freelance, Author at Nursing Assignment Owl

Assignment: Using CPOE and CDSS

DNP 805 Topic 3 – Using CPOE and CDSS Details:

For this assignment, select one clinical practice issue that involves a specific medication. Using a Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) system, design a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) that would be embedded in the EHR at your site of practice. Your CDSS must connect with CPOE to include a medication. You must link these two applications within the design.

General Guidelines: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
Use primary sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions: Write a 1,000-1,250 word paper that provides the following:

Specific details of the clinical issue involving a specific medication
The rationale behind your design development.
A description of how this CDSS will be implemented and adopted by fellow clinicians.
An assessment of challenges and proposed solutions which might apply to this scenario (e.g., information loss, communication breakdown).

Portfolio Practice Hours: It may be possible to earn portfolio practice hours for this case report. Enter the following after the references section of your paper: Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-805 I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

DNP 805 Week 4 Assignment: EHR Database and Data Management

Details As a DNP-prepared nurse, you may be called upon to assist in the design of a clinical database for your organization. This assignment requires you to integrate a clinical problem with data technologies to better understand the components as well as how those components can lead to better clinical outcomes.

General Guidelines: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions: For this assignment, write a 1,000-1,250 word paper in which you:

Select a clinically-based patient problem in which using a database management approach provides clear benefit potential.
Identify the data needed to manage this patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR).
Include a brief description of the patient problem which incorporates information needed to manage the specific problem.
Identifies whether the EHR-supplied data is structured or unstructured with an explanation as to why.
Provide a complete description of the structured and unstructured data from the EHR that are needed to organize a hypothetical database.
Provide a complete description of data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database.

Portfolio Practice Hours: It may be possible to earn portfolio practice hours for this case report. Enter the following after the references section of your paper: Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-805 I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

Topic 2 Assignment: Emerging Technologies

Topic 2 Assignment: Emerging Technologies DNP 805 Topic 2 Emerging Technologies

Details:

From the electronic health record (EHR) to nanotechnology to 3-D printers and beyond, there are an increasing number of useful and innovative technologies being used in health care settings that have an important role in linking and organizing care and information. For this assignment, you will create a slide presentation to present to administrators and nurses providing direct patient care.

General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
Use primary sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions: Your presentation must include the following elements:

Identify and provide a brief description of a clinical problem.
Identify a technology that can improve patient outcomes for that clinical problem.
Select a theory to guide the presentation and discuss why this theory is applicable.
Address how the technology you have identified will assist in resolving the clinical problem.
Potential strengths and limitations of the technology selected.

Use PowerPoint to create your slide presentation. Your slide presentation must contain a title slide, 12-15 slides of content, and a References slide. Use evidence to support your claims. A minimum of five references using APA style must be used. Speaker’s notes must be included for each individual slide (add a speaker notes section to demonstrate the verbal speech you would give along with each slide).

Presentation Tips: Text slides are not meant to be read by the speaker, but by the audience. Lettering should generally be limited to four lines and should never be more than seven, including the title.

It is advisable not to use more than eight words per line.
Avoid too much detail and resist the temptation to overload the presentation with information.
Avoid jargon and abbreviations, unless they are clear to all the audience.
Aim at the average person in the audience.
Use plain English.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

DNP 805 Topic 3 – Using CPOE and CDSS

Details:

General Guidelines: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
Use primary sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions: Write a 1,000-1,250 word paper that provides the following:

Specific details of the clinical issue involving a specific medication
The rationale behind your design development.
A description of how this CDSS will be implemented and adopted by fellow clinicians.
An assessment of challenges and proposed solutions which might apply to this scenario (e.g., information loss, communication breakdown).

Case Report Part 1: Sickle cell anaemia

Case Report Part 1: Sickle cell anaemia DNP 810 Week 2 Case Report Part 1

Details: You will be creating a case report in stages over four course topics. Use an example from your own personal practice, experience, or own personal/family; however, simulated cases are not acceptable for practice hours and therefore not acceptable for this assignment. Examples might include a patient with Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy. Huntington’s disease, Down’s syndrome, sickle cell anemia, BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations, or other genetic disorder that you and/or the organization in which you practice may specialize in treating.

General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Include the following:

Guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy).
The role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism).
The role and involvement family plays into the health care decision.

Directions: For this assignment (Part 1 of the Case Report), write a 1,000-1,250 word paper incorporating genetics information learned from assigned readings in Topics 1 and 2. Include the following:

Describe the disease, its prevalence, and its incidence.
Discuss the laboratory testing that is possible.

