Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Evaluation Table

The purpose of this assignment is to write a review of the research articles you evaluated in your Topic 5 “Evidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation of Literature” assignment. If you have been directed by your instructor to select different articles in order to meet the requirements for a literature review or to better support your evidence-based practice project proposal, complete this step prior to writing your review.

A literature review provides a concise comparison of the literature for the reader and explains how the research demonstrates support for your PICOT. You will use the literature review in this assignment in NUR-590, during which you will write a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

In a paper of 1,250-1,500, select eight of the ten articles you evaluated that demonstrate clear support for your evidence-based practice and complete the following for each article:

Introduction – Describe the clinical issue or problem you are addressing. Present your PICOT statement.
Search methods – Describe your search strategy and the criteria that you used in choosing and searching for your articles.
Synthesis of the literature – For each article, write a paragraph discussing the main components (subjects, methods, key findings) and provide rationale for how the article supports your PICOT.
Comparison of articles – Compare the articles (similarities and differences, themes, methods, conclusions, limitations, controversies).
Suggestions for future research: Based on your analysis of the literature, discuss identified gaps and which areas require further research.
Conclusion – Provide a summary statement of what you found in the literature.
Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite eight peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Evaluation Table

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences): PICOT Analysis. Generally, a high level of patient satisfaction for the clients in the emergency department (ED) is vital, especially at this time when the healthcare system is shifting towards patient-centered care. Utilization of RTLS in the hospital’s ED, compared to manually-entered status updates to tract patients, help decrease the rate of LWBT and to raise revenue collection within 6 months, for ED patients with decreasing satisfaction levels with the provided healthcare services. This is as from the articles discussed below.

Criteria	Article 1	Article 2	Article 3	Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article	Asamrew, N., Endris, A. A., & Tadesse, M. /orders/www.hindawi.com/journals/jeph/2020/2473469/	sheim, A., Nilsen, S. M., Carlsen, F., Næss-Pleym, L. E., Uleberg, O., Dale, J., et al. /orders/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31135613/	Boehm, L., & Petty, K. /orders/vocera.com/sites/default/files/resources/CXO_Survey_2016_Report_Vocera_Experience_Innovation_Network.pdf	Boulos, M. N., & Berry, G. /orders/ij-healthgeographics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1476-072X-11-25
Article Title and Year Published	Level of Patient Satisfaction with Inpatient Services and Its Determinants: A Study of a Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia. (2020)	The Effect Of Emergency Department Delays On 30-Day Mortality in Central Norway. (2019)	The Rise of the Healthcare Chief Experience Officer. Vocera’s Experience Innovation Network. (2016)	Real-Time Locating Systems (RTLS) In Healthcare: A Condensed Primer. (2012)
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)	The level of patient satisfaction is a determinant for quality of care.	Is prolonged ED stay associated with increased risk of death?	Focus on human experience of care supports highest healing potential.	The article addresses RTLS application in healthcare.
Purposes/Aim of Study	Measuring the level of patient satisfaction and its determinants.	To assess whether prolonged length of stay in ED was associated with risk of death.	To examine whether the chief experience officer can enable humanized care delivery.	The paper evaluates if RTLS options, solutions, and deployment have benefits.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)	Quantitative	Experimental	Mixed research	Qualitative research
Setting/Sample	In hospital	out of hospital	out of hospital	In hospital
Methods: Intervention/Instruments	Facility-related domain, general facility amenities, and provider interaction.	Indicators on risk of death, discharge, and hospitalization length.	Leader experience in achieving quality, safety, and performance.	RTLS components and technologies.
Analysis	Increasing needs and demands of the patients influence suitability of satisfaction levels. Assessing patient satisfaction through various inpatient services can lead to measurement of care quality. Increased engagements with the healthcare provider can shape perceptions impacting satisfaction.	Patients arriving and been admitted in hospitals ED have expectations of staying longer in the hospital after admission. This can have an impact on their satisfaction and confidence depending on the length of hospitalization.	Priorities established by the leader demonstrate commitment to excellence and patient care. The care entails safety through performance improvement. Experience improvement is based on patient and family involvement in care, staff support, and support technologies enabling satisfaction.	RTLS in healthcare tracks emergency first response by hospitals and providers. The technology exploits real-time location and status information of tracked entities. In the ED the technology provide timely responses to patients. Care providers would receive timely information on patients, rooms, their stay in hospital, and needs.
Key Findings	Determinants/ predictors used ought to create perceptions on satisfaction levels. Interactions with the care provider as well as facility amenities (toilet cleanliness, accommodation, and dietary service) are key predictors in satisfaction levels.	Prolonged stays in the ED were associated with discharges from the hospital. This reduced the association between increased risk of death and hospitalization.	Building a sense of community and satisfaction of all shareholders considers the experiences created. Patient care strategies are highly facilitated by humanized care leadership strategies enabling healing and satisfaction.	The technology can be integrated with other in-place technologies to communicate in real-time in providing quick responses. The solutions offered consider tagged locations with precision to locate rooms and needy patients.
Recommendations	Periodic assessments to be carried out. Improvement and job-training of health providers. Hospital reformation and modernization. Improvements in facility amenities. Improvements in client-patient interactions.	Improvements in care quality to shape patient perceptions.	Adopting new measures on healthcare humanity. Accepting advanced technology in hardwiring humanity. Patients setting course for experience improvements. Seamless patient journeys across the care continuum.	Improvements within the capabilities of the technology. Careful vendor selection in hardware and software support. Careful technology selection as per intended application.
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project	The article offers evidence on the need to establish variables as predictors to patient satisfaction.	The article supports the capstone project by articulating how quality care can influence satisfaction reducing risk of death.	The article offers evidence-based practice on experience and technology incorporation to facilitate patient satisfaction.	The article offer substantial evidence on RTLS technology.

