NURS 7324 Healthcare Economics and Policy

NURS 7324 Healthcare Economics and Policy Assignments

NURS 7324 Healthcare Economics and Policy Assignments

COURSE DESCRIPTION

This course prepares the student to lead improvements in health care through an understanding of macroeconomic principles in the health care market.  Students will be given the opportunity to apply theoretical and empirical economic analysis to business and public policy issues in health care.

CREDIT AND TIME ALLOCATION

Credit Hour Allocation: 3 Semester Credit Hours Clock Hour Allocation: 3 Clock Hours Class (45 hours class)

PREREQUISITES

Graduate Standing

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

PROGRAM OUTCOMES

Upon completion of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Program students will:

  1. Integrate nursing science, ethics, biophysical, psychosocial, analytical, and organizational sources to provide the highest level of specialty nursing practices.
  2. Develop, implement, and evaluate healthcare practices in healthcare systems that ensure quality improvement and patient safety.
  3. Use analytic methods and evidence based practices to improve practice outcomes and the practice environment.
  4. Implement and evaluate ethical healthcare information systems and patient care technology to improve the quality of patient health outcomes and care systems.
  5. Advocate for healthcare practices that advance social justice, equity, and ethical policies within all healthcare arenas.
  6. Employ interprofessional collaborative teams to improve patient and population health outcomes and healthcare delivery systems.
  7. Lead the integration and institutionalization of (evidence based) clinical prevention and population based health guidelines.
  8. Use clinical judgment, systems thinking, accountability, and specialized knowledge to design, deliver, and evaluate evidence based, culturally proficient care to improve patient, population, and health systems outcomes.

COURSE OUTCOMES

  1. Describe the role of health economics in healthcare and healthcare policy at the macroeconomic level
  2. Synthesize relevant economic concepts and models in the health care sector.
  3. Critically analyze the role of payers from an economic perspective
  4. Describe the relationship between insurance and health.
  5. Critically analyze perspectives on the role of government in health care.
  6. Evaluate the role of economic factors in the development of policy concerning health and health care.

CLINICAL OUTCOMES

N/A

GRADING SCALE FOR GRADUATE COURSES

A = 4 points (90-100) B = 3 points (80-89) C = 2 points (75-79) D = 1 point (66-74) F = 0 points (65 or below)

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION / GRADES

Grade Percentages:

ACTIVITY Details PERCENT OF TOTAL GRADE
Class Attendance First two days face to face   5
Discussion Boards 5 discussions / 5 points each 25
Quizzes 3 quizzes / 10 points each 30
Article Reviews 3 articles / 10 points each 30
Homework 2 assignments 10

Grading Criteria: 1. Class Attendance and Participation: Students are expected to attend both weekend classes at the beginning of the semester prepared to participate in class discussions, share insight from the readings, and  demonstrate integration of course content with their professional practice  experiences.

  1. Consistently engaged online participation is paramount to gaining the full benefit of the content and it’s application in this course. It is an expectation that students will follow specific instructions for each online discussion. Students are expected to contribute to online discussion in a scholarly manner, using literature to support statements. All supporting literature must be referenced, using APA standards. Students will be expected to share insights from the readings integrated with their practice experience, challenging the readings or their practice where there seems to be incongruence. It is an expectation that postings will be grammatically correct with minimal typographical errors.

Grading Criteria for Discussion Board Forums: Postings reflect professional level writing skills and employ professional courtesy. • Postings are accurate, substantive, and demonstrate original thought. • Responses to peers deepen and expand the discussion – simply agreeing or disagreeing with a posting does not constitute a response. • Postings are supported by relevant literature when appropriate and cited in APA format. • Postings conform to the stated directions including the timeframe for initial and follow-up postings and the frequency of postings. • Late postings will not be accepted.

  1. Application Assignment specifics will be submitted under Course Materials and linked from the Assignment link in Canvas. They are used as the basis for building competency with economic models and related policy analysis. Submissions that are less than or equal to one day late will be given a 50% beginning deduction prior to grading criteria being applied. Submissions more than one day late will not be accepted.
  2.  Criteria specifics for Article Reviews will be posted under Course Materials and linked from the Assignment Link in Canvas.Late submissions will receive 10 points deduction for each 24 hour period late.
  3. Responses to Online Presentations will be organized according the that response rubric and posted on the Discussion Board by the due date.

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS

  1. If written assignments are made in a course they are required.
  2. Students are expected to submit written work on the scheduled date and time.
  3. The student must notify the course coordinator prior to the scheduled due date and time if they are unable to submit the written work as scheduled. Failure to make this notification in advance will result in a “zero” for that written work.
  4. If the excuse is accepted as reasonable and necessary, arrangements will be made for an alternative due date and time.
  5. Each student is responsible for making sure that he or she has completed the written work prior to submission.
  6. Late work will be accepted with consequences as outlined per course syllabi.

APA GUIDELINES

The APA Publication Manual 6th edition is required for use in all nursing school programs.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Who We Are 

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NURS 7324 Healthcare Economics and Policy

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

  • Guarantee NURS 7324 Healthcare Economics and Policy

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions
  • NURS 7324 Healthcare Economics and Policy

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, affordable, plagiarism-free paper

NURS 7322 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Advocacy Assignments

NURS 7322 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Advocacy Assignments

NURS 7322 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Advocacy Assignments

COURSE DESCRIPTION

This course prepares the nurse leader to advance the agenda of the rapidly changing care environment by examination of health policy research and analysis. Students will focus on policy process and develop and implement policy agendas. They will participate in collective decision-making, identifying roles and key stakeholders. The course will address how to identify gaps in policy knowledge and provide opportunity for nurse leaders to engage in processes that influence policy decisions at the institutional, local, state, regional, national and/ or international levels. The course will prepare the nurse leader to analyze the policy process and engage in politically competent care.

