NURS6630 week 1 discussion

NURS6630 week 1 discussion latest

NURS6630 week 1 discussion.

week_1_discussion.docx (133.21 KB)

Week 1
discussion

Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience
As a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner, it is
essential for you to have a strong background in foundational neuroscience. In
order to diagnose and treat clients, you must not only understand the
pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders, but also how medications for these
disorders impact the central nervous system. These concepts of foundational
neuroscience can be challenging to understand. Therefore, this Discussion is
designed to encourage you to think through these concepts, develop a rationale
for your thinking, and deepen your understanding by interacting with your
colleagues.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Analyze the agonist-to-antagonist spectrum of action of
psychopharmacologic agents
Compare the actions of g couple proteins to ion gated
channels
Analyze the role of epigenetics in pharmacologic action
Analyze the impact of foundational neuroscience on the
prescription of medications
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources,
please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course
Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Note: All Stahl
resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using this link. This link
will take you to a log-in page for the Walden Library. Once you log into the
library, the Stahl website will appear.
Stahl, S. M. (2013).
Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical
applications (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press *Preface, pp.
ix–x
Note: To access the following chapters, click on the
Essential Psychopharmacology, 4th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select
the appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation
bar for each chapter.
Chapter 1, “Chemical Neurotransmission”
Chapter 2, “Transporters, Receptors, and Enzymes as Targets
of Psychopharmacologic Drug Action”
Chapter 3, “Ion Channels as Targets of Psychopharmacologic
Drug Action”
Document: Midterm
Exam Study Guide (PDF)
Document: Final Exam
Study Guide (PDF)
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2016i). Introduction to
psychopharmacology [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate
length of this media piece is 3 minutes.
Accessible player
Optional Resources
Laureate Education (Producer). (2009). Pathopharmacology:
Disorders of the nervous system: Exploring the human brain [Video file].
Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate
length of this media piece is 15 minutes.
Dr. Myslinski reviews the structure and function of the
human brain. Using human brains, he examines and illustrates the development of
the brain and areas impacted by disorders associated with the brain.
Accessible player
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012). Introduction to
advanced pharmacology [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate
length of this media piece is 8 minutes.
In this media presentation, Dr. Terry Buttaro, associate
professor of practice at Simmons School of Nursing and Health Sciences,
discusses the importance of pharmacology for the advanced practice nurse.
Accessible player
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review this week’s Learning Resources.
Reflect on concepts of foundational neuroscience.

NURS6630 week 10 discussion

NURS6630 week 10 discussion latest

NURS6630 week 10 discussion.

week_10_discussion.docx (92.21 KB)

Week 10
discussion

Discussion: Influencing Social Change
Individuals with psychiatric mental health disorders are
frequently stigmatized not only by society as a whole, but also by their
friends, family, and sometimes healthcare providers. In your role, however, you
have the opportunity to become a social change agent for these individuals. For
this Discussion, consider how you might make a positive impact for your clients
and advocate for social change within your own community.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Apply strategies to become a social change agent for
psychiatric mental health
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources,
please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course
Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Angermeyer, M. C.,
Matschinger, H., & Schomerus, G. (2013). Attitudes towards psychiatric
treatment and people with mental illness: Changes over two decades. The British
Journal of Psychiatry, 203(2), 146–151. Retrieved from
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/203/2/146.full
Bui, Q. (2012).
Antidepressants for agitation and psychosis in patients with dementia. American
Family Physician, 85(1), 20–22. Retrieved from
http://www.aafp.org/journals/afp.html
Note: Retrieved from from the Walden Library databases.
Dingfelder, S. F.
(2009). Stigma: Alive and well. American Psychological Association, 40(6), 56.
Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/monitor/2009/06/stigma.aspx
Jenkins, J. H.
(2012). The anthropology of psychopharmacology: Commentary on contributions to
the analysis of pharmaceutical self and imaginary. Culture, Medicine and
Psychiatry, 36(1), 78–79. doi:10.1007/s11013-012-9248-0
Note: Retrieved from from the Walden Library databases.
Price, L. H. (2010). Violence in America: Is
psychopharmacology the answer? Brown University Psychopharmacology Update,
21(5), 5. Retrieved from
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1556-7532
Note: Retrieved from from the Walden Library databases.
Optional Resources
Bennett, T. (2015).
Changing the way society understands mental health. National Alliance on Mental
Illness. Retrieved from
http://www.nami.org/Blogs/NAMI-Blog/April-2015/Changing-The-Way-Society-Understands-Mental-Health
Mechanic, D. (2007).
Mental health services then and now. Health Affairs, 26(6), 1548–1550.
Retrieved from
/orders/web.archive.org/web/20170605094514/http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/26/6/1548.full
Rothman, D. J.
(1994). Shiny, happy people: The problem with “cosmetic
psychopharmacology.” New Republic, 210(7), 34–38.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Reflect on how you might influence social change for
psychiatric mental health.

NURS6630 all week discussions latest

NURS6630 all week discussions latest 

NURS6630 all week discussions.

Week 1
discussion

Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience
As a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner, it is
essential for you to have a strong background in foundational neuroscience. In
order to diagnose and treat clients, you must not only understand the
pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders, but also how medications for these
disorders impact the central nervous system. These concepts of foundational
neuroscience can be challenging to understand. Therefore, this Discussion is
designed to encourage you to think through these concepts, develop a rationale
for your thinking, and deepen your understanding by interacting with your
colleagues.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Analyze the agonist-to-antagonist spectrum of action of
psychopharmacologic agents
Compare the actions of g couple proteins to ion gated
channels
Analyze the role of epigenetics in pharmacologic action
Analyze the impact of foundational neuroscience on the
prescription of medications
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources,
please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course
Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Note: All Stahl
resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using this link. This link
will take you to a log-in page for the Walden Library. Once you log into the
library, the Stahl website will appear.
Stahl, S. M. (2013).
Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical
applications (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press *Preface, pp.
ix–x
Note: To access the following chapters, click on the
Essential Psychopharmacology, 4th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select
the appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation
bar for each chapter.
Chapter 1, “Chemical Neurotransmission”
Chapter 2, “Transporters, Receptors, and Enzymes as Targets
of Psychopharmacologic Drug Action”
Chapter 3, “Ion Channels as Targets of Psychopharmacologic
Drug Action”
Document: Midterm
Exam Study Guide (PDF)
Document: Final Exam
Study Guide (PDF)
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2016i). Introduction to
psychopharmacology [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate
length of this media piece is 3 minutes.
Accessible player
Optional Resources
Laureate Education (Producer). (2009). Pathopharmacology:
Disorders of the nervous system: Exploring the human brain [Video file].
Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate
length of this media piece is 15 minutes.
Dr. Myslinski reviews the structure and function of the
human brain. Using human brains, he examines and illustrates the development of
the brain and areas impacted by disorders associated with the brain.
Accessible player
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012). Introduction to
advanced pharmacology [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate
length of this media piece is 8 minutes.
In this media presentation, Dr. Terry Buttaro, associate
professor of practice at Simmons School of Nursing and Health Sciences,
discusses the importance of pharmacology for the advanced practice nurse.
Accessible player
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review this week’s Learning Resources.
Reflect on concepts of foundational neuroscience.
Week 3
discussion