Portfolio Practice Hours: Practice immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement which reminds you, the student, to enter in a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice immersion assignment is 10. You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network. To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the references section of your paper: Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-810 I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Case Report Part 1: Sickle cell anaemia Case Report: Part 1

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 87.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Discussion of the Guidelines and Reasons Behind the FDA Regulations for Introducing New Pharmaceutical Agents (Policy)	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is not present.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Discussion of the Role That Money and Grants Play In Scientific Advances the Economics of Health Care (Capitalism)	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is not present.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Discussion of the Role and Involvement Family Plays in Health Care Decisions	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is not presented.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is presented but incomplete.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is presented but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is clearly presented and convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is clearly presented, insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Description of the Disease, Its Prevalence, and Its Incidence	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are not described.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are described. Discussion is incomplete.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are described. Discussion is done at a perfunctory level.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are clearly described. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are clearly described. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Discussion of the Possible Laboratory Testing	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is not present.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness	Case Report Part 1: Sickle cell anaemia
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

DNP 810 Week 2 Reading Check for Understanding

Details: Complete the questions listed in the “Problems” section of the textbook on pages 84, 113, 147-149, 174, and 205. Check your answers in the back of the textbook in the “Answers to Problems” appendix.

Week 6 Assignment – Health Issues for the Aging

DNP 810 Week 6 Assignment – Health Issues for the Aging

Week 6 Assignment – Health Issues for the Aging DNP 810

Details: As of 2014 health care expenditures in the United States are near 17% of our gross domestic product (GDP), with a major portion of Medicare funding goes towards chronic illness and care at the last 6 months of life. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has made some initial legislative changes in our health system, but not sufficient to address our growing expenditures and caring for our large aging population. In this assignment, learners will synthesize issues in aging with health policy solutions by writing a paper on one health issue for older individuals addressed in the topic and offering a policy solution. Example of issue: In 2014, over 50% of the costs of institutional long-term care for older persons are paid for with public funds from Medicaid.

General Guidelines: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions: Write a 1,000-1,250 word paper that addresses a health issue for older individuals. Include the following:

Evaluate what the literature suggests as a resolution to your chosen issue.
Discuss any attempts to incorporate the solution into public policy.
Determine the barriers to implementation of the solution.
Analyze the options being discussed for public and/or private funding.
Propose your own recommendation.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

DNP 810 Topic WWeek 6 Assignment – Health Issues for the Aging Health Issues for the Aging

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 87.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
70.0 %Content
15.0 %Evaluation of What the Literature Suggests as a Resolution to the Selected Issue	Evaluation of what the literature suggests as a resolution to the selected issue is not present.	Evaluation of what the literature suggests as a resolution to the selected issue is present but incomplete.	Evaluation of what the literature suggests as a resolution to the selected issue is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Evaluation of what the literature suggests as a resolution to the selected issue is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Evaluation of what the literature suggests as a resolution to the selected issue is clearly present. Discussion is insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
15.0 %Discussion of Any Attempts to Incorporate the Solution Into Public Policy	Discussion of any attempts to incorporate the solution into public policy is not present.	Discussion of any attempts to incorporate the solution into public policy is present but incomplete.	Discussion of any attempts to incorporate the solution into public policy is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of any attempts to incorporate the solution into public policy is clearly present. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of any attempts to incorporate the solution into public policy is clearly present. Discussion is insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
15.0 %Determination of the Barriers to Implementation of the Solution	Determination of the barriers to implementation of the solution is not presented.	Determination of the barriers to implementation of the solution is presented but incomplete.	Determination of the barriers to implementation of the solution is presented but done at a perfunctory level.	Determination of the barriers to implementation of the solution is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly, but some outdated sources are used.	Determination of the barriers to implementation of the solution is clearly presented. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
15.0 %Analysis of the Options Being Discussed for Public and/or Private Funding	Analysis of the options being discussed for public and/or private funding is not presented.	Analysis of the options being discussed for public and/or private funding is presented but incomplete.	Analysis of the options being discussed for public and/or private funding is presented but done at a perfunctory level.	Analysis of the options being discussed for public and/or private funding is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	Analysis of the options being discussed for public and/or private funding is clearly presented. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Recommended Solution	A recommended solution has not presented.	A recommended solution is presented but incomplete.	A recommended solution is presented but done at a perfunctory level.	A recommended solution is clearly presented. Sources used are mostly current and scholarly but some outdated.	A recommended solution is clearly presented. Sources used as support are from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness	*DNP 810 Topic Week 6 Assignment – Health Issues for the Aging*
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

Week 4 Assignment – Genetic Counseling

Week 4 Assignment – Genetic Counseling DNP 810

Details: With the increase in knowledge around genetic issues, it is important that all health care providers are prepared to have thorough genetic-based discussions now with their patients. In this assignment, you will synthesize your knowledge into a client case with a real or potential genetic health-related illness.