CREDIT AND TIME ALLOCATION

Credit Hour Allocation: 3 Semester Credit Hours Clock Hour Allocation: 3 Clock Hours Class (45 hours class)

PREREQUISITES

NURS 5339 Leadership for Quality, Safety, and Health Policy or equivalent

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

PROGRAM OUTCOMES

Upon completion of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Program students will:

  1. Integrate nursing science, ethics, biophysical, psychosocial, analytical, and organizational sources to provide the highest level of specialty nursing practices.
  2. Develop, implement, and evaluate healthcare practices in healthcare systems that ensure quality improvement and patient safety.
  3. Use analytic methods and evidence based practices to improve practice outcomes and the practice environment.
  4. Implement and evaluate ethical healthcare information systems and patient care technology to improve the quality of patient health outcomes and care systems.
  5. Advocate for healthcare practices that advance social justice, equity, and ethical policies within all healthcare arenas.
  6. Employ interprofessional collaborative teams to improve patient and population health outcomes and healthcare delivery systems.
  7. Lead the integration and institutionalization of (evidence based) clinical prevention and population based health guidelines.
  8. Use clinical judgment, systems thinking, accountability, and specialized knowledge to design, deliver, and evaluate evidence based, culturally proficient care to improve patient, population, and health systems outcomes.

COURSE OUTCOMES

  1. Analyze the history, structure, and process of health policy in the United States.
  2. Critically analyze health policy proposals, health policies, and related issues from the perspective of consumers, nursing, and other stakeholders in policy and public forums.
  3. Demonstrate leadership in the development and implementation of institutional, local, state, federal, and/or international policy.
  4. Influence policy makers through active participation on committees, boards, and task forces at institutional, local, state, regional, national and/or international levels to improve health care delivery and outcomes.
  5. Educate others, including policy makers at all levels, regarding nursing, health policy and patient care outcomes.
  6. Participate in health services research and policy and economic analyses.
  7. Advocate for social justice, equity, and ethical policies within all healthcare arenas.

CLINICAL OUTCOMES

N/A

GRADING SCALE FOR GRADUATE COURSES

A = 4 points (90-100) B = 3 points (80-89) C = 2 points (75-79) D = 1 point (66-74) F = 0 points (65 or below)

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION / GRADES

Assignment 1 – Weekly required activity/class participation – 20% of grade Each week read and complete required learning activities per rubric Assignment 2 – Stakeholder Analysis for Selected Health Policy Topic – 20% of grade Stakeholder Analysis [900 – 1000 words, exclusive of title page and references, double-spaced] will be graded on the following criteria:

  •   Diversity of stakeholders selected [4 total: 2 proponents and 2  opponents]
  •   Level of analysis
  •   Organization and conciseness of writing

Assignment 3 –Legislative Interview Reaction Paper

20% of grade

Student is required to complete the following steps:

1.  Arrange to meet with a Federal, State, or Community legislator/city council member whose scope of authority includes the health policy topic you selected.   Conduct an interview of the person seeking his or her opinion on the health policy topic.  You will need to familiarize yourself with a specific current issue that you would like to seek the legislator’s opinions or view. Hint: the newspaper, television, blogs, professional organization websites frequently talks about some health related issues [be mindful of how stakeholders’ perceptions may differ regarding the same set of facts]

2. Write a reaction paper related to the interview, inclusive of a description of the health issue and how the doctorally-prepared nurse could inform/shape health policy related to that issue.   Include your observations and reaction to the experience.
 
3.  The paper (1000 – 1500) words, exclusive of references, double-spaced) will be graded on the following criteria:
  •      Describe the health issues and the person or persons selected to    interview stating why selected.
  •      Include your reaction to the meeting and exchange with the policy person
  •      Include your and the person(s) interacted with responses and interpretations related to the health policy that was discussed
  •      Describe the doctorally-prepared nurse’s role and potential actions related to this health policy issue and why it is important
  •      What did you learn through this experience and how will it be used in the future?
  • What has been the most informative aspects of becoming involved in this process?
  • What worked and what did not work?
  • What concession or what negotiation or compromised occurred or was observed to the policy moving forward?
  • Did this strengthen or weaken the proposed outcome and why?
  • How will you use this in the future?

Assignment 4: Development of Advocacy Strategy for Selected Health Issue, Inclusive of Politically-Related Economic Concerns – 20% of grade.

Strategy will be graded on the following criteria [Advocacy Imperatives will be divided into four (4) power points including notes]
  •     Application of Shilton Model of Advocacy (2010)[will review in class]
  •     Scope and depth of research supporting imperative 1
  •     Clarity of relevance, inclusive of economic analysis supporting    imperative 2
  •     Clarity and cohesiveness of imperative 3
  •     Scope and creativity of imperatives 4 and 5
  •     Organization and conciseness of writing

Assignment 5 –Presentation of Advocacy Strategy for Selected Health Issue, Inclusive of Politically-Related Economic Concerns– 20% of grade

Strategy will be graded on the following criteria [(2) 15 minute power point presentations]:
  •    Cohesiveness of strategy
  •    Effective use of graphics
  •    Style of presentation

Weighting of assignments: Assignment 1 – 20% of grade Assignment 2 – 20% of grade Assignment 3 – 20% of grade Assignment 4 – 20% of grade Assignment 5 – 20% of grade

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS

  1. If written assignments are made in a course they are required.
  2. Students are expected to submit written work on the scheduled date and time.
  3. The student must notify the course coordinator prior to the scheduled due date and time if they are unable to submit the written work as scheduled. Failure to make this notification in advance will result in a “zero” for that written work.
  4. If the excuse is accepted as reasonable and necessary, arrangements will be made for an alternative due date and time.
  5. Each student is responsible for making sure that he or she has completed the written work prior to submission.
  6. Late work will be accepted with consequences as outlined per course syllabi. NURS 7322 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Advocacy Assignments

APA GUIDELINES

The APA Publication Manual 6th edition is required for use in all nursing school programs.