Discussion: The Impact of Ethnicity on Antidepressant
Therapy
Major depressive disorder is one of the most prevalent
disorders you will see in clinical practice. Treatment for this disorder,
however, can vary greatly depending on client factors, such as ethnicity and
culture. As a psychiatric mental health professional, you must understand the
influence of these factors to select appropriate psychopharmacologic
interventions. For this Discussion, consider how you might assess and treat the
individuals in the case studies based on the provided client factors, including
ethnicity and culture.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Assess client factors and history to develop personalized
plans of antidepressant therapy for adult and geriatric clients
Analyze factors that influence pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic processes in adult and geriatric clients requiring
antidepressant therapy
Analyze the impact of ethnicity on antidepressant therapy
Evaluate efficacy of treatment plans
Apply knowledge of providing care to adult and geriatric
clients presenting for antidepressant therapy
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources,
please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course
Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Note: All Stahl
resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using this link. This link
will take you to a log-in page for the Walden Library. Once you log into the
library, the Stahl website will appear.
Stahl, S. M. (2013).
Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical
applications (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Note: To access the following chapters, click on the
Essential Psychopharmacology, 4th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select
the appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation
bar for each chapter.
Chapter 7, “Antidepressants”
Stahl, S. M. (2014b). The prescriber’s guide (5th ed.). New
York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Note: To access the following medications, click on the The
Prescriber’s Guide, 5th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select the
appropriate medication.
Review the following medications:
amitriptyline
bupropion
citalopram
clomipramine
desipramine
desvenlafaxine
doxepin
duloxetine
escitalopram
fluoxetine
fluvoxamine
imipramine
ketamine
mirtazapine
nortriptyline
paroxetine
selegiline
sertraline
trazodone
venlafaxine
vilazodone
vortioxetine
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and
statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
Howland, R. H. (2008a). Sequenced treatment alternatives to
relieve depression (STAR*D). Part 1: Study design. Journal of Psychosocial
Nursing and Mental Health Services, 46(9), 21–24.
doi:10.3928/02793695-20080901-06
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
Howland, R. H. (2008a). Sequenced treatment alternatives to
relieve depression (STAR*D). Part 2: Study outcomes. Journal of Psychosocial
Nursing and Mental Health Services, 46(19), 21–24.
doi:10.3928/02793695-20081001-05
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
Yasuda, S.U., Zhang,
L. & Huang, S.-M. (2008). The role of ethnicity in variability in response
to drugs: Focus on clinical pharmacology studies. Clinical Pharmacology &
Therapeutics, 84(3), 417–423. Retrieved from
/orders/web.archive.org/web/20170809004704//orders/www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/ScienceResearch/…/UCM085502.pdf
To prepare for this Discussion:
Note: By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will have
assigned you to one of the following case studies to review for this
Discussion. To access the following case studies, click on the Case Studies tab
on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate volume and case number.
Case 1: Volume 1, Case #1: The man whose antidepressants
stopped working
Case 2: Volume 1, Case #7: The case of physician do not heal
thyself
Case 3: Volume 1, Case #29: The depressed man who thought he
was out of options
Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the
insights they provide.
Go to the Stahl Online website and examine the case study
you were assigned.
Take the pretest for the case study.
Review the patient intake documentation, psychiatric
history, patient file, medication history, etc. As you progress through each
section, formulate a list of questions that you might ask the patient if he or
she were in your office.
Based on the patient’s case history, consider other people
in his or her life that you would need to speak to or get feedback from (i.e.,
family members, teachers, nursing home aides, etc.).
Consider whether any additional physical exams or diagnostic
testing may be necessary for the patient.
Develop a differential diagnoses for the patient. Refer to the
DSM-5 in this week’s Learning Resources for guidance.
Review the patient’s past and current medications. Refer to
Stahl’s Prescriber’s Guide and consider medications you might select for this
patient.
Review the posttest for the case study.
Week 7 discussion
Discussion: Sleep/Wake Disorders
It is not uncommon to experience a night or two of disrupted
sleep when there is something major going on in your life. However, sleep/wake
disorders are much more than an occasional night of disrupted sleep. A recent
report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that
between 50 and 70 million American have problems with sleep/wake disorders
(CDC, 2015). Although the vast majority of Americans will visit their primary
care provider for treatment of these disorders, many providers will refer
patients for further evaluation. For this Discussion, you consider how you
might assess and treat the individuals based on the provided client factors.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Assess client factors and history to develop personalized
therapy plans for clients with sleep/wake disorders
Analyze factors that influence pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic processes in clients requiring therapy for sleep/wake disorders
Evaluate efficacy of treatment plans for clients presenting
for sleep/wake therapy
Apply knowledge of providing care to adult and geriatric
clients presenting for sleep/wake disorders
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources,
please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course
Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Note: All Stahl
resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using this link. This link
will take you to a log-in page for the Walden Library. Once you log into the
library, the Stahl website will appear.
Stahl, S. M. (2013).
Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical
applications (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
To access the following chapters, click on the Essential
Psychopharmacology, 4th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select the
appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation bar
for each chapter.
Chapter 11, “Disorders of Sleep and Wakefulness and Their
Treatment”
Stahl, S. M. (2014b). The prescriber’s guide (5th ed.). New
York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
To access information on the following medications, click on
The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select the
appropriate medication.
Review the following medications:
For insomnia
alprazolam
amitriptyline
amoxapine
clomipramine
clonazepam
desipramine
diazepam
doxepin
flunitrazepam
flurazepam
hydroxyzine
imipramine
lorazepam
nortriptyline
ramelteon
temazepam
trazodone
triazolam
trimipramine
zaleplon
zolpidem
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and
statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
Davidson, J. (2016).
Pharmacotherapy of post-traumatic stress disorder: Going beyond the guidelines.
British Journal of Psychiatry, 2(6), e16-e18. doi:10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.003707.
Retrieved from http://bjpo.rcpsych.org/content/2/6/e16
To prepare for this Discussion:
Note: By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will have
assigned you to one of the following case studies to review for this
Discussion. To access the following case studies, click on the Case Studies tab
on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate volume and case number.
Case 1: Volume 2, Case #16: The woman who liked late-night
TV
Case 2: Volume 2, Case #11: The figment of a man who looked
upon the lady
Case 3: Volume 1, Case #5: The sleepy woman with anxiety
Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the
insights they provide.
Go to the Stahl Online website and examine the case study
you were assigned.
Take the pretest for the case study.
Review the patient intake documentation, psychiatric
history, patient file, medication history, etc. As you progress through each
section, formulate a list of questions that you might ask the patient if he or
she were in your office.
Based on the patient’s case history, consider other people
in his or her life that you would need to speak to or get feedback from (i.e.,
family members, teachers, nursing home aides, etc.).
Consider whether any additional physical exams or diagnostic
testing may be necessary for the patient.
Develop a differential diagnoses for the patient. Refer to
the DSM-5 in this week’s Learning Resources for guidance.
Review the patient’s past and current medications. Refer to
Stahl’s Prescriber’s Guide and consider medications you might select for this
patient.
Review the posttest for the case study.
Week 9
discussion

