 points may be deducted for grammar, spelling, and/or APA errors.

This Application is due by Day 6 of Week 11.

Practicum – NURS 8410 Week 9 Assignment 2: Application 5 – EBP

Continue to keep a time log and journal of your practicum experiences. See the Practicum Guidelines located in the Practicum area of the Course Overview page for a complete description of the practicum.

By Day 7 of Week 11 of Assignment 1: Application 4: Planning for Change, Implementing and Evaluating EBP Assignments

Reminder: You will submit your time log and a journal entry in Week 11.

Week in Review

This week, you applied systems theory to the evaluation of quality improvement and safety initiatives.

Next week, you will determine how the success of the new practice approaches can be evaluated and explore the next steps of translating research evidence into new guidelines for practice and, ultimately, standards of care. NURS 8410 Week 9 Assignment 2: Application 5 – EBP.

NURS 8410 Week 9: Identification of Outcomes

“In a large, complex organization…the primary consequences of our actions may well be in the distant future or in a distant, but interrelated, part of a larger system in which we operate. For this reason, we are often puzzled by the underlying causes of current problems within our organizations. We are unable to look at underlying structures or patterns of behavior that may have resulted in less than stellar outcomes” (Zaccagnini & White, 2011, p. 45).

How can the perspective described above be shifted to provide a fuller view of the dynamics in today’s health care organizations? Planning for Change, Implementing and Evaluating EBP Essay Assignments – NURS 8410 And, in doing so, how could this promote the achievement of positive outcomes related to quality and safety?

In previous courses you have examined systems theory, as well as the interrelationships of various areas within an organization. This week, you revisit these concepts as you assess an issue within an organization—analyzing the system at the macro- and the micro-level. You also identify strategies that can be used to assess the clinical environment and the associated nonclinical units that support the provision of quality. In addition, you develop outcomes related to quality and safety.

This week you continue to engage in your practicum experience and on Application 4.

Reference: Zaccagnini, M. E., & White, K. W. (2011). The doctor of nursing ractice essentials: A new model for advanced practice nursing. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

• Apply systems theory to the evaluation of quality improvement and patient safety initiatives

Photo Credit: [Blend Images – Jose Luis Pelaez Inc]/[Brand X Pictures]/Getty Images

Learning Resources

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Required Readings

Brooks, P., Spillane, J.J., Dick, K., & Stuart-Shor, E. (2014). Developing a strategy to identify and treat older patients with postoperative delirium. AORN Journal, 99(2), 256-276.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Jarden, R.J. & Sutton, L.J. (2014). A practice change initiative to improve the provision of enteral nutrition to intensive care patients. British Association of Critical Care Nurses, 20(5), 242-254.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

McCluskey, A. & Middleton, S. (2010). Delivering an evidence-based outdoor journey intervention to people with stroke: Barriers and enablers experienced by community rehabilitation teams. BMC Health Services Research, 10(18). doi: 10.1186/1472-6962-10-18. Retrieved from https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6963-10-18

Murfet, G.O., Allen, P., & Hingston, T.J. (2014). Maternal and neonatal health outcomes following the implementation of an innovative model of nursepractitioner-led care for diabetes in pregnancy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(5), 1150-1163.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

NURS 8410 Week 9 Discussion: Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Initiatives

Discussion: Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Initiatives

The vice president of nursing, Dr. Sasha Mendez, has had a lot of complaints from patients and their families about the difficulties they experience navigating the system at her organization; e.g., going from the E.R. to admissions. Dr. Mendez’s nursing specialty area is psych/mental health. As such, she is very concerned about the stress this is causing the patients.

What are the macro systems that are affecting patient satisfaction at Dr. Mendez’s facility? What micro systems should she also analyze to look at how the patient moves through—from entry, to possible admission, to possible discharge? How do these systems relate? What impacts each system?

The concepts presented in Week 8 serve as a foundation for this week as you continue to look at factors within an organization’s environment that are barriers and facilitators for implementing change. In this Discussion, you examine the macro and micro systems within the organization (of your practicum setting) and identify changes that may need to take place to facilitate quality improvement and achievement of patient safety outcomes. NURS 8410 Week 9 Assignment 2: Application 5 – EBP.