Criteria	Article 5	Article 6	Article 7	Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article	Drazen, E., & Rhoads, J. /orders/www.chcf.org/publication/using-tracking-tools-to-improve-patient-flow-in-hospitals/	Heath, S. /orders/patientengagementhit.com/features/patient-satisfaction-and-hcahps-what-it-means-for-providers	Prakash, B. /orders/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3047732/	Son, H., & Yom, Y.-H. /orders/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jjns.12132
Article Title and Year Published	Using Tracking Tools to Improve Patient Flow in Hospitals. (2011)	Patient Satisfaction and HCAHPS: What It Means for Providers. (2016)	Patient Satisfaction. (2010)	Influencing Satisfaction With Emergency Department Medical Service: Patients’And Their Companions’Perspectives. (2017)
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)	Usage of tracking tools can be effective in improving patient flow in hospitals.	Understanding patient satisfaction through consumer assessment survey enabled in hospitals.	Patient satisfaction is an indicator of doctor or hospital performance.	Consumer satisfaction can be applied as a barometer for the improvement of service quality.
Purposes/Aim of Study	To examine tracking technologies and techniques available to hospitals.	To explore hospital quality and patient satisfaction through 27 questions to patient recent stay in hospital.	To evaluate if patient satisfaction can be used to measure quality of care.	To examine the individual determinants that influence satisfaction with services at the ED and compare factors that influence satisfaction compared with their companions.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)	Qualitative	Experimental	Descriptive analysis	Cross-sectional study design
Setting/Sample	Out of hospital	out of hospital setting	Out hospital setting	Household setting
Methods: Intervention/Instruments	Tracking technologies and techniques	Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey.	Patient satisfaction in practice building.	Individual factors influencing satisfaction.
Analysis	Hospitals are expected to meet growing patient volumes. This would enable providers to satisfy patients in various stages of treatment through technologies.	Client satisfaction information in the ED department can streamline workflow. While technology can be applied to enhance the satisfaction, providers are required to provide technical quality in care delivery.	Assessment of quality from a report published in 2001 showed how patient satisfaction can be used to shape healthcare practice. The doctor, patient, and organization are important factors in service excellence.	Through regression analysis, the results depicted predictors of satisfaction in the ED for patients and companions. Core domains in satisfaction entailed age, gender, and employment of the patient. Companions with lower education levels and visited due to patient illness were more satisfied.
Key Findings	Patient-tracking technologies help providers by providing real-time information on patients. The information is used to mould workflow enabling customization to fit patient and organization needs.	Social rapport built creates both trust and satisfaction to the parties. However, providers should consider authentic engagement for deeper connections. This has regards to reduced computer usage.	Even if patient satisfaction is an attitude, it determines patient loyalty to the doctor and the hospital. Patient-focuses care provided is expected to meet expectations besides ensuring the organizations strives to provide better care. The satisfaction can act as an indicator to quality care.	Active communication between care providers and patients or companions can help in predicting patient satisfaction. Communication in the ED is important to keep visitors satisfied and cared for.
Recommendations	Technology benefits should fit organizational and patient needs to yield outcomes.	Face to face interaction in patient engagement. Create authentic engagements with patients.	Doctors and hospitals should strive to provide better care and exceed patient expectations.	Assessment of the waiting period as a determinant of patient satisfaction.
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone	The article will be utilized to educate how tracking technology integration can be used to promote best practices.	The article also emphasizes the efficiency provider-patient engagement for satisfaction.	The article evaluates patient satisfaction as an element in improving quality of care.	The article offers substantial information on patient satisfaction determinants across ED settings.