Discussion: Presentations of ADHD
Although ADHD is often associated with children, this
disorder is diagnosed in clients across the lifespan. While many individuals
are properly diagnosed and treated during childhood, some individuals who have
ADHD only present with subsyndromal evidence of the disorder. These individuals
are often undiagnosed until they reach adulthood and struggle to cope with
competing demands of running a household, caring for children, and maintaining
employment. For this Discussion, you consider how you might assess and treat
individuals presenting with ADHD.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Assess client factors and history to develop personalized
therapy plans for clients with ADHD
Analyze factors that influence pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic processes in clients requiring therapy for ADHD
Evaluate efficacy of treatment plans
Apply knowledge of providing care to adult and geriatric
clients presenting for antidepressant therapy
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources,
please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course
Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Note: All Stahl
resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using this link. This link
will take you to a log-in page for the Walden Library. Once you log into the
library, the Stahl website will appear.
Clancy, C.M., Change,
S., Slutsky, J., & Fox, S. (2011). Attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder: Effectiveness of treatment in at-risk preschoolers; long-term
effectiveness in all ages; and variability in prevalence, diagnosis, and
treatment. Table B. KQ2: Long-term(>1
year) effectiveness of interventions for ADHD in people 6 years and older.
Stahl, S. M. (2013).
Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications
(4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
To access the following chapters, click on the Essential
Psychopharmacology, 4th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select the
appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation bar
for each chapter.
Chapter 12, “Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and
Its Treatment”
Stahl, S. M., & Mignon, L. (2012). Stahl’s illustrated
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. New York, NY: Cambridge University
Press.
To access the following chapter, click on the Illustrated
Guides tab and then the ADHD tab.
Chapter 4, “ADHD Treatments”
Stahl, S. M. (2014b). The prescriber’s guide (5th ed.). New
York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
To access information on the following medications, click on
The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select the
appropriate medication.
Review the following medications:
For ADHD
armodafinil
amphetamine (d)
amphetamine (d,l)
atomoxetine
bupropion
chlorpromazine
clonidine
guanfacine
haloperidol
lisdexamfetamine
methylphenidate (d)
methylphenidate (d,l)
modafinil
reboxetine
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and
statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
Optional Resources
Hodgkins, P., Shaw, M., McCarthy, S., & Sallee, F. R.
(2012). The pharmacology and clinical outcomes of amphetamines to treat ADHD:
Does composition matter? CNS Drugs, 26(3), 245–268.
doi:10.2165/11599630-000000000-00000
Psychiatric Times.
(2016). A 5-question quiz on ADHD. Retrieved from
http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/adhd/5-question-quiz-adhd?GUID=AA46068B-C6FF-4020-8933-087041A0B140&rememberme=1&ts=22072016
To prepare for this Discussion:
Note: By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will have
assigned you to one of the following case studies to review for this
Discussion. To access the following case studies, click on the Case Studies tab
on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate volume and case number.
Case 1: Volume 1, Case #13: The 8-year-old girl who was
naughty
Case 2: Volume 1, Case #14: The scatter-brained mother whose
daughter has ADHD, like mother, like daughter
Case 3: Volume 2, Case #21: Hindsight is always 20/20, or
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the
insights they provide.
Go to the Stahl Online website and examine the case study
you were assigned.
Take the pretest for the case study.
Review the patient intake documentation, psychiatric
history, patient file, medication history, etc. As you progress through each
section, formulate a list of questions that you might ask the patient if he or
she were in your office.
Based on the patient’s case history, consider other people
in his or her life that you would need to speak to or get feedback from (i.e.,
family members, teachers, nursing home aides, etc.).
Consider whether any additional physical exams or diagnostic
testing may be necessary for the patient.
Develop a differential diagnoses for the patient. Refer to
the DSM-5 in this week’s Learning Resources for guidance.
Review the patient’s past and current medications. Refer to
Stahl’s Prescriber’s Guide and consider medications you might select for this
patient.
Review the posttest for the case study.
Week 10
discussion

Discussion: Influencing Social Change
Individuals with psychiatric mental health disorders are
frequently stigmatized not only by society as a whole, but also by their
friends, family, and sometimes healthcare providers. In your role, however, you
have the opportunity to become a social change agent for these individuals. For
this Discussion, consider how you might make a positive impact for your clients
and advocate for social change within your own community.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Apply strategies to become a social change agent for
psychiatric mental health
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources,
please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course
Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Angermeyer, M. C.,
Matschinger, H., & Schomerus, G. (2013). Attitudes towards psychiatric
treatment and people with mental illness: Changes over two decades. The British
Journal of Psychiatry, 203(2), 146–151. Retrieved from
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/203/2/146.full
Bui, Q. (2012).
Antidepressants for agitation and psychosis in patients with dementia. American
Family Physician, 85(1), 20–22. Retrieved from
http://www.aafp.org/journals/afp.html
Note: Retrieved from from the Walden Library databases.
Dingfelder, S. F.
(2009). Stigma: Alive and well. American Psychological Association, 40(6), 56.
Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/monitor/2009/06/stigma.aspx
Jenkins, J. H.
(2012). The anthropology of psychopharmacology: Commentary on contributions to
the analysis of pharmaceutical self and imaginary. Culture, Medicine and
Psychiatry, 36(1), 78–79. doi:10.1007/s11013-012-9248-0
Note: Retrieved from from the Walden Library databases.
Price, L. H. (2010). Violence in America: Is
psychopharmacology the answer? Brown University Psychopharmacology Update,
21(5), 5. Retrieved from
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1556-7532
Note: Retrieved from from the Walden Library databases.
Optional Resources
Bennett, T. (2015).
Changing the way society understands mental health. National Alliance on Mental
Illness. Retrieved from
http://www.nami.org/Blogs/NAMI-Blog/April-2015/Changing-The-Way-Society-Understands-Mental-Health
Mechanic, D. (2007).
Mental health services then and now. Health Affairs, 26(6), 1548–1550.
Retrieved from
/orders/web.archive.org/web/20170605094514/http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/26/6/1548.full
Rothman, D. J.
(1994). Shiny, happy people: The problem with “cosmetic
psychopharmacology.” New Republic, 210(7), 34–38.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Reflect on how you might influence social change for
psychiatric mental health.