To prepare for Discussion: Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Initiatives:

• Reflect on the issue you have been addressing through your EBP Assignment.
• Identify the macro and micro systems that influence the issue. Review the McClusky and Middleton (2010) article for an example of this process.
• Determine the desired outcomes of resolving the EBP Assignment issue and how resolving it will improve quality and patient safety. (Note: Next week you will evaluate these outcomes. You may want to view the Week 10 Discussion as you prepare.)
• What procedures/processes would need to be modified to achieve the desired outcomes?
• Develop a 5-slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation for the business unit team and leadership within the organization, sharing your issue, strategies for resolving the issue, and how it will improve quality and patient safety. Note: The purpose of the presentation is to persuade the business unit team and leadership to accept your recommendations.

By Day 3 of Discussion: Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Initiatives

Post your PowerPoint presentation.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6 of Discussion: Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Initiatives

Respond to two of your colleagues using the following scenario:

Imagine you are a manager from the business unit or leadership team who is also involved in your organization’s quality management committee. Employing this perspective, critique at least three of your colleagues’ presentations.

When critiquing your colleagues’ presentations be sure to:

• Determine the extent to which the PowerPoint presentation convinces you that the appropriate systems were examined and that the identified outcomes are attainable
• Provide feedback on whether you believe the suggested modifications to the systems will lead to the desired outcomes

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you learned and/or any insights you gained as a result of the comments made by your colleagues.

Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and any additional sources. NURS 8410 Week 9 Assignment 2: Application 5 – EBP.

Submission and Grading Information

NURS 8300 Week 10: The Application of Process Improvement Models in Organizations and Systems – Part II Recommendation

NURS 8300 Week 10: The Application of Process Improvement Models in Organizations and Systems – Part II Recommendation

NURS 8300 Week 10 – What separates a successful quality improvement initiative from those that fail to meet their goals? Frequently, it is the application of the process improvement model and development of a well thought-out plan of action.

This week continues the examination of how process improvement models are applied to create and sustain change at the organizational and policy level. You also consider how evidence-based practice models can be used for these same purposes.

Learning Objectives for NURS 8300 Week 10: The Application of Process Improvement Models in Organizations and Systems – Part II Recommendation

By the end of this week, you will be able to:

• Apply evidence-based practice models to an identified clinical practice problem
• Formulate recommendations and an action plan for a quality improvement initiative

Photo Credit: [Blend Images/ERproductions Ltd]/[Blend Images]/Getty Images

Learning Resources OF NURS 8300 Week 10

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Required Readings OF NURS 8300 Week 10: The Application of Process Improvement Models in Organizations and Systems – Part II Recommendation

Joshi, M.S., Ransom, E.R., Nash, D.B., & Ransom, S.B., (Eds.). (2014). The Healthcare Quality Book, 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: Health Adminisration Press.

• Chapter 14: “Leadership for Quality”
• Chapter 16: “Implementing Quality as the Core Organizational Strategy”

Baur, C. (2011). Calling the nation to act: Implementing the national action plan to improve health literacy. Nursing Outlook, 59(2), 63–69.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

This article describes the aspects of the National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy. It starts by covering the background and objectives of the plan and then moves to its vision and goals.

Ferrara, L. R. (2010). Integrating evidence-based practice with educational theory in clinical practice for nurse practitioners: Bridging the theory practice gap. Research & Theory for Nursing Practice, 24(4), 213–216.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

The author of this article discusses using constructivist theory to teach nurse practitioner students to use evidenced-based practice. She focuses on introducing the student’s theoretical knowledge into real-life practice.

Grant, B., Colello, S., Riehle, M., & Dende, D. (2010). An evaluation of the nursing practice environment and successful change management using the new generation Magnet Model. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(3), 326–331. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01076.x

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Health care organizations have implemented the Magnet Model as a way to successfully implement practice change. This article examines the aspects of this process.

Lavoie-Tremblay, M., Bonin, J.-P., Lesage, A., Farand, L., Lavigne, G. L., & Trudel, J. (2011). Implementation of diagnosis-related mental health problems: Impact on health care providers. Health Care Manager, 30(1), 30(1): 4-14 (50 ref). doi:10.1097/HCM.0b013e3182078a95

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

The study within this article analyzes two cases related to the implementation of diagnosis-related mental health programs.