REQUIRED TEXT / REFERENCE

[ORDER BOOK FROM VENDOR OF YOUR CHOICE; AVAILABLE IN PAPERBACK AND ELECTRONIC FORMAT]

Aisle C Productions & Our Times Project (2012). Escape Fire: The Fight to Rescue American Healthcare (documentary). [110 minutes]. [Rent online ($3.99) from student’s vendor of choice. Please note, vendor rental cost may vary;  may also be purchased]

Dunn, W.N. (2018). Public policy analysis. An integrated approach (6th Ed).  London: Routledge.  Print ISBN: 9781138743847, 1138743844 or eText ISBN 9781351721684, 1351721682  [rent or buy from student’s vendor of choice]

CONTENT OUTLINE

  1. Health Policy and Advocacy a.  Introduction to Health Policy (setting the stage) b.  Health Policy Advocacy and the doctorally-prepared nurse c.  Ethical and global health policy issues 2.  Methodology of Policy Analysis (focus on selected health policy topic) a.  The Process of Policy Analysis b.  Policy Analysis in the Policy-Making Process c.  Structuring Policy Problems d.  Prescribing Preferred Policies e.  Evaluating Policy Performance f.   Developing Policy Arguments g.  Communicating Policy Analysis 3.  Developing an Effective Health Policy Advocacy Strategy a.  Using an Advocacy Model to Guide Strategy b.  Professional Leadership and Political Competency/Advocacy

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Who We Are 

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NURS 7322 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Advocacy Assignments

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. NURS 7322 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Advocacy Assignments

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

  • Guarantee NURS 7322 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Advocacy Assignments

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, affordable, plagiarism-free paper

NURS6531 Full Course Work

NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 1 discussion: Competencies for Nurse Practitioners

The Consensus Model for APRN Regulation has brought about changes in the competencies for nurse practitioners. There are Core Competencies for all nurse practitioner populations and include both MSN and DNP degrees. Review your Learning Resources Page to examine the Core Competencies. Family/Across the Lifespan competencies Adult-Gerontology NP competencies The major categories of family/across the lifespan competencies include the following: Scientific Foundation; Leadership; Quality; Practice Inquiry; Technology and Information Literacy; Policy; Health Delivery System; Ethics; and Independent Practice. In this Discussion, you explore the nine competencies, and their application to the clinical setting. The adult-gerontology NP competencies are different and students in that specialty should become familiar with them.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

To prepare:

Review this week’s media presentation with Dr. Terry Buttaro, as well as the “Nurse Practitioner Self-Appraisal Guide” in the Learning Resources. Review the Consensus Model for APRN Regulation and the National Organization for Nurse Practitioner Faculties Core Competencies and population foci competencies. Consider the following nine competencies (Note: By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will assign you to post on one of these nine competencies): Scientific Foundation Leadership Quality Practice Inquiry Technology and Information Literacy Policy Health Delivery System Ethics Independent Practice Reflect on the category that was assigned to you by the Course Instructor. Think about how you would implement this competency in a clinical setting. Consider evidence-based clinical practice. Post on or before Day 3 a brief description of the competency that was assigned to you. With your competency description in mind, explain how you would implement it in a clinical setting. Support your rationale with evidence from current research.

Week 2 Discussion: Diagnosing Skin, Eye, Ear, and Throat Disorders

When entering examination rooms, advanced practice nurses often immediately begin assessing patients by looking for external abnormalities such as skin irritations or cloudy eyes. By making these simple observations, they can determine how to proceed with their patient evaluations. During the patient evaluation, advanced practice nurses will use initial observations to guide them in acquiring the necessary medical history, performing additional assessments, and ordering the appropriate diagnostics. The information obtained during this evaluation process will help in the development of a differential diagnosis. Once a diagnosis is made, the advanced practice nurse can consider potential treatment options and work with the patient to develop a plan of care. For this Discussion, consider the following four case studies of patients presenting with skin, eye, ear, and throat disorders Case Study 1: A 46-year-old male presents to the office complaining of a pruritic skin rash that has been present for a few weeks. He initially noted the rash on his chest, but it then spread to his back and arms. He notes that it does not seem to be on his legs. He recently came home from a trip to Florida, but denies fever, chills, new soaps or detergents, other travel, or known insect bites. He takes occasional ibuprofen for knee pain, but denies taking other medications or having other health problems. He has no known drug allergies. The physical examination reveals a male with a deep tan and notable scattered 1–1.5-centimeter, flat, circular, light-colored patches on his chest, back, and upper extremities.

Case Study 2:

An 86-year-old widowed female is brought to the office by her daughter-in-law. The patient complains of constant tearing and an itchy, burning sensation in both eyes. The patient states this is not a new problem, but it has worsened in the past week and is affecting her vision. The patient complains that her eyes are dry. She thinks the problem must be caused by one of her medications. Her patient medical history is positive for hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. She has an allergy to erythromycin that causes rash and elevated liver enzymes. Medications currently prescribed include Furosemide 40 milligrams po twice a day, diltiazem 240 milligrams po daily, lisinopril 20 milligrams po daily, and warfarin 3 milligrams po daily. The physical examination reveals a frail older female with some facial dryness and slight scaling. Her visual acuity is 20/60 OU, 20/40 OD, 20/60 OS. The eyelids are erythematous and edematous with yellow crusting around the lashes. Sclera are injected, conjunctiva are pale, and pupils are equal and reactive to light and accommodation.

Case Study 3:

A middle-aged male presents to the office complaining of a two-day history of a left earache. The onset was gradual, but has steadily been increasing. It has been constantly aching since last night, and his hearing seems diminished to him. Today he thinks the left side of his face may even be swollen. He denies upper respiratory infection, known fever, or chills. His patient medical history is positive for Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The patient has a known allergy to Amoxicillin that results in pruritus. Medications currently prescribed include Metformin 1,000 milligrams po twice a day, lisinopril 20 milligrams po daily, Aspirin 81 milligrams po daily, and simvastatin 40 milligrams po daily. The physical exam reveals a middle aged male at a weight of 160 pounds, height of 5’8”, temperature of 98.8 degrees Fahrenheit, heart rate of 88, respiratory rate of 18, and blood pressure of 138/76. Further examination reveals the following: Face: Faint asymmetry with left periauricular area slightly edematous Eyes: sclera clear, conj wnl L ear: + tenderness L pinna, + edema, erythema, exudates left external auditory canal, TM not visible R ear: no tenderness, R external auditory canal clear without edema, erythema, exudates + tenderness L preauricular node, otherwise no lymphadenopathy Cardiac: S1 S2 regular. No S3 S4 or murmur. Lungs: CTA w/o rales, wheezes, or rhonchi.

Case Study 4:

A middle-aged female presents to the office complaining of strep throat. She states she suddenly developed a sore throat yesterday afternoon, and it has gotten worse since then. During the night she felt like she was chilled and feverish. She denies known recent contact with anyone else who had strep throat, but states she has had strep before and it feels like she has strep now. She takes no medications, but is allergic to penicillin. The physical examination reveals a slender female lying on the examination table. She has a temperature of 101 degrees Fahrenheit, heart rate of 112, respiratory rate of 22, and blood pressure of 96/64. The head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat evaluation is positive for bilateral tonsillar swelling without exudates. Her neck is supple with bilateral, tender, enlarged anterior cervical nodes.