Week 1
discussion

Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience
As a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner, it is
essential for you to have a strong background in foundational neuroscience. In
order to diagnose and treat clients, you must not only understand the
pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders, but also how medications for these
disorders impact the central nervous system. These concepts of foundational
neuroscience can be challenging to understand. Therefore, this Discussion is
designed to encourage you to think through these concepts, develop a rationale
for your thinking, and deepen your understanding by interacting with your
colleagues.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Analyze the agonist-to-antagonist spectrum of action of
psychopharmacologic agents
Compare the actions of g couple proteins to ion gated
channels
Analyze the role of epigenetics in pharmacologic action
Analyze the impact of foundational neuroscience on the
prescription of medications
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources,
please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course
Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Note: All Stahl
resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using this link. This link
will take you to a log-in page for the Walden Library. Once you log into the
library, the Stahl website will appear.
Stahl, S. M. (2013).
Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical
applications (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press *Preface, pp.
ix–x
Note: To access the following chapters, click on the
Essential Psychopharmacology, 4th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select
the appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation
bar for each chapter.
Chapter 1, “Chemical Neurotransmission”
Chapter 2, “Transporters, Receptors, and Enzymes as Targets
of Psychopharmacologic Drug Action”
Chapter 3, “Ion Channels as Targets of Psychopharmacologic
Drug Action”
Document: Midterm
Exam Study Guide (PDF)
Document: Final Exam
Study Guide (PDF)
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2016i). Introduction to
psychopharmacology [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate
length of this media piece is 3 minutes.
Accessible player
Optional Resources
Laureate Education (Producer). (2009). Pathopharmacology:
Disorders of the nervous system: Exploring the human brain [Video file].
Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate
length of this media piece is 15 minutes.
Dr. Myslinski reviews the structure and function of the
human brain. Using human brains, he examines and illustrates the development of
the brain and areas impacted by disorders associated with the brain.
Accessible player
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012). Introduction to
advanced pharmacology [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate
length of this media piece is 8 minutes.
In this media presentation, Dr. Terry Buttaro, associate
professor of practice at Simmons School of Nursing and Health Sciences,
discusses the importance of pharmacology for the advanced practice nurse.
Accessible player
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review this week’s Learning Resources.
Reflect on concepts of foundational neuroscience.
Week 3
discussion