Criteria	Article 9	Article 10	Article 11
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article	Wand, T., Crawford, C., Bell, N., Murphy, M., White, K., & Wood, E. /orders/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31047855/	Wang, H., Kline, J. A., Jackson, B. A., Robinson, R. D., Sullivan, M., Holmes, M., et al. /orders/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31047855/	Xesfingi, S., & Vozikis, A. /orders/bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-016-1327-4
Article Title and Year Published	Documenting The Pre-Implementation Phase For A Multi-Site Translational Research Project To Test A New Model Emergency Department-Based Mental Health Nursing Care. (2019)	The Role Of Patient Perception Of Crowding In The Determination Of Real-Time Patient Satisfaction At Emergency Department (2017)	Patient Satisfaction With The Healthcare System: Assessing The Impact Of Socio-Economic And Healthcare Provision Factors. (2016)
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)	Reorientation of health services and resources can meet change in demand in ED for people with mental health, drug health, and behavioural problems.	Is overcrowding in the ED associated with lower real-time patient satisfaction?	Patient satisfaction is an important measure in healthcare quality.
Purposes/Aim of Study	To implement and evaluate an innovative model of mental health nursing care in three EDs across New South Wales Australia.	Evaluate the associations between real-time patient satisfaction and ED crowding as determined by patient perception and crowding estimation tool score in a high-volume ED.	To assess the degree of patient satisfaction and study the relationship between patient satisfaction of health system and set of socio-economic and healthcare provision indicators.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)	Qualitative mixed methods design	Observational study design	Descriptive analysis
Setting/Sample	In hospital setting	In hospital setting	In hospital setting
Methods: Intervention/Instruments	Timeliness of consultations, documentation processes, delays in decisions, and lengthy assessment.	National emergency department overcrowding scale (NEDOCS) and Severely overcrowded not overcrowded Estimation tool (SONET).	Satisfaction index and healthcare provision indicators.
Analysis	Increased patients rates in EDs dealing with mental, drug, and behavioral problems are due to staff frustrations. Existing models on the practice constitute reasons leading to the frustrations.	Analysis of the observed data to create comparisons between overcrowded and not overcrowded associations with patient satisfaction.	Included data from Euro Health Consumer Powerhouse based on literature indicators. The information regarded the years 2007 to 2012 on hospital performance from patient perceptions.
Key Findings	Adopting and implementing new models of care can reduce frustrations and improve patient satisfaction. This would impact staff willingness to support change and corporate in the implementation of innovative practice models.	Higher degrees of crowding and overcrowding at the ED during patient admission lowered patient satisfaction levels.	Patient satisfaction levels and healthcare provision indicators have a strong association in the ED. In addition, socio-economic aspects shape patient satisfaction levels. Patients on public health expenditures and the elderly are observed to be more satisfied with the country’s healthcare system.
Recommendations	Adoption and implementation of new models with a consideration of applicability and suitability of the EDs.	Hospitals to reduce ED crowding to enhance client satisfaction.	Further evaluations on the construction of the satisfaction index. Focus on country-level analysis.
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone	The article will be utilized to educate on how innovative changes can be useful in the ED.	The article also emphasizes the efficiency patient satisfaction from reduced ED crowding.	The article evaluates the association between patient satisfaction and quality provision of healthcare as per current improvements in