To prepare:

Review this week’s media presentations and Parts 5–8 of the Buttaro et al. text. Select one of the four case studies provided. Reflect on the provided patient information including history and physical exams. Think about a differential diagnosis. Consider the role the patient history and physical exam played in your diagnosis. Reflect on potential treatment options based on your diagnosis. Post on or before Day 3 an explanation of the differential diagnosis for the patient in the case study that you selected. Describe the role the patient history and physical exam played in the diagnosis. Then, suggest potential treatment options based on your patient diagnosis. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 3 Discussion: Hypertension

In clinical settings, advanced practice nurses frequently use various strategies to treat and manage patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular disorders. These strategies often include pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies, natural remedies, and/or changes in patient behavior. For hypertension patients, behavioral changes including increased exercise, healthier diet, and smoking cessation have proven to be particularly beneficial. However, it is important to recognize that treatment and management plans centered around changes in behavior often require greater patient commitment. This creates the need for patient-provider collaboration, as well as appropriate patient education. When patients are actively involved in their own care and better understand implications of their disorders, they are more likely to adhere to treatment plans. To prepare: Review Part 11 of the Buttaro et al. text and the National Heart Lung Blood Institute article in this week’s Learning Resources. Reflect on your Practicum Experiences and observations. Select a case from these experiences that involves a patient who presented with a hypertension problem. When referring to your patient, make sure to use a pseudonym or other false form of identification. This is to ensure the privacy and protection of the patient. Think about the patient’s history including drug treatments and behavioral factors such as diet, exercise, smoking, etc. Review the National Heart Lung Blood Institute article in the Learning Resources. Reflect on health promotion strategies for the patient. Consider ways to reinforce hypertension management. Post on or before Day 3 a description of a patient who presented with a hypertension problem during your Practicum Experience. Explain the patient’s history including drug treatments and behavioral factors. Then, suggest two health promotion strategies for the patient. Include suggestions for reinforcing hypertension management. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 4 Discussion

DQ1 – Blood Clots Blood clots form in various locations of the body and are not unique to any specific age group or gender. While there are certain risk factors that may make a patient more likely to develop blood clots, essentially any patient is a potential candidate. Unfortunately, blood clots often go unrecognized until something happens. Even if the patient identifies a problem and seeks medical care, blood clots are frequently misdiagnosed resulting in serious medical complications and sometimes death. Why does this happen? How can you, as the advanced practice nurse, protect your patients from misdiagnosis? Consider the following case studies: Case Study 1: A 44-year-old African American male had a partial colectomy to have a cancerous tumor removed. The patient did really well after surgery and was discharged from post-op recovery to the surgical unit at a medical center. Approximately one hour after surgery, the patient complained of gas pains and shortness of breath. The patient continued to complain of gas pains after administration of morphine sulfate. Providers failed to diagnose a pulmonary embolism that resulted in the loss of the patient’s life. Case Study 2: A 50-year-old white male went to the emergency department with complaints of right leg pain. The patient is an avid runner, and knowing this, the provider diagnosed the patient with a right leg muscle strain. The patient was sent home with Flexeril as needed and Motrin 800 mg q8h as needed. One week later, the patient followed up with his primary care doctor with continued right leg pain.

His doctor instructed him to continue to take the muscle relaxant and Motrin, and advised that the pain should subside in 5–10 days. The following day the right leg pain increased, prompting the patient to return to the emergency department. Multiple providers failed to diagnose a blood clot in the patient’s right leg. To prepare: Review Part 11 of the Buttaro et al. text in this week’s Learning Resources. Select one of the cased studies provided. Reflect on what went wrong in this case study, as well as why patient blood clots continue to be misdiagnosed. Think about how you might have prevented the misdiagnosis of the patient the case study. Consider strategies for obtaining patient history, ordering diagnostics, and recommending potential treatment options. Post on or before Day 3 a description of what went wrong in the case study that you selected, as well as why patient blood clots continue to be misdiagnosed. Then, explain how you might have prevented the misdiagnosis of the patient in the study. Include strategies for obtaining patient history, ordering diagnostics, and recommending potential treatment options. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

DQ2 – Types of Anemia In clinical settings, patients often present with many different types of anemia. Each type of anemia has its own causes and implications. For this reason, you must be able to differentiate between types of anemia as well as identify factors that put patients at greater risk of experiencing related complications. As you prepare for this Discussion, consider the following patient case studies: Case Study 1: An 82-year-old female presents to the office complaining of fatigue, dizziness, weakness, and increasing dyspnea on exertion. She has a past medical history of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Medications include warfarin 2 milligrams po daily, lisinopril 10 milligrams po daily, and simvastatin 10 milligrams po daily. There are no known drug allergies. The physical exam reveals a 5’2” older female. Her weight is 128 pounds, blood pressure is 144/80, heart rate is 98, temperature is 98 degrees Fahrenheit, and O2 saturation is 98%. Further examination reveals the following: Eyes: + pallor conjunctiva Cardiac: irregular rhythm. No S3 S4 or M. NO JVD Lungs: CTA w/o rales, wheezes, or rhonchi Abdomen: soft, BS +, + epigastric tenderness.