Discussion: The Impact of Ethnicity on Antidepressant
Therapy
Major depressive disorder is one of the most prevalent
disorders you will see in clinical practice. Treatment for this disorder,
however, can vary greatly depending on client factors, such as ethnicity and
culture. As a psychiatric mental health professional, you must understand the
influence of these factors to select appropriate psychopharmacologic
interventions. For this Discussion, consider how you might assess and treat the
individuals in the case studies based on the provided client factors, including
ethnicity and culture.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Assess client factors and history to develop personalized
plans of antidepressant therapy for adult and geriatric clients
Analyze factors that influence pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic processes in adult and geriatric clients requiring
antidepressant therapy
Analyze the impact of ethnicity on antidepressant therapy
Evaluate efficacy of treatment plans
Apply knowledge of providing care to adult and geriatric
clients presenting for antidepressant therapy
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources,
please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course
Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Note: All Stahl
resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using this link. This link
will take you to a log-in page for the Walden Library. Once you log into the
library, the Stahl website will appear.
Stahl, S. M. (2013).
Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical
applications (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Note: To access the following chapters, click on the
Essential Psychopharmacology, 4th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select
the appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation
bar for each chapter.
Chapter 7, “Antidepressants”
Stahl, S. M. (2014b). The prescriber’s guide (5th ed.). New
York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Note: To access the following medications, click on the The
Prescriber’s Guide, 5th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select the
appropriate medication.
Review the following medications:
amitriptyline
bupropion
citalopram
clomipramine
desipramine
desvenlafaxine
doxepin
duloxetine
escitalopram
fluoxetine
fluvoxamine
imipramine
ketamine
mirtazapine
nortriptyline
paroxetine
selegiline
sertraline
trazodone
venlafaxine
vilazodone
vortioxetine
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and
statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
Howland, R. H. (2008a). Sequenced treatment alternatives to
relieve depression (STAR*D). Part 1: Study design. Journal of Psychosocial
Nursing and Mental Health Services, 46(9), 21–24.
doi:10.3928/02793695-20080901-06
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
Howland, R. H. (2008a). Sequenced treatment alternatives to
relieve depression (STAR*D). Part 2: Study outcomes. Journal of Psychosocial
Nursing and Mental Health Services, 46(19), 21–24.
doi:10.3928/02793695-20081001-05
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
Yasuda, S.U., Zhang,
L. & Huang, S.-M. (2008). The role of ethnicity in variability in response
to drugs: Focus on clinical pharmacology studies. Clinical Pharmacology &
Therapeutics, 84(3), 417–423. Retrieved from
/orders/web.archive.org/web/20170809004704//orders/www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/ScienceResearch/…/UCM085502.pdf
To prepare for this Discussion:
Note: By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will have
assigned you to one of the following case studies to review for this
Discussion. To access the following case studies, click on the Case Studies tab
on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate volume and case number.
Case 1: Volume 1, Case #1: The man whose antidepressants
stopped working
Case 2: Volume 1, Case #7: The case of physician do not heal
thyself
Case 3: Volume 1, Case #29: The depressed man who thought he
was out of options
Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the
insights they provide.
Go to the Stahl Online website and examine the case study
you were assigned.
Take the pretest for the case study.
Review the patient intake documentation, psychiatric
history, patient file, medication history, etc. As you progress through each
section, formulate a list of questions that you might ask the patient if he or
she were in your office.
Based on the patient’s case history, consider other people
in his or her life that you would need to speak to or get feedback from (i.e.,
family members, teachers, nursing home aides, etc.).
Consider whether any additional physical exams or diagnostic
testing may be necessary for the patient.
Develop a differential diagnoses for the patient. Refer to the
DSM-5 in this week’s Learning Resources for guidance.
Review the patient’s past and current medications. Refer to
Stahl’s Prescriber’s Guide and consider medications you might select for this
patient.
Review the posttest for the case study.
Week 7 discussion
Discussion: Sleep/Wake Disorders
It is not uncommon to experience a night or two of disrupted
sleep when there is something major going on in your life. However, sleep/wake
disorders are much more than an occasional night of disrupted sleep. A recent
report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that
between 50 and 70 million American have problems with sleep/wake disorders
(CDC, 2015). Although the vast majority of Americans will visit their primary
care provider for treatment of these disorders, many providers will refer
patients for further evaluation. For this Discussion, you consider how you
might assess and treat the individuals based on the provided client factors.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Assess client factors and history to develop personalized
therapy plans for clients with sleep/wake disorders
Analyze factors that influence pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic processes in clients requiring therapy for sleep/wake disorders
Evaluate efficacy of treatment plans for clients presenting
for sleep/wake therapy
Apply knowledge of providing care to adult and geriatric
clients presenting for sleep/wake disorders
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources,
please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course
Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Note: All Stahl
resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using this link. This link
will take you to a log-in page for the Walden Library. Once you log into the
library, the Stahl website will appear.
Stahl, S. M. (2013).
Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical
applications (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
To access the following chapters, click on the Essential
Psychopharmacology, 4th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select the
appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation bar
for each chapter.
Chapter 11, “Disorders of Sleep and Wakefulness and Their
Treatment”
Stahl, S. M. (2014b). The prescriber’s guide (5th ed.). New
York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
To access information on the following medications, click on
The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select the
appropriate medication.
Review the following medications:
For insomnia
alprazolam
amitriptyline
amoxapine
clomipramine
clonazepam
desipramine
diazepam
doxepin
flunitrazepam
flurazepam
hydroxyzine
imipramine
lorazepam
nortriptyline
ramelteon
temazepam
trazodone
triazolam
trimipramine
zaleplon
zolpidem
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and
statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
Davidson, J. (2016).
Pharmacotherapy of post-traumatic stress disorder: Going beyond the guidelines.
British Journal of Psychiatry, 2(6), e16-e18. doi:10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.003707.
Retrieved from http://bjpo.rcpsych.org/content/2/6/e16
To prepare for this Discussion:
Note: By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will have
assigned you to one of the following case studies to review for this
Discussion. To access the following case studies, click on the Case Studies tab
on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate volume and case number.
Case 1: Volume 2, Case #16: The woman who liked late-night
TV
Case 2: Volume 2, Case #11: The figment of a man who looked
upon the lady
Case 3: Volume 1, Case #5: The sleepy woman with anxiety
Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the
insights they provide.
Go to the Stahl Online website and examine the case study
you were assigned.
Take the pretest for the case study.
Review the patient intake documentation, psychiatric
history, patient file, medication history, etc. As you progress through each
section, formulate a list of questions that you might ask the patient if he or
she were in your office.
Based on the patient’s case history, consider other people
in his or her life that you would need to speak to or get feedback from (i.e.,
family members, teachers, nursing home aides, etc.).
Consider whether any additional physical exams or diagnostic
testing may be necessary for the patient.
Develop a differential diagnoses for the patient. Refer to
the DSM-5 in this week’s Learning Resources for guidance.
Review the patient’s past and current medications. Refer to
Stahl’s Prescriber’s Guide and consider medications you might select for this
patient.
Review the posttest for the case study.
Week 9
discussion

Discussion: Presentations of ADHD
Although ADHD is often associated with children, this
disorder is diagnosed in clients across the lifespan. While many individuals
are properly diagnosed and treated during childhood, some individuals who have
ADHD only present with subsyndromal evidence of the disorder. These individuals
are often undiagnosed until they reach adulthood and struggle to cope with
competing demands of running a household, caring for children, and maintaining
employment. For this Discussion, you consider how you might assess and treat
individuals presenting with ADHD.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Assess client factors and history to develop personalized
therapy plans for clients with ADHD
Analyze factors that influence pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic processes in clients requiring therapy for ADHD
Evaluate efficacy of treatment plans
Apply knowledge of providing care to adult and geriatric
clients presenting for antidepressant therapy
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources,
please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course
Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Note: All Stahl
resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using this link. This link
will take you to a log-in page for the Walden Library. Once you log into the
library, the Stahl website will appear.
Clancy, C.M., Change,
S., Slutsky, J., & Fox, S. (2011). Attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder: Effectiveness of treatment in at-risk preschoolers; long-term
effectiveness in all ages; and variability in prevalence, diagnosis, and
treatment. Table B. KQ2: Long-term(>1
year) effectiveness of interventions for ADHD in people 6 years and older.
Stahl, S. M. (2013).
Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications
(4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
To access the following chapters, click on the Essential
Psychopharmacology, 4th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select the
appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation bar
for each chapter.
Chapter 12, “Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and
Its Treatment”
Stahl, S. M., & Mignon, L. (2012). Stahl’s illustrated
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. New York, NY: Cambridge University
Press.
To access the following chapter, click on the Illustrated
Guides tab and then the ADHD tab.
Chapter 4, “ADHD Treatments”
Stahl, S. M. (2014b). The prescriber’s guide (5th ed.). New
York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
To access information on the following medications, click on
The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th ed tab on the Stahl Online website and select the
appropriate medication.
Review the following medications:
For ADHD
armodafinil
amphetamine (d)
amphetamine (d,l)
atomoxetine
bupropion
chlorpromazine
clonidine
guanfacine
haloperidol
lisdexamfetamine
methylphenidate (d)
methylphenidate (d,l)
modafinil
reboxetine
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and
statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
Optional Resources
Hodgkins, P., Shaw, M., McCarthy, S., & Sallee, F. R.
(2012). The pharmacology and clinical outcomes of amphetamines to treat ADHD:
Does composition matter? CNS Drugs, 26(3), 245–268.
doi:10.2165/11599630-000000000-00000
Psychiatric Times.
(2016). A 5-question quiz on ADHD. Retrieved from
http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/adhd/5-question-quiz-adhd?GUID=AA46068B-C6FF-4020-8933-087041A0B140&rememberme=1&ts=22072016
To prepare for this Discussion:
Note: By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will have
assigned you to one of the following case studies to review for this
Discussion. To access the following case studies, click on the Case Studies tab
on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate volume and case number.
Case 1: Volume 1, Case #13: The 8-year-old girl who was
naughty
Case 2: Volume 1, Case #14: The scatter-brained mother whose
daughter has ADHD, like mother, like daughter
Case 3: Volume 2, Case #21: Hindsight is always 20/20, or
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the
insights they provide.
Go to the Stahl Online website and examine the case study
you were assigned.
Take the pretest for the case study.
Review the patient intake documentation, psychiatric
history, patient file, medication history, etc. As you progress through each
section, formulate a list of questions that you might ask the patient if he or
she were in your office.
Based on the patient’s case history, consider other people
in his or her life that you would need to speak to or get feedback from (i.e.,
family members, teachers, nursing home aides, etc.).
Consider whether any additional physical exams or diagnostic
testing may be necessary for the patient.
Develop a differential diagnoses for the patient. Refer to
the DSM-5 in this week’s Learning Resources for guidance.
Review the patient’s past and current medications. Refer to
Stahl’s Prescriber’s Guide and consider medications you might select for this
patient.
Review the posttest for the case study.
Week 10
discussion