General Guidelines: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Use the Surgeon General’s Family History Tool at (http://www.hhs.gov/familyhistory/portrait/index.html) to complete this assignment.

Directions: Write a 1,000-1,250 word paper addressing a client case that might benefit from the process of genetic counseling. Describe the reason for the genetic counseling based on the findings from your completion of the history tool. Discuss the possible reactions the patient may have to your counseling and how to avoid negative reactions. Imagine this assignment as if you are giving this counseling to a patient. Discuss the following:

Health.
Prevention
Screening
Diagnostics
Prognostics
Selection of treatment
Monitoring of treatment effectiveness

Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-810 I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

DNP 810 Topic Week 4 Assignment – Genetic Counseling Genetic Counseling

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 87.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
70.0 %Content
25.0 %Discussion of the Reason for the Genetic Counseling Based on the Findings From Your Completion of the History Tool	Discussion of the reason for the genetic counseling based on the findings from your completion of the history tool is not present.	Discussion of the reason for the genetic counseling based on the findings from your completion of the history tool is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the reason for the genetic counseling based on the findings from your completion of the history tool is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the reason for the genetic counseling based on the findings from your completion of the history tool is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of the reason for the genetic counseling based on the findings from your completion of the history tool is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
25.0 %Discussion of the Possible Reactions the Patient May Have to Your Counseling and How to Avoid Negative Reactions	Discussion of the possible reactions the patient may have to your counseling and how to avoid negative reactions is not present.	Discussion of the possible reactions the patient may have to your counseling and how to avoid negative reactions is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the possible reactions the patient may have to your counseling and how to avoid negative reactions is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the possible reactions the patient may have to your counseling and how to avoid negative reactions is clearly present. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of the possible reactions the patient may have to your counseling and how to avoid negative reactions is clearly present. Discussion is insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Proposal of What You Will Say to the Patient Including the Many Points Offered in the Assignment	Proposal of what you will say to the patient including the many points offered in the assignment is not presented.	Proposal of what you will say to the patient including the many points offered in the assignment is presented but incomplete.	Proposal of what you will say to the patient including the many points offered in the assignment is presented but done at a perfunctory level.	Proposal of what you will say to the patient including the many points offered in the assignment is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	Proposal of what you will say to the patient including the many points offered in the assignment is clearly presented. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness	DNP 810 Topic Week 4 Assignment – Genetic Counseling
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

Case Report Part 2: Chromosomal analysis for gene mutation

Case Report Part 2: Chromosomal analysis for gene mutation DNP 810 Week 3 Case Report Part 2

Details: You will be creating a case report in stages over four course topics. This assignment will add to your previous work in Topic 2. Use an example from your own personal practice, experience, or own personal/family; however, simulated cases are not acceptable for practice hours and therefore not acceptable for this assignment. Examples might include a patient with Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy. Huntington’s disease, Down’s syndrome, sickle cell anemia, BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations, or other genetic disorder that you and/or the organization you practice in may specialize in treating.

General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions: For this assignment (Part 2 of the Case Report), write a 1,000-1,250 word paper incorporating genetics information learned from assigned readings in Topics 1-3. Include the following:

Describe if chromosomal analysis is/was indicated.
Detail the causes of the disorder.
Describe the disorder in terms of its origin as either a single gene inheritance, or as a complex inheritance and considerations for practice and patient education.
Analyze the gene mutation of the disease, as well as whether it is acquired or inherited, and how the mutation occurs.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network. To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the references section of your paper:

Case Report: Part 2

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 87.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Description of Whether or Not Chromosomal Analysis Is/Was Indicated	Discussion of whether or not chromosomal analysis is/was indicated is not present.	Discussion of whether or not chromosomal analysis is/was indicated is present but incomplete.	Discussion of whether or not chromosomal analysis is/was indicated is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of whether or not chromosomal analysis is/was indicated is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of whether or not chromosomal analysis is/was indicated is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Discussion of the Causes of the Disorder	Discussion of the causes of the disorder is not present.	Discussion of the causes of the disorder is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the causes of the disorder is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the causes of the disorder is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of the causes of the disorder is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Description of the Disorder in Terms of Its Origin as Either a Single Gene Inheritance, or as a Complex Inheritance and Considerations for Practice and Patient Education	Description of the disorder in terms of its origin as either a single gene inheritance, or as a complex inheritance and considerations for practice and patient education is not presented.	Description of the disorder in terms of its origin as either a single gene inheritance, or as a complex inheritance and considerations for practice and patient education is presented but incomplete.	Description of the disorder in terms of its origin as either a single gene inheritance, or as a complex inheritance and considerations for practice and patient education is presented but done at a perfunctory level.	Description of the disorder in terms of its origin as either a single gene inheritance, or as a complex inheritance and considerations for practice and patient education is clearly presented and convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	Description of the disorder in terms of its origin as either a single gene inheritance, or as a complex inheritance and considerations for practice and patient education is clearly presented, insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Analysis of the Gene Mutation of the Disease, as Well as Whether It Is Acquired or Inherited, and How the Mutation Occurs	Analysis of the gene mutation of the disease, as well as whether it is acquired or inherited, and how the mutation occurs is not presented.	Analysis of the gene mutation of the disease, as well as whether it is acquired or inherited, and how the mutation occurs is presented. Discussion is incomplete.	Analysis of the gene mutation of the disease, as well as whether it is acquired or inherited, and how the mutation occurs is presented. Discussion is done at a perfunctory level.	Analysis of the gene mutation of the disease, as well as whether it is acquired or inherited, and how the mutation occurs is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	Analysis of the gene mutation of the disease, as well as whether it is acquired or inherited, and how the mutation occurs is clearly presented. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness	DNP 810 Week 3 Case Report Part 2: Chromosomal analysis for gene mutation
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format	DNP 810 Week 3 Case Report Part 2
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

DNP 810 Week 3 – Family History

Details: Taking a family history is an important step in determining current and future health needs and education. There are many tools available to complete a comprehensive health history. The Surgeon General’s Family Health History tool is part of the larger Family Health History Initiative that encourages people to talk about and write down health issues that seem to run in the family, bringing a larger focus on this important issue. This assignment allows the learner to use the tool and become familiar with this initiative.

General Guidelines: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Use the Surgeon General’s Family History Tool at (http://www.hhs.gov/familyhistory/portrait/index.html) to complete this assignment.

Directions: Use the Surgeon General’s Family History Tool (http://www.hhs.gov/familyhistory/portrait/index.html) to document your own family history. Designate a proband for the pedigree with a disease or condition of interest.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Write a 750-1,000 word summary of your findings. Include the following information:

Discussion of the heredity patterns discovered.
Evaluate the risk of transmission to other/new family members.
Propose the feasibility of using this tool in your own practice.

Family History

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 87.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
70.0 %Content
25.0 %Discussion of the Heredity Patterns Discovered	Discussion of the heredity patterns discovered is not present.	Discussion of the heredity patterns discovered is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the heredity patterns discovered is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the heredity patterns discovered is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of the heredity patterns discovered is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
25.0 %Evaluation of the Risk of Transmission to Other/New Family Members	Evaluation of the risk of transmission to other/new family members is not present.	Evaluation of the risk of transmission to other/new family members is present but incomplete.	Evaluation of the risk of transmission to other/new family members is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Evaluation of the risk of transmission to other/new family members is clearly present. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Evaluation of the risk of transmission to other/new family members is clearly present. Discussion is insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Proposal of the Feasibility of Using This Tool in Your Own Practice	Proposal of the feasibility of using this tool in your own practice is not presented.	Proposal of the feasibility of using this tool in your own practice is presented but incomplete.	Proposal of the feasibility of using this tool in your own practice is presented but done at a perfunctory level.	Proposal of the feasibility of using this tool in your own practice is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	Proposal of the feasibility of using this tool in your own practice is clearly presented. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness	DNP 810 Week 3 – Family History
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

Case Report Part 1: Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy

Case Report Part 1: Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy DNP 810 Week 2 Case Report Part 1

General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Include the following:

Guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy).
The role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism).
The role and involvement family plays into the health care decision.