No organomegaly, rebound, or guarding Rectal: no stool in rectal vault Case Study 2: A 28-year old female presents for a routine physical. She has no complaints. Her personal medical history reveals asthma that is well controlled with an albuterol inhaler prn and Advair 250/50 1 puff BID. Social history reveals she is a nursing student who is a non-smoker, rarely uses alcohol, and is mostly vegetarian. Her physical exam is negative, and she is sent for a CBC/differential and lipid profile. Laboratory results reveal the following: Hemoglobin 10, Hematocrit 30.1, MCV increased. Case Study 3: A 78-year-old female presents to the emergency room after a fall 3 days ago. She recently had a right above-the-knee amputation and was leaning over to pick something up when she fell. She did not want to come to the hospital, but she is having difficulty managing at home because of the pain in her left leg where she fell. Her patient medical history reveals RAKA, peripheral vascular disease, Type 2 diabetes, and stage 3 chronic kidney disease. Current medications include quinapril 20 milligrams PO daily, Lantus 30 units at bedtime, and Humalog to scale before meals. There are no known drug allergies. The physical exam is negative and x-rays reveal no acute injuries. Laboratory studies reveal a normal white blood cell count: Hgb of 8 and HCT 24. The MCV is normal. To prepare: Review Chapter 213 in Part 18 of the Buttaro et al. text. Select one of the three case studies. Reflect on the provided patient information including history, physical exams, and lab reports. Think about a differential diagnosis. Consider the role the patient history, physical exam, and lab reports played in the diagnosis. Reflect on the pathophysiology of the type of anemia that you diagnosed, as well as potential treatment options. Consider the causes of this type of anemia. Think about whether the patient should be referred for specialized care. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 5 Discussion: Examining Chest X-Rays

Chest x-rays are an invaluable diagnostic tool as they can help identify common respiratory disorders such as pneumonia, pleural effusion, and tumors, as well as cardiovascular disorders such as an enlarged heart and heart failure. As an advanced practice nurse, it is important that you are able to differentiate a normal x-ray from an abnormal x-ray in order to identify these disorders. The ability to articulate the results of a chest x-ray with the physician, radiologist, and patient is an essential skill when facilitating care in a clinical setting. In this Discussion, you practice your interprofessional collaboration skills as you interpret chest x-rays and exchange feedback with your colleagues. Consider the four patient x-rays (Note: By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will assign you to post on one of these x-rays): X-ray 1 Note: Please view the Week 5 Discussion area to view the image for X-ray 1. X-ray 2: Note: Please view the Week 5 Discussion area to view the image for X-ray 2. X-ray 3: Note: Please view the Week 5 Discussion area to view the image for X-ray 3. X-ray 4: Note: Please view the Week 5 Discussion area to view the image for X-ray 4. To prepare: Review Part 10 of the Buttaro et al. text in this week’s Learning Resources, as well as the provided x-rays. Reflect on what you see in the x-ray assigned to you by the Course Instructor.Consider whether the patient in your assigned x-ray has an enlarged heart, enlarged blood vessels, fluid in the lungs, and/or pneumonia in the lungs. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 6 Discussion: Diagnosing Gastrointestinal Disorders

In primary care settings, patients often present with abdominal pain. Although this is frequently a sign of a gastrointestinal (GI) disorder, abdominal pain could also be the result of other systemic disorders, making this type of pain difficult to assess. While abdominal pain is most common, many other GI symptoms also overlap multiple disorders, further increasing the difficulty in diagnosing and treating patients. This makes provider-patient communication essential. You must be able to formulate questions that will prompt the patient to provide the necessary information, as this will guide your assessment and diagnosis. For this Discussion, consider potential diagnoses for the patients in the following case studies. Case Study 1: A 49-year-old man presents to the office complaining of vague abdominal discomfort over the past few days. He states he does not feel like eating and has not moved his bowels for the last 2 days. His patient medical history includes an appendectomy at age 22 and borderline hypertension, which he is trying to control with diet and exercise. He takes no medications and has no known allergies. Positive physical exam findings include a temperature of 99.9 degrees Fahrenheit, heart rate of 98, respiratory rate of 24, and blood pressure of 150/72. The abdominal exam reveals abdominal distention, diminished bowel sounds, and lower left quadrant tenderness without rebound. Case Study 2: A 40 year-old female presents to the office with the chief complaint of diarrhea.

She has been having recurrent episodes of abdominal pain, diarrhea, and rectal bleeding. She has lost 9 pounds in the last month. She takes no medications, but is allergic to penicillin. She describes her life as stressful, but manageable. The physical exam reveals a pale middle- aged female in no acute distress. Her weight is 140 pounds (down from 154 at her last visit over a year ago), blood pressure of 94/60 sitting and 86/50 standing, heart rate of 96 and regular without postural changes, respiratory rate of 18, and O2 saturation 99%. Further physical examination reveals: Skin: w/d, no acute lesions or rashes Eyes: sclera clear, conj pale Ears: no acute changes Nose: no erythema or sinus tenderness Mouth: membranes pale, some slight painful ulcerations, right buccal mucosa, tongue beefy red, teeth good repair Neck: supple, no thyroid enlargement or tenderness, no lymphadenopathy Cardio: S1 S2 regular, no S3 S4 or murmur Lungs: CTA w/o rales, wheezes, or rhonchi Abdomen: scaphoid, BS hyperactive, generalized tenderness, rectal +occult bloo Case Study 3: A 52-year-old male presents to the office for a routine physical. The review of symptoms reveals anorexia, heartburn, and weight loss over the past 6 months. The heartburn is long standing, occurring most days during the week. He takes TUMS or Rolaids to relieve the discomfort.

The patient describes occasional use of ibuprofen for back pain, but denies other medications including herbals. He has no known allergies. He was adopted so does not know his family history. Social history reveals that, although he stopped smoking ten years ago, he smoked for 20 years. He occasionally consumes alcohol on the weekends only. The only positive physical exam finding for this patient was slight epigastric tenderness. The remainder of his exam was negative and the rectal exam was negative for blood. To prepare: Review this week’s media presentations and Part 12 of the Buttaro et al. text in the Learning Resources. Select one of the three case studies listed above. Reflect on the provided patient information including history and physical exams. Think about a differential diagnosis. Consider the role the patient history and physical exam played in diagnosis. Reflect on potential treatment options based on your diagnosis. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 7 Discussion: Urinary Frequency

Urinary frequency is a genitourinary disorder that presents problems for adults across the lifespan. It can be the result of various systemic disorders such as diabetes, urinary tract infections, enlarged prostates, kidney infections, or prostate cancer. Many of these disorders have very serious implications requiring thorough patient evaluations. When evaluating patients, it is essential to carefully assess the patient’s personal, medical, and family history prior to recommending certain physical exams and diagnostic testing, as sometimes the benefits of these exams do not outweigh the risks. In this Discussion, you examine a case study of a patient presenting with urinary frequency. Based on the provided patient information, how would you diagnose and treat the patient? Consider the following case study: A 52-year-old African American male presents to an urgent care center complaining of urinary frequency and nocturia. The symptoms have been present for several months and have increased in frequency over the past week. He has been unable to sleep because of the need to urinate at least hourly all day and night. He does not have a primary care provider and has not seen a doctor in more than 10 years. His father died when he was a child in an automobile accident, and his mother is 79 years old and has hypertension.