Discussion: Influencing Social Change
Individuals with psychiatric mental health disorders are
frequently stigmatized not only by society as a whole, but also by their
friends, family, and sometimes healthcare providers. In your role, however, you
have the opportunity to become a social change agent for these individuals. For
this Discussion, consider how you might make a positive impact for your clients
and advocate for social change within your own community.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Apply strategies to become a social change agent for
psychiatric mental health
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources,
please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course
Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Angermeyer, M. C.,
Matschinger, H., & Schomerus, G. (2013). Attitudes towards psychiatric
treatment and people with mental illness: Changes over two decades. The British
Journal of Psychiatry, 203(2), 146–151. Retrieved from
http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/203/2/146.full
Bui, Q. (2012).
Antidepressants for agitation and psychosis in patients with dementia. American
Family Physician, 85(1), 20–22. Retrieved from
http://www.aafp.org/journals/afp.html
Note: Retrieved from from the Walden Library databases.
Dingfelder, S. F.
(2009). Stigma: Alive and well. American Psychological Association, 40(6), 56.
Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/monitor/2009/06/stigma.aspx
Jenkins, J. H.
(2012). The anthropology of psychopharmacology: Commentary on contributions to
the analysis of pharmaceutical self and imaginary. Culture, Medicine and
Psychiatry, 36(1), 78–79. doi:10.1007/s11013-012-9248-0
Note: Retrieved from from the Walden Library databases.
Price, L. H. (2010). Violence in America: Is
psychopharmacology the answer? Brown University Psychopharmacology Update,
21(5), 5. Retrieved from
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1556-7532
Note: Retrieved from from the Walden Library databases.
Optional Resources
Bennett, T. (2015).
Changing the way society understands mental health. National Alliance on Mental
Illness. Retrieved from
http://www.nami.org/Blogs/NAMI-Blog/April-2015/Changing-The-Way-Society-Understands-Mental-Health
Mechanic, D. (2007).
Mental health services then and now. Health Affairs, 26(6), 1548–1550.
Retrieved from
/orders/web.archive.org/web/20170605094514/http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/26/6/1548.full
Rothman, D. J.
(1994). Shiny, happy people: The problem with “cosmetic
psychopharmacology.” New Republic, 210(7), 34–38.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Reflect on how you might influence social change for
psychiatric mental health.

NURS6640 week 7 assignment latest

NURS6640 week 7 assignment latest

NURS6640 week 7 assignment latest.

Week 7

Assignment 1: Supportive Psychotherapy Versus Interpersonal
Psychotherapy
Although supportive psychotherapy and interpersonal
psychotherapy share some similarities, these therapeutic approaches have many
differences. When assessing clients and selecting therapies, it is important to
recognize these differences and how they may impact your clients. For this
Assignment, as you compare supportive and interpersonal psychotherapy, consider
which therapeutic approach you might use with your clients.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Compare supportive psychotherapy and interpersonal
psychotherapy
Recommend therapeutic approaches for clients presenting for
psychotherapy
To prepare:
Review the media in this week’s Learning Resources.
Reflect on supportive and interpersonal psychotherapeutic
approaches.
The Assignment
In a 1- to 2-page paper, address the following:
Briefly describe how supportive and interpersonal
psychotherapies are similar.
Explain at least three differences between these therapies.
Include how these differences might impact your practice as a mental health
counselor.
Explain which therapeutic approach you might use with
clients and why. Support your approach with evidence-based literature.
Note: The School of Nursing requires that all papers
submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The
Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those
required elements (available at
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates ). All papers
submitted must use this formatting.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading,
do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention
“WK7Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 7 Assignment Rubricto review the Grading
Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 7 Assignment 1link. You will also be able to
“View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer
button. Find the document you saved as “WK7Assgn1+last name+first
initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the
checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.

Week 7
Assignment 1: Supportive Psychotherapy Versus Interpersonal
Psychotherapy
Although supportive psychotherapy and interpersonal
psychotherapy share some similarities, these therapeutic approaches have many
differences. When assessing clients and selecting therapies, it is important to
recognize these differences and how they may impact your clients. For this
Assignment, as you compare supportive and interpersonal psychotherapy, consider
which therapeutic approach you might use with your clients.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Compare supportive psychotherapy and interpersonal
psychotherapy
Recommend therapeutic approaches for clients presenting for
psychotherapy
To prepare:
Review the media in this week’s Learning Resources.
Reflect on supportive and interpersonal psychotherapeutic
approaches.
The Assignment
In a 1- to 2-page paper, address the following:
Briefly describe how supportive and interpersonal
psychotherapies are similar.
Explain at least three differences between these therapies.
Include how these differences might impact your practice as a mental health
counselor.
Explain which therapeutic approach you might use with
clients and why. Support your approach with evidence-based literature.
Note: The School of Nursing requires that all papers
submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The
Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those
required elements (available at
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates ). All papers
submitted must use this formatting.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading,
do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention
“WK7Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 7 Assignment Rubricto review the Grading
Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 7 Assignment 1link. You will also be able to
“View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer
button. Find the document you saved as “WK7Assgn1+last name+first
initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the
checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.

NURS6640 week 6 assignment latest

NURS6640 week 6 assignment latest

NURS6640 week 6 assignment latest.