Mark, D. D., Latimer, R. W., & Hardy, M. D. (2010). “Stars” aligned for evidence-based practice: a TriService initiative in the Pacific. Nursing Research, 59(1), S48–S57. doi:10.1097/01.NNR.0000313506.22722.53

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Nurses from a military health care system in Hawaii established ways to use and evaluate evidence-based practices. This article details the process and results of this collaborative effort between the Army, Air Force, and Navy.

Scobbie, L., Dixon, D., & Wyke, S. (2011). Goal setting and action planning in the rehabilitation setting: Development of a theoretically informed practice framework. Clinical Rehabilitation, 25(5), 468–482. doi:10.1177/0269215510389198

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

In order to develop a theory-based framework for setting goals, the authors of this article use casual modeling to determine effective patient outcomes. They identifies four major components of the framework that can be used to set effective goals.

Optional Resources FOR NURS 8300 Week 10

Schifalacqua, M. M., Mamula, J., & Mason, A. R. (2011). Return on investment imperative: the cost of care calculator for an evidence-based practice program. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 15–20.

NURS 8300 Week 10 Discussion: Welcome to the Week 10 Small Group Discussion Area!

Note: Week 10 is a group assignment. Last week, you explored key factors that contribute to patient safety challenges using root cause analysis. This week builds on that foundational awareness with a focus on the application of evidence-based practice models as a strategy to improve patient safety and other quality dimensions. In this Discussion, consider how these strategies can sustain practice changes.

Week 10 is a group assignment. Last week, you explored key factors that contribute to patient safety challenges using root cause analysis. This week builds on that foundational awareness with a focus on the application of evidence-based practice models as a strategy to improve patient safety and other quality dimensions. In this Discussion, consider how these strategies can sustain practice changes.

To prepare:

Read: Newhouse, R.P. (2007) Diffusing confusion among evidence-based practice, quality improvement and research. JONA 37,432-535

Read: Mazurek Melynk B., Gallagher-Ford, L., English Long, L., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2014) The establishment of Evidence-Based practice competencies for practicing registered nurses and advanced practice nurses in real world clinical settings: proficiencies to improve healthcare quality, reliability, patient outcomes, and costs. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing 11(1),5-15.

We all agree that research is the highest form of reliable evidence, when implemented in an organization that provides the basis for an evidence based practice. As a group: FIND a research study published in a peer reviewed journal related to a clinical practice problem that is of interest to the group, and which would ultimately contribute to an evidence based practice.

The discussion assignment:

ANSWER the following discussion questions as a group: (as a team, post your responses by Sunday at midnight). Include the research study in your post (attach it to the post and post it in doc sharing). See page 11 #15 in Mazurek Melynk, Gallagher Ford, English Long and Fineout-Overholt. In this assignment, you are being asked to critically appraise a single research study for its relevance to a QI practice problem.

Each member of the team must participate (weekly rules for discussion) on the group discussion board in order to get full credit.

Discussion questions:

• What was the purpose of the research?
• Identify the independent and dependent variables in the study.
• Briefly describe the research design, data collection method(s), and instruments used to measure the variables under study.
• Briefly summarize study findings, conclusions and recommendations. Do you agree with these?
• As a DNP prepared nurse, would you recommend a change in nursing practice based on the study? Defend and/or justify your decision based on research evaluation principles. In other words, does the evidence generated by this research article signify a need to change nursing practice? If not, why not; if so, why?

By Day 3

Post your team’s answers in the form of a main post on your group discussion board. Each member of the group must participate in week 10 in order to receive the grade.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric: Week 10 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 7

To participate in this Discussion: Groups Area

Assignment: IHI School Modules

By Week 9 you should have completed 13 IHI Open School Modules.

There is nothing to submit this week.

Week in Review

This week you applied evidence-based practice models to an identified clinical practice problem and formulated recommendations and an action plan for a quality improvement initiative. In the final week you will appraise measurement mechanisms to evaluate change in organizations and systems, and evaluate the success of quality improvement initiatives in terms of sustainability. Additionally, you will engage in self-assessment and reflection to evaluate your own leadership skills and preferences.