The patient has no siblings. His social history includes the following: banker by profession, divorced father of two grown children, non-smoker, and occasionally consumes alcohol on weekends only. To prepare: Review Part 13 of the Buttaro et al. text in this week’s Learning Resources. Review the case study and reflect on the information provided about the patient. Think about the personal, medical, and family history you need to obtain from the patient in the case study. Reflect on what questions you might ask during an evaluation. Consider types of physical exams and diagnostics that might be appropriate for evaluation of the patient in the study. Reflect on a possible diagnosis for the patient. Review the Marroquin article in this week’s Learning Resources. If you suspect prostate cancer, consider whether or not you would recommend a biopsy. Think about potential treatment options for the patient. Post on or before Day 3 a description of the history that you need to obtain from the patient in the case study. Include a list of questions that you might ask the patient. Then, describe types of physical exams and diagnostics that might be appropriate for evaluation of the patient. Finally, explain a possible diagnosis, as well as potential treatment options for the patient based on this diagnosis. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 8 Discussion: Electrolyte Disorders

When an electrolyte disorder occurs, it disrupts the balance of ionized salts in the blood. Since electrolytes regulate physiological functions in the body, if left untreated, electrolyte disorders can cause harm to multiple body systems. This results in a variety of symptoms which are sometimes severe and life threatening. In this Discussion, you explore common electrolyte disorders and their potential causes, as well as the impact of the disorders on patients. To prepare: Review Chapters 207, 208, and 241 of the Buttaro et al. text, as well as the Adams et al. and Assadi articles in this week’s Learning Resources. Select one of the following electrolyte disorders: hyperkalemia and hypokalemia; hypercalcemia and hypocalcemia; hypernatremia and hyponatremia; hypermagnesemia and hypomagnesemia. Reflect on signs and symptoms of this disorder. Consider potential causes of the disorder that you selected. Reflect on whether that disorder is iatrogenic or a result of prescribed drugs. Think about the impact of this electrolyte disorder on patients. Consider how the disorder affects other body systems. Post on or before Day 3 a description of the electrolyte disorder that you selected as well as signs and symptoms. Then, explain potential causes of the disorder including whether it is iatrogenic or a result of prescribed drugs. Finally, describe the impact of the disorder on patients and their body systems.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 9 Discussion: Chronic Back Pain

Patients frequently present with complaints of pain such as chronic back pain. They often seek medical care with the intent of receiving drugs to manage the pain. Typically, for this type of pain, narcotic drugs are often prescribed. This can pose challenges for you as the advanced practice nurse prescribing the drugs. While there is a process for evaluating back pain, it can be difficult to assess the intensity of a patient’s pain because pain is a subjective experience. Only the person experiencing the pain truly knows whether there is a need for drug treatments. This makes it important for you, as the prescriber, to watch for red flags and warning signs of abuse. In this Discussion, you explore the ethical implications of prescribing narcotics to patients with chronic back pain. To prepare: Review this week’s media presentation on evaluating back pain, as well as Chapter 15 of the Buttaro et al. text in the Learning Resources. Reflect on the evaluation process for a patient with a history of back pain. Consider how you might evaluate a patient that presents with back pain. Think about potential red flags and warning signs of drug abuse. Reflect on the ethical implications of prescribing narcotics for chronic back pain. Think about what you would prescribe and why. Post on or before Day 3 a description of how you might evaluate a patient who presents with back pain. Then, describe potential red flags and warning signs of drug abuse. Explain the ethical implications of prescribing narcotics for chronic back pain. Finally, explain what you would prescribe for patients and why. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 10 Discussion: Stroke Prevention Media

Note: You will complete this week’s Discussion after you complete this week’s Assignment In this Discussion, you provide and receive feedback on the stroke prevention media created in this week’s Assignment. This exchange between you and your colleagues is an opportunity to practice your interprofessional collaboration skills, which are an essential rudiment of nursing practice. In clinical settings, you must be able to articulately express your thoughts and communicate with colleagues. This Discussion is designed to help you improve this skill, as well as encourage you to listen to your colleagues and acknowledge that all views are valid and worthy of consideration. As you review the stroke prevention media piece created by your colleagues, keep the best interests of the specific patient population in mind. Use the feedback you receive to refine your own stroke prevention media prior to submitting the final Assignment in Week 11. Post on or before Day 4 a description of the stroke prevention media piece that you created. Include the details of your educational media, and if possible, a copy of the actual media piece. Explain why you selected the particular type of media and how and why it is suitable for your patient population. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 11 Discussion: Diabetes

In the United States, 25.6 million adults age 20 years or older have diabetes (American Diabetes Association, 2011). If not properly treated and managed, these millions of diabetic patients are at risk for several alterations including heart disease, stroke, kidney failure, neuropathy, and blindness. Proper treatment and management is the key for diabetic patients, and as the advanced practice nurse providing care for these patients, it is your responsibility to facilitate this process. Patient education is critical, as is working with patients to establish a regular pattern for daily activities such as eating and taking medications. When developing care plans for patients, you must keep the projected outcomes of treatment in mind, as well as patient preferences and other factors that might impact adherence to treatment and management plans. In this Discussion, you draw from your Practicum Experience and consider factors that impact the education and treatment of patients with diabetes.

To prepare: Review Chapter 205 in Part 17 of the Buttaro et al. text. Reflect on the clinical presentation of diabetes, as well as your Practicum Experiences and observations. Select a case from these experiences that involve a diabetic patient. When referring to the patient, make sure to use a pseudonym or other false form of identification. This is to ensure the privacy and protection of the patient. Recall the medical details of the patient in the case that you selected including patient history, clinical presentation, physical exams, diagnostics, and the recommended treatment plan. Select one of the following patient factors: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior. Reflect on how this factor might impact the treatment plan and patient education strategies. Post on or before Day 3 a description of the case that you selected including the diabetic patient’s medical details. Then, explain how the factor that you selected might impact the treatment plan and patient education strategies. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 4 Assignment: Practicum Experience – Journal Entry 

Week 1 question Assignment: Practicum Experience – Journal Entry As a future advanced practice nurse, it is important that you are able to connect your classroom experience to your Practicum Experience. By applying the concepts that you study in the classroom to clinical settings, you enhance your professional competency. Each week, you complete an Assignment such as Journal Entries and SOAP Notes that prompts you to reflect on your Practicum Experiences and relate them to the material presented in the classroom. This week, you begin documenting your Practicum Experiences in your Practicum Journal. To prepare for this course’s Practicum Experience, address the following in your Practicum Journal: Select and describe a nursing theory to guide your practice. Develop goals and objectives for your Practicum Experience in this course. When developing your goals and objectives, be sure to keep the seven domains of practice in mind. Create a timeline of practicum activities based on your practicum requirements. By Day 7 of Week 4 This Assignment is due. You will submit this Week 1 Journal Entry, along with the Week 2 Journal Entry, the Week 3 SOAP Note, and Week 4 Journal Entry by Day 7 of Week 4.