AssgnWK6_nurs6640.docx (19.23 KB)

Week 6
Assignment 1: Assessing Clients With Addictive Disorders
Addictive disorders can be particularly challenging for
clients. Not only do these disorders typically interfere with a client’s
ability to function in daily life, but they also often manifest as negative and
sometimes criminal behaviors. Sometime clients with addictive disorders also
suffer from other mental health issues, creating even greater struggles for
them to overcome. In your role, you have the opportunity to help clients
address their addictions and improve outcomes for both the clients and their
families. For this Assignment, as you examine the Levy Family video in this
week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat clients
presenting with addiction.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Assess clients presenting with addictive disorders
Analyze therapeutic approaches for treating clients with
addictive disorders
Evaluate outcomes for clients with addictive disorders
To prepare:
Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the
insights they provide.
Review the Levy Family video Episodes 1 through 5.
The Assignment
In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:
After watching Episode 1, describe:
What is Mr. Levy’s perception of the problem?
What is Mrs. Levy’s perception of the problem?
What can be some of the implications of the problem on the
family as a whole?
After watching Episode 2, describe:
What did you think of Mr. Levy’s social worker’s ideas?
What were your thoughts of her supervisor’s questions about
her suggested therapies and his advice to Mr. Levy’s supervisor?
After watching Episode 3, discuss the following:
What were your thoughts about the way Mr. Levy’s therapist
responded to what Mr. Levy had to say?
What were your impressions of how the therapist worked with
Mr. Levy? What did you think about the therapy session as a whole?
Informed by your knowledge of pathophysiology, explain the
physiology of deep breathing (a common technique that we use in helping clients
to manage anxiety). Explain how changing breathing mechanics can alter blood
chemistry.
Describe the therapeutic approach his therapist selected.
Would you use exposure therapy with Mr. Levy? Why or why not? What evidence
exists to support the use of exposure therapy (or the therapeutic approach you
would consider if you disagree with exposure therapy)?
In Episode 4, Mr. Levy tells a very difficult story about
Kurt, his platoon officer.
Discuss how you would have responded to this revelation.
Describe how this information would inform your therapeutic
approach. What would you say/do next?
In Episode 5, Mr. Levy’s therapist is having issues with his
story.
Imagine that you were providing supervision to this
therapist, how would you respond to her concerns?
Support your approach with evidence-based literature.
Note: The School of Nursing requires that all papers
submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The
Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those
required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm). All
papers submitted must use this formatting.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading,
do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention
“WK6Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 6 Assignment Rubricto review the Grading
Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 6 Assignmentlink. You will also be able to
“View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My
Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK6Assgn+last name+first
initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the
checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

NURS6640 week 4 Assignment 1

NURS6640 week 4 Assignment 1

NURS6640 week 4 Assignment 1 latest.

WK4AssgnNURS6640.docx (20.74 KB)

week 4
Assignment 1: Cognitive Behavioral Theory Versus Rational
Emotive Behavioral Theory
While cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and rational
emotive behavioral therapy (REBT) have many similarities, they are distinctly
different therapeutic approaches. When assessing clients and selecting one of
these therapies, you must recognize the importance of not only selecting the
one that is best for the client, but also the approach that most aligns to your
own skill set. For this Assignment, as you examine the similarities and
differences between CBT and REBT, consider which therapeutic approach you might
use with your clients.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Compare cognitive behavioral therapy and rational emotive
behavioral therapy
Recommend cognitive behavioral therapies for clients
To prepare:
Review the media in this week’s Learning Resources.
Reflect on the various forms of cognitive behavioral
therapy.
The Assignment
In a 1- to 2-page paper, address the following:
Briefly describe how cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and
rational emotive behavioral therapy (REBT) are similar.
Explain at least three differences between CBT and REBT.
Include how these differences might impact your practice as a mental health
counselor.
Explain which version of cognitive behavioral therapy you
might use with clients and why. Support your approach with evidence-based
literature.
Note: The School of Nursing requires that all papers
submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The
Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those
required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm). All
papers submitted must use this formatting.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading,
do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention
“WK4Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 4 Assignment 1 Rubricto review the Grading
Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 4 Assignment 1link. You will also be able to
“View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My
Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn1+last name+first
initial.(extension)” and click Open.

NURS6640 week 4 Assignment 1 latest

NURS6640 week 4 Assignment 1 latest

NURS6640 week 4 Assignment 1 latest.

WK4AssgnNURS6640.docx (20.74 KB)

week 4
Assignment 1: Cognitive Behavioral Theory Versus Rational
Emotive Behavioral Theory
While cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and rational
emotive behavioral therapy (REBT) have many similarities, they are distinctly
different therapeutic approaches. When assessing clients and selecting one of
these therapies, you must recognize the importance of not only selecting the
one that is best for the client, but also the approach that most aligns to your
own skill set. For this Assignment, as you examine the similarities and
differences between CBT and REBT, consider which therapeutic approach you might
use with your clients.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Compare cognitive behavioral therapy and rational emotive
behavioral therapy
Recommend cognitive behavioral therapies for clients
To prepare:
Review the media in this week’s Learning Resources.
Reflect on the various forms of cognitive behavioral
therapy.
The Assignment
In a 1- to 2-page paper, address the following:
Briefly describe how cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and
rational emotive behavioral therapy (REBT) are similar.
Explain at least three differences between CBT and REBT.
Include how these differences might impact your practice as a mental health
counselor.
Explain which version of cognitive behavioral therapy you
might use with clients and why. Support your approach with evidence-based
literature.
Note: The School of Nursing requires that all papers
submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The
Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those
required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm). All
papers submitted must use this formatting.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading,
do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention
“WK4Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 4 Assignment 1 Rubricto review the Grading
Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 4 Assignment 1link. You will also be able to
“View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My
Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn1+last name+first
initial.(extension)” and click Open.

NURS6640 week 4 Assignment 1: Cognitive Behavioral Theory Versus Rational Emotive Behavioral Theory latest

NURS6640 week 4 Assignment 1: Cognitive Behavioral Theory Versus Rational Emotive Behavioral Theory latest

NURS6640 week 4 Assignment 1: Cognitive Behavioral Theory

NURS6640 week 4 Assignment 1

WK4AssgnNURS6640.docx (20.74 KB)

week 4 Assignment 1: Cognitive Behavioral Theory Versus Rational
Emotive Behavioral Theory
While cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and rational
emotive behavioral therapy (REBT) have many similarities, they are distinctly
different therapeutic approaches. When assessing clients and selecting one of
these therapies, you must recognize the importance of not only selecting the
one that is best for the client, but also the approach that most aligns to your
own skill set. For this Assignment, as you examine the similarities and
differences between CBT and REBT, consider which therapeutic approach you might
use with your clients.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Compare cognitive behavioral therapy and rational emotive
behavioral therapy
Recommend cognitive behavioral therapies for clients
To prepare:
Review the media in this week’s Learning Resources.
Reflect on the various forms of cognitive behavioral
therapy.
The Assignment
In a 1- to 2-page paper, address the following:
Briefly describe how cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and
rational emotive behavioral therapy (REBT) are similar.
Explain at least three differences between CBT and REBT.
Include how these differences might impact your practice as a mental health
counselor.
Explain which version of cognitive behavioral therapy you
might use with clients and why. Support your approach with evidence-based
literature.
Note: The School of Nursing requires that all papers
submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The
Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those
required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm). All
papers submitted must use this formatting.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading,
do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention
“WK4Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 4 Assignment 1 Rubricto review the Grading
Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 4 Assignment 1link. You will also be able to
“View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My
Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn1+last name+first
initial.(extension)” and click Open.