Describe the disease, its prevalence, and its incidence.
Discuss the laboratory testing that is possible.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Case Report Part 1: Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy

Case Report: Part 1

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 87.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Discussion of the Guidelines and Reasons Behind the FDA Regulations for Introducing New Pharmaceutical Agents (Policy)	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is not present.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Discussion of the Role That Money and Grants Play In Scientific Advances the Economics of Health Care (Capitalism)	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is not present.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Discussion of the Role and Involvement Family Plays in Health Care Decisions	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is not presented.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is presented but incomplete.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is presented but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is clearly presented and convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is clearly presented, insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Description of the Disease, Its Prevalence, and Its Incidence	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are not described.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are described. Discussion is incomplete.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are described. Discussion is done at a perfunctory level.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are clearly described. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are clearly described. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Discussion of the Possible Laboratory Testing	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is not present.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness	Case Report Part 1: Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

DNP 810 Week 2 Reading Check for Understanding

Case Report Part 1: Huntington’s disease

Case Report Part 1: Huntington’s disease DNP 810 Week 2 Case Report Part 1

General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Include the following:

Guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy).
The role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism).
The role and involvement family plays into the health care decision.

Describe the disease, its prevalence, and its incidence.
Discuss the laboratory testing that is possible.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Case Report Part 1: Huntington’s disease

Case Report: Part 1

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 87.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Discussion of the Guidelines and Reasons Behind the FDA Regulations for Introducing New Pharmaceutical Agents (Policy)	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is not present.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Discussion of the Role That Money and Grants Play In Scientific Advances the Economics of Health Care (Capitalism)	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is not present.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Discussion of the Role and Involvement Family Plays in Health Care Decisions	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is not presented.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is presented but incomplete.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is presented but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is clearly presented and convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is clearly presented, insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Description of the Disease, Its Prevalence, and Its Incidence	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are not described.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are described. Discussion is incomplete.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are described. Discussion is done at a perfunctory level.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are clearly described. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are clearly described. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Discussion of the Possible Laboratory Testing	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is not present.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness	Case Report Part 1: Huntington’s disease
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

DNP 810 Week 2 Reading Check for Understanding

Case Report Part 1: Down’s syndrome

Case Report Part 1: Down’s syndrome DNP 810 Week 2 Case Report Part 1

General Requirements: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Include the following:

Guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy).
The role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism).
The role and involvement family plays into the health care decision.

Describe the disease, its prevalence, and its incidence.
Discuss the laboratory testing that is possible.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Case Report Part 1: Down’s syndrome

Case Report: Part 1

	1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%	2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00%	3 Satisfactory 79.00%	4 Good 87.00%	5 Excellent 100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Discussion of the Guidelines and Reasons Behind the FDA Regulations for Introducing New Pharmaceutical Agents (Policy)	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is not present.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Discussion of the Role That Money and Grants Play In Scientific Advances the Economics of Health Care (Capitalism)	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is not present.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Discussion of the Role and Involvement Family Plays in Health Care Decisions	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is not presented.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is presented but incomplete.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is presented but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is clearly presented and convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is clearly presented, insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Description of the Disease, Its Prevalence, and Its Incidence	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are not described.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are described. Discussion is incomplete.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are described. Discussion is done at a perfunctory level.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are clearly described. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are clearly described. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Discussion of the Possible Laboratory Testing	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is not present.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is present but incomplete.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is present but done at a perfunctory level.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used.	Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness	Case Report Part 1: Down’s syndrome
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

Nursing Assignment Owl

All posts by : freelance

Assignment: Using CPOE and CDSS

Assignment: Using CPOE and CDSS

Topic 2 Assignment: Emerging Technologies

Topic 2 Assignment: Emerging Technologies

Case Report Part 1: Sickle cell anaemia

Case Report Part 1: Sickle cell anaemia

DNP 810 Week 2 Reading Check for Understanding

Week 6 Assignment – Health Issues for the Aging

DNP 810 Week 6 Assignment – Health Issues for the Aging

Week 4 Assignment – Genetic Counseling

Week 4 Assignment – Genetic Counseling

Case Report Part 2: Chromosomal analysis for gene mutation

Case Report Part 2: Chromosomal analysis for gene mutation

DNP 810 Week 3 – Family History

DNP 810 Week 3 – Family History

Case Report Part 1: Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy

Case Report Part 1: Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy

DNP 810 Week 2 Reading Check for Understanding

Case Report Part 1: Huntington’s disease

Case Report Part 1: Huntington’s disease

DNP 810 Week 2 Reading Check for Understanding

Case Report Part 1: Down’s syndrome

Case Report Part 1: Down’s syndrome

DNP 810 Week 2 Reading Check for Understanding

You're in safe hands

Don't miss out on this exclusive offer

We have all your Nursing Assignment Needs Covered.