Week 2 question Assignment: Practicum Experience – Journal Entry After completing this week’s Practicum Experience, reflect on pattern recognition in diagnoses. Explain how pattern recognition of patient symptoms might help lead to a diagnosis. If you have not yet been placed at a practicum site, please contact your Instructor. By Day 7 of Week 4 This Assignment is due. You will submit this Week 2 Journal Entry, along with the Week 1 Journal Entry, the Week 3 SOAP Note, and Week 4 Journal Entry by Day 7 of Week 4. Week 3 question Journal In addition to Journal Entries, SOAP Note submissions are a way to reflect on your Practicum Experiences and connect these experiences to your classroom experience. SOAP Notes, such as the ones required in this course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient care. Please refer to the Seidel, et. al. book excerpt and the Gagan article located in this week’s Learning Resources for guidance on writing SOAP Notes. After completing this week’s Practicum Experience, select a patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks.

With this patient in mind, address the following in a SOAP Note: Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding his or her personal and medical history? Objective: What observations did you make during the physical assessment? Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis? What was your plan for treatment and management including alternative therapies? Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation? By Day 7 of Week 4 This Assignment is due. You will submit this Week 3 SOAP Note along with your Journal Entries (Weeks 1, 2, and 4) by Day 7 of Week 4. Week 4 question Assignment: Practicum Experience – Journal Entry After completing this week’s Practicum Experience, reflect on a patient with a known history of a cardiovascular disorder such as a blood clot or arrhythmia. Describe the patient’s personal and medical history, drug therapy and treatments, and follow-up care.

If you did not evaluate a patient with this background during the last four weeks, you may select a related case study from a reputable source or reflect on previous clinical experiences. By Day 7 of Week 4 This Assignment is due. You will submit this Week 4 Journal Entry along with the Week 1 and Week 2 Journal Entries, and the Week 3 SOAP Note by Day 7. Note: Be sure to submit your Assignment to the appropriate submission link below. Submissions should match the following: Week 1 Theory for Practice: Submit to the Assignment Part 1 – Week 4 submission link. Week 2 Pattern Recognition: Submit to the Assignment Part 2 – Week 4 submission link. Week 3 SOAP Note: Submit to the Assignment Part 3 – Week 4 submission link.

Week 4 CV Disorder: Submit to the Assignment Part 4 – Week 4 submission link The Journal Entries are assessed with a Satisfactory (S) or Unsatisfactory (U) score. This concept also applies to Weeks 7 and 10. Submission and Grading Information To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following: Please save your Assignment using the following naming convention: “WK4PTXAssgn+lastname+first initial”. Click the Week 4 Assignment Part X links. Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4PTXAssgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open. If you are submitting multiple files, repeat until all files are attached. Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 5 Assignment 1: Application – Pulmonary Function Testing

Patients with respiratory disorders often require short-term and long-term treatment. While short-term treatments may successfully relieve a patient’s current symptoms, long-term treatment and management is a necessary component of the care plan. Prior to establishing a care plan, it is essential to complete a thorough patient evaluation. Patients presenting with symptoms of respiratory disorders such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently require pulmonary function testing. These pulmonary function tests are designed to assess patient lung function. Results of these tests can be used in conjunction with the COPD guidelines to develop effective treatment and management plans for patients. To prepare: Review the COPD guidelines in the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease article in this week’s Learning Resources. Reflect on COPD diagnosis, management, and prevention strategies suggested in the guidelines. Consider how to implement these strategies in a clinical setting.

Locate and select a case study from a reputable source on a patient whose condition required pulmonary function testing. Consider the COPD guidelines for diagnosis and think about a potential diagnosis for the patient in the case study that you selected. Reflect on treatment and management options based on the patient’s diagnosis. To complete: Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following: Describe COPD diagnosis, management, and prevention strategies suggested in the COPD guidelines. Explain how to implement these strategies in a clinical setting. Explain your diagnosis for the patient in the case study that you selected. Compare the patient’s pulmonary function test results to the COPD guidelines when making your diagnosis.

Describe treatment and management options based on the patient’s diagnosis. By Day 7 of Week 5 This Assignment is due. Reminder: The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm). All papers submitted must use this formatting. Submission and Grading Information To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following: Please save your Assignment using the following naming convention: “WK5PTXAssgn1+lastname+first initial”. Click the Week 5 Assignment 1 Part 1-3 links. Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK5PTXAssgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open. If you are submitting multiple files, repeat until all files are attached. Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 7 Assignment: Practicum Experience – Journal Entry

Week 5 question Assignment 2: Practicum Experience – Journal Entry After completing this week’s Practicum Experience, reflect on a patient with a known history of asthma. Explain potential predisposing genetic and environmental factors associated with asthma. If you did not evaluate a patient with this background during the last 5 weeks, you may select a related case study from a reputable source or reflect on previous clinical experiences. By Day 7 of Week 7 This Assignment is due. You will submit this Week 5 Journal Entry along with the Week 6 Journal Entries and the Week 7 SOAP Note by Day 7 of Week 7 Week 6 question Assignment: Practicum Experience – Journal Entry After completing this week’s Practicum Experience, reflect on a patient who presented with abdominal pain. Describe the patient’s personal and medical history, drug therapy and treatments, and follow-up care.