NURS 6512 WEEK 4 Assign Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions

NURS 6512 WEEK 4 Assign Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions

NURS 6512 WEEK 4 Assign Differential Diagnosis

While cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and rational
emotive behavioral therapy (REBT) have many similarities,

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS: ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT ON NURS 6512 WEEK 4 Assign Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions

Your assignment woes end here!

Differential Diagnosis For Skin Conditions. Properly identifying the cause and type of a patient’s skin condition involves a process of elimination known as differential diagnosis. Using this process, a health professional can take a given set of physical abnormalities, vital signs, health assessment findings, and patient descriptions of symptoms, and incrementally narrow them down until one diagnosis is determined as the most likely cause.In this Lab Assignment, you will examine several visual representations of various skin conditions, describe your observations, and use the techniques of differential diagnosis to determine the most likely condition.

                                                To Prepare
Review the Skin Conditions document provided in this week’s Learning Resources, and select one condition to closely examine for this Lab Assignment.
Consider the abnormal physical characteristics you observe in the graphic you selected. How would you describe the characteristics using clinical terminologies?
Explore different conditions that could be the cause of the skin abnormalities in the graphics you selected.
Consider which of the conditions is most likely to be the correct diagnosis, and why.
Search the Walden library for one evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed article based on the skin condition you chose for this Lab Assignment.
Review the Comprehensive SOAP Exemplar found in this week’s Learning Resources to guide you as you prepare your SOAP note.
Download the SOAP Template found in this week’s Learning Resources, and use this template to complete this Lab Assignment.
The Lab Assignment
Choose one skin condition graphic (identify by number in your Chief Complaint) to document your assignment in the SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) note format rather than the traditional narrative style.
Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Comprehensive SOAP Template in this week’s Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that not all comprehensive SOAP data are included in every patient case.
Use clinical terminologies to explain the physical characteristics featured in the graphic.
Formulate a differential diagnosis of three to five possible conditions for the skin graphic that you chose.
Determine which is most likely to be the correct diagnosis and explain your reasoning using at least three different references, one reference from current evidence-based literature from your search and two different references from this week’s Learning Resources.

NURS 6501 Patho Wk1-2Assign

NURS 6501 Patho Wk1-2Assign

NURS 6501 Patho Wk1-2Assign

A 49-year-old patient with rheumatoid arthritis comes into the clinic with a chief complaint of a fever. Patient’s current medications include atorvastatin 40 mg at night, methotrexate 10 mg po every Friday morning and prednisone 5 mg po qam. He states that he has had a fever up to 101 degrees F for about a week and admits to chills and sweats. He says he has had more fatiguethan usual and reports some chest pain associated with coughing. He admits to having occasional episodes of hemoptysis. He works as a grain inspector at a large farm cooperative. After extensive work-up, the patient was diagnosed with Invasive aspergillosis.

An understanding of cells and cell behavior is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and treatment. But some diseases can be complex in nature, with a variety of factors and circumstances impacting their emergence and severity.
Effective disease analysis often requires an understanding that goes beyond isolated cell behavior. Genes, the environments in which cell processes operate, the impact of patient characteristics, and racial and ethnic variables all can have an important impact.

An understanding of the signals and symptoms of alterations in cellular processes is a critical step in the diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For APRNs, this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans. In this Assignment, you examine a case study and analyze the symptoms presented. You identify a cell, gene, and/or process elements that may be factors in the diagnosis, and you explain the implications to patient health.
To prepare:
By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)
Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis in which you:
· Explain why you think the patient presented the symptoms described.
· Identify the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
· Explain the process of immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems.

Reminder: The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, citations and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at /orders/academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

RUBRIC

Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following: Explain why you think the patient presented the symptoms described. 28 (28%) – 30 (30%)
The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed reasons, with explanation for the symptoms supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The response describes the patient symptoms. The response includes accurate reasons, with explanation for the symptoms supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.
23 (23%) – 24 (24%)
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. The response includes reasons for the symptoms, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.
0 (0%) – 22 (22%)
The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. The response does not include reasons for the symptoms, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate or no evidence/research.
Identify the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease. 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response includes an accurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate analysis of the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease is missing.
 Explain the process of immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems. 28 (28%) – 30 (30%)
The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of the pathophysiological processes that may be associated with the development of the diagnosed condition.
25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The response includes an accurate explanation of the pathophysiological processes that may be associated with the development of the diagnosed condition.
23 (23%) – 24 (24%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the pathophysiological processes that may be associated with the development of the diagnosed condition.
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the pathophysiological processes that may be associated with the development of the diagnosed condition, or the analysis is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100

Readings
McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.
·  Chapter 1: Cellular Biology; Summary Review
·  Chapter 2: Altered Cellular and Tissue Biology: Environmental Agents(pp. 46-61; begin again with Manifestations of Cellular Injury pp. 83-97); Summary Review
· Chapter 3: The Cellular Environment: Fluids and Electrolytes, Acids, and Bases,
· Chapter 4: Genes and Genetic Diseases (stop at Elements of formal genetics); Summary Review
· Chapter 5: Genes, Environment-Lifestyle, and Common Diseases (stop at Genetics of common diseases); Summary Review
· Chapter 7: Innate Immunity: Inflammation and Wound Healing
· Chapter 8: Adaptive Immunity (stop at Generation of clonal diversity); Summary Review
· Chapter 9: Alterations in Immunity and Inflammation (stop at Deficiencies in immunity); Summary Review
· Chapter 10: Infection (stop at Infectious parasites and protozoans); (start at HIV); Summary Review
· Chapter 11: Stress and Disease (stop at Stress, illness & coping)Summary Review
· Chapter 12: Cancer Biology (stop at Resistance to destruction); Summary Review
· Chapter 13: Cancer Epidemiology (stop at Environmental-Lifestyle factors); Summary Review
Note: You previously read these chapters in Week 1 and you are encouraged to review once again for this week.