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
NUR-550	NUR-550-O500	Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Review	175.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%)	Satisfactory (88.00%)	Good (92.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Introduction	5.0%	The clinical issue or problem and PICOT statement are omitted.	The clinical issue or problem and PICOT statement are incomplete or incorrect.	The clinical issue or problem and PICOT statement are presented. Some aspects are vague. There are minor inaccuracies.	The clinical issue or problem and PICOT statement are adequately described.	The clinical issue or problem and PICOT statement are thoroughly described.
Search Methods	10.0%	The search strategy and criteria used in choosing and searching for articles are omitted.	The search strategy and criteria used in choosing and searching for articles are only partially described.	The search strategy and criteria used in choosing and searching for articles are summarized. More information is needed.	The search strategy and criteria used in choosing and searching for articles are described. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.	The search strategy and criteria used in choosing and searching for articles is thoroughly described.
Synthesis of Literature	10.0%	A paragraph for one or more article is missing.	All articles are presented, but the synthesis of literature is incomplete.	A summary for each article is presented. The main components (subjects, methods, key findings) are generally discussed. General rationale for how each article supports the PICOT is provided. More information is needed.	A paragraph for each article is presented. The main components (subjects, methods, key findings) are adequately discussed, and rationale for how each article supports the PICOT is provided. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.	A well-developed paragraph for each article is presented. The main components (subjects, methods, key findings) are thoroughly discussed, and substantial rationale for how each article supports the PICOT is clearly provided.
Comparison of Articles	10.0%	One or more article is missing in the comparison.	All articles are presented, but the comparison is incomplete.	A general comparison of the similarities, differences, themes, methods, conclusions, limitations, and controversies among the articles is presented. Some aspects are unclear. More information is needed.	A comparison of the similarities, differences, themes, methods, conclusions, limitations, and controversies among the articles is adequately presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.	A detailed comparison of the similarities, differences, themes, methods, conclusions, limitations, and controversies among the articles is thoroughly presented.
Suggestions for Future Research	10.0%	Identified gaps and areas requiring further research are omitted.	Identified gaps and areas requiring further research are only partially presented.	Some identified gaps and areas requiring further research are generally discussed. The narrative is generally based on the analysis of the literature. More information is needed.	Identified gaps and areas requiring further research are adequately discussed. The narrative is based on the analysis of the literature. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.	Identified gaps and areas requiring further research are thoroughly discussed and clearly based on the analysis of the literature. The narrative is insightful and demonstrates an understanding of research analysis necessary for future study.
Conclusion	5.0%	The conclusion is omitted.	A conclusion is presented but fails to present a summary statement of what was found in the literature.	The conclusion presents a vague summary statement of was found in the literature. There are inaccuracies.	The conclusion presents an adequate summary statement of what was found in the literature.	The conclusion is well-developed and presents a clear and accurate summary statement of what was found in the literature.
Ability to Analyze (C3.2)	10.0%	The literature review presented does not demonstrate an ability to analyze appropriate research from databases and other information sources to improve health care practices and processes.	The literature review presented does not consistently demonstrate an ability to analyze appropriate research from databases and other information sources to improve health care practices and processes.	The literature review presented demonstrates a general ability to analyze appropriate research from databases and other information sources to improve health care practices and processes.	The literature review presented demonstrates an adequate ability to analyze appropriate research from databases and other information sources to improve health care practices and processes.	The literature review presented demonstrates a strong ability to analyze appropriate research from databases and other information sources to improve health care practices and processes.
Appendix	5.0%	The appendix and required resources are omitted.	The APA Writing Checklist is attached, but an appendix has not been created. The paper does not reflect the use of the APA Writing Checklist during development	The APA Writing Checklist is attached and in the appendix. The APA Writing Checklist was generally used in development of the paper, but some aspects are inconsistent with the paper format or quality.	The APA Writing Checklist is attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development of the paper.	The APA Writing Checklist is attached in the appendix. It is clearly evident by the quality of the paper that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development.
Required Sources	5.0%	Sources are not included.	Number of required sources is only partially met.	Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.	Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.	Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Who We Are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Evaluation Table

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Evaluation Table

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Guarantee
Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Evaluation Table

Zero Plagiarism
On-time delivery
A-Grade Papers
Free Revision
24/7 Support
100% Confidentiality
Professional Writers

Services Offered

Custom paper writing
Question and answers
Essay paper writing
Editing and proofreading
Plagiarism removal services
Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Nursing Assignment Owl

Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Evaluation Table

Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Evaluation Table

Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Evaluation Table

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Benchmark -Evidence-Based Practice Project: Literature Evaluation Table

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

You're in safe hands

Don't miss out on this exclusive offer

We have all your Nursing Assignment Needs Covered.