NURS 8210N-1 Week 1 Assignment: Application 1 – Nursing Informatics Pioneers

NURS 8210N-1 Week 1 Assignment: Application 1 – Nursing Informatics Pioneers

Introduction to Health Information Technology Systems and Nursing Informatics

Application 1: Nursing Informatics Pioneers – One of the major drivers in recent health care reform legislation is the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act’s (ARRA) HiTech Incentive. This act, passed in 2009, earmarked $22 billion for the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), with a goal of 100% adoption in all practice settings by the year 2014. The HiTech Act provides an example of the pivotal role that health information technology plays in the delivery of quality health care services. Yet, health information technology is a relatively new field. This Application Assignment provides an opportunity for you to examine the contributions of pioneers in this arena and consider how their contributions have influenced health informatics and nursing practice today.

To prepare FOR NURS 8210N-1 Week 1 Assignment: Application 1 – Nursing Informatics Pioneers:

• Visit the AMIA Video Library 1: Nursing Informatics Pioneers webpage listed in the Learning Resources.
• Review the biographies and video presentations of pioneers who are of interest to you, or may hold a position that you aspire to achieve.
• Select two nursing informatics pioneers and conduct further research on their contributions.
• Consider how their contributions have influenced health information technology and nursing practice today.

By Day 7 of Week 2 OF NURS 8210N-1 Week 1 Assignment: Application 1 – Nursing Informatics Pioneers

Write a scholarly 3- to 4-page paper comparing two nursing informatics pioneers. Synthesize your thoughts using the bullets below as a guide:

• What are the professional accomplishments of each individual?
• How have their contributions influenced nursing practice?
• How have their contributions shaped the field of nursing informatics?
• What lessons can you take away from their experiences?
• What skills or ideas demonstrated by these leaders might you apply to your professional practice?

NURS 8210N-1 Discussion: Welcome to the Week 1 Small Group Discussion area!

Post your responses to the Small Group Discussion based on the course requirements.

Your Discussion postings should be written in standard edited English and follow APA guidelines as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Essential Guide to APA Style for Walden Students to ensure your in-text citations and reference list are correct. Initial postings must be 250–350 words (not including references).

NURS 8210N-1 Week 1: Staying Current

Print and web-based media provide many rich and credible resources for staying abreast of the latest trends and issues in health care. As you proceed through the DNP program, you will find that receiving updates via the Internet or mail can continue to support your professional growth as a scholar practitioner.

To prepare FOR NURS 8210N-1 Week 1 Assignment: Application 1 – Nursing Informatics Pioneers:

• Review several resources that provide current information about the latest trends and issues in health care
• Select one that you think is most appropriate for you to stay current on the latest trends and issues in health care

By Day 7

• Subscribe to the resource you selected
• Copy and paste an email or photo of your successful subscription notification/confirmation into a Word document and submit it to the submission link by Day 7.
• NOTE: You are expected to maintain your subscription throughout this course. Review several of the updates you receive to inform your Discussions and Application Assignments.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

• Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK1Proj+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
• Click the Week 1 Project link.
• Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK1Proj+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
• If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
• Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

NURS 8210N-1Week 1: Introduction to Health Information Technology Systems and Nursing Informatics

In 1943, Tom Watson was quoted as saying, “I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.” Little did this chairman of IBM realize that the advent of computers would revolutionize all facets of society, including health care. The health care industry has used the power of technology to dramatically improve the quality of patient care. Today, bar code scanners document patient medications, robotic machinery is used to perform minimally invasive surgeries, and pill bottles feature audible labels to assist patients in taking the correct medication. As health care continues to change and new innovations appear, what types of skills will nurses need in order to harness the potential of emerging and evolving technologies?

This week you will examine the history of nursing informatics as well as the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) initiatives that drive technology education for nurses. Using the TIGER and American Nurses Association guidelines, you also evaluate your own informatics competencies.

Reference: Rinkworks. (n.d.) Things people said: Bad predictions. Retrieved from http://www.rinkworks.com/said/predictions.shtml

Learning Objectives

Students will:

• Summarize how informatics has impacted or changed nursing practice
• Evaluate the influence of informatics competencies on quality of care and nursing practice
• Apply online learning resources to professional growth and development
• Compare the contributions of two nursing informatics pioneers

Photo Credit: [Comstock]/[Stockbyte]/Getty Images

Learning Resources

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

Required Readings

Course Text: Ball, M. J., Douglas, J. V., Hinton Walker, P., DuLong, D., Gugerty, B., Hannah, K. J., . . . Troseth, M. R. (Eds.) (2011). Nursing informatics: Where technology and caring meet (4th ed.). London, England: Springer-Verlag.

• Chapter 1, “Nursing Informatics: Transforming Nursing”
• Chapter 12, “The Evolving National Informatics Landscape”

Chapter 1 introduces the need for health care reform by detailing cost concerns and future needs of the nursing profession. A look at the beginning stages of the TIGER collaborative is also given, detailing its start at the 2006 Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences in Bethesda, Maryland. Chapter 12 provides an overview of technology’s emergence into the health care industry. Course Text: American Nurses Association. (2008). Nursing informatics: Scope and standards of practice. Silver Spring, MD: Author.

• “Introduction” (pp. 1–2)
• “Informatics Competencies” (pp. 33–40)

The 2-page excerpt from the introduction offers a brief description of the field of informatics and presents the rationale for referring to the scope and standards throughout your nursing career. The excerpt from the “Informatics Competencies” section uses research and matrices to correlate informatics competencies with the education and roles of nursing professionals.

Cesnik, B., & Kidd, M. R. (2010). History of health informatics: A global perspective. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 151, 3–8. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

The authors of this article begin by summarizing the rise of computer development and use. They then examine how technology will build the capabilities of future businesses.

Hovenga, E. J., Kidd, M. R., Garde, S., & Hullin Lucay Cossio, C. (2010). Health informatics: An introduction. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 151, 9–15. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

A brief explanation of informatics principles is given in this article.

Ozbolt, J. G., & Saba, V. K. (2008). A brief history of nursing informatics in the United States of America. Nursing Outlook, 56(5), 199–205. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Examine the initiatives and technological developments that have informed the field of informatics by using this article as a guide.

Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER). (n.d.). The TIGER Initiative: Informatics competencies for every practicing nurse: Recommendations from the TIGER collaborative. Retrieved from: http://www.mhsinformatics.org/CI-Fellowship/Workforce-Development/Competencies/Tiger.Report_Competencies_final.pdf

For this week, focus on the executive summary and Appendix A, B, and C for review of the TIGER initiative and resulting competencies.

Required Media

Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2011). Transforming nursing and healthcare through technology: What is health informatics? Baltimore, MD: Author. Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 13 minutes. In this week’s media presentation, the presenters discuss the extensive applications, implications, and benefits of health informatics for patients, practitioners, and health care organizations as a whole.  

Accessible player –Downloads– Download Video w/CC Download Audio Download Transcript

HIMSS/AMDIS Physician Community Podcast Series. (Producer). (2009). Episode #15: TIGER initiative – technology informatics guiding education reform. [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.himss.org/episode-15-tiger-initiative-technology-informatics-guiding-education-reform Joyce Sensmeier, vice president of informatics at the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), presents the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) initiative that is aimed at educating nurses on new digital technologies. This podcast also highlights the organizational accomplishments and future informatics goals of the TIGER initiative.

To access the podcast, scroll through the page linked above to find Episode #15. American Medical Informatics Association. (2011). Video Library 1: Nursing informatics pioneers. Retrieved from http://www.amia.org/programs/working-groups/nursing-informatics/history-project/video-library-1 The AMIA developed a Nursing Informatics History Project, aimed at documenting and preserving the history of nursing informatics. This project consists of two video libraries. Video Library 1 portrays the viewpoints and accomplishments of those recognized as pioneers in the informatics field.

Optional Resources for NURS 8210N-1 Week 1 Assignment: Application 1 – Nursing Informatics Pioneers

Gugerty, B. Delaney, C. (August, 2009). Technology Informatics Guiding Educational Reform (TIGER). TIGER Informatics Competencies Collaborative (TICC) Final Report. Retrieved from http://tigercompetencies.pbworks.com/f/TICC_Final.pdf Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER). (n.d.). Evidence and Informatics Transforming Nursing: 3-Year Action Steps toward a 10-Year Vision. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/TIGER.pdf