If you did not evaluate a patient with this background during the last 6 weeks, you may select a related case study from a reputable source or reflect on previous clinical experiences. By Day 7 of Week 7 This Assignment is due. You will submit this Week 6 Journal Entry along with the Week 5 Journal Entry and the Week 7 SOAP Note by Day 7 of Week 7 Week 7 question Assignment: Practicum Experience – SOAP Note and Journal After completing this week’s Practicum Experience, select a patient whom you examined during the last 3 weeks. With this patient in mind, address the following in a SOAP Note: Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding his or her personal and medical history? Objective: What observations did you make during the physical assessment? Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses.

List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis? What was your plan for treatment and management including alternative therapies? Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation? Please refer to the Learning Resources in Week 3 for guidance on writing SOAP Notes. By Day 7 This Assignment is due. You will submit the Week 7 SOAP Note and your Journal Entries (Weeks 5, and 6) by Day 7. Note: Be sure to submit your Assignment to the appropriate submission link below. Submissions should match the following: Week 5 Asthma: Submit to the Assignment Part 1 – Week 7 submission link. Week 6 Abdominal Pain: Submit to the Assignment Part 2 – Week 7 submission link.

Week 7 SOAP Note: Submit to the Assignment Part 3 – Week 7 submission link. Submission and Grading Information To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following: Please save your Assignment using the following naming convention: “WK7PTXAssgn+lastname+first initial”. Click the Week 7 Assignment Part X links. Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK7PTXAssgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open. If you are submitting multiple files, repeat until all files are attached. Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 9 Assignment: Application– Chronic Kidney Disease

Week 8 question Assignment 1: Application– Chronic Kidney Disease According to the National Kidney Foundation, 26 million adults in the United States have chronic kidney disease with millions of others at risk (National Kidney Foundation, 2012). Over time, this disorder will become progressively worse, and patients will eventually experience a loss of renal function. Early detection and prevention is key for patients with this disorder. For this reason, it is important for you, as the provider, to be aware of various signs, symptoms, and risk factors of chronic kidney disease. In this Assignment, you explore the disorder including the role that patient history, physical exams, and diagnostics play in diagnosis and treatment. To prepare: Review Chapter 149 in Part 13 of the Buttaro et al. text in this week’s Learning Resources. Reflect on the clinical presentation of chronic kidney disease. Think about how you might diagnose a patient with chronic kidney disease. Consider the role that patient history, physical exams, and diagnostics play in diagnosis.

Reflect on potential treatment options for chronic kidney disease including the implications of prescribed drugs. Consider the following patient factors: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, and behavior. Think about how these factors might impact the diagnosis and treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease. To complete: Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following Describe the clinical presentation of chronic kidney disease. Explain how you might diagnose a patient with chronic kidney disease including the role that patient history, physical exams, and diagnostics play in diagnosis. Explain implications of potential treatment options for this disease including prescribed drugs. Describe how patient factors might impact the diagnosis and treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease. Week 9 question Assignment 1: Application – Chronic Kidney Disease (Due)

By Day 7 Submit Assignment: Chronic Kidney Disease. This Assignment was presented in Week 8 and is due by Day 7 of Week 9. Submission and Grading Information To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following: Please save your Assignment using the following naming convention: “WK9Assgn+lastname+first initial”. Click the Week 9 Assignment link. Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open. If you are submitting multiple files, repeat until all files are attached. Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 10 Assignment: Practicum Experience – Journal Entry

Week 8 question Assignment 2: Practicum Experience – Journal Entry After completing this week’s Practicum Experience, reflect on a patient with a known history of a renal disorder. Describe the patient’s personal and medical history, drug therapy and treatments, and follow-up care. If you did not evaluate a patient with this background during the last 8 weeks, you may select a related case study from a reputable source or reflect on previous clinical experiences. By Day 7 of Week 10 This Assignment is due. You will submit this Week 8 Journal Entry along with the Week 9 Journal Entry and the Week 10 SOAP Note by Day 7 of Week 10. Week 9 question Assignment 2: Practicum Experience – Journal Entry After completing this week’s Practicum Experience, reflect on a patient with a known history of a musculoskeletal disorder. Describe the patient’s personal and medical history, drug therapy and treatments, and follow-up care. If you did not evaluate a patient with this background during the last 9 weeks, you may select a related case study from a reputable source or reflect on previous clinical experiences. By Day 7 of Week 10 This Assignment is due.

You will submit this Week 9 Journal Entry along with the Week 8 Journal Entries, and the Week 10 SOAP Note by Day 7 of Week 10. Week 10 question Assignment 2: Practicum Experience – SOAP Note and Journal After completing this week’s Practicum Experience, select a patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks. With this patient in mind, address the following in a SOAP Note: Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding his or her personal and medical history? Objective: What observations did you make during the physical assessment? Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis? What was your plan for treatment and management including alternative therapies? Reflection notes: What would you do differently in a similar patient evaluation? Please refer to the Learning Resources in Week 3 for guidance on writing SOAP Notes. By Day 7 You will submit the Week 10 SOAP Note and your Journal Entries (Weeks 8 and 9) by Day 7.

Note: Be sure to submit your Assignment to the appropriate submission link below. Submissions should match the following: Week 8 Renal Disorder: Submit to the Assignment 2 Part 1 – Week 10 submission link. Week 9 Musculoskeletal Disorder: Submit to the Assignment 2 Part 2 – Week 10 submission link. Week 10 SOAP Note: Submit to the Assignment 2 Part 3 – Week 10 submission link. Submission and Grading Information To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following: Please save your Assignment using the following naming convention: “WK11PTXAssgn2+lastname+first initial”. Click the Week 11 Assignment 2 Part X links. Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11PTXAssgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open. If you are submitting multiple files, repeat until all files are attached. Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

Week 11 Assignment: Application – Patient Education on Stroke Prevention

Week 10 question Assignment 1: Application – Patient Education on Stroke Prevention A stroke is a serious disorder that impacts patients quickly, requiring immediate intervention and treatment. Due to implications of this disorder, patient education is essential for patient populations at an increased risk of stroke. According to the National Stroke Association, up to 80% of strokes can be prevented in patients (National Stroke Association, 2012). For this reason, it is essential that you provide patients with the education and tools necessary to reduce their risk as well as identify signs and symptoms of strokes. In this Assignment, you have the opportunity to give back to your practicum site by creating media to educate patients about stroke prevention. When designing patient education media such as flyers, posters, and music, it is important to consider strategies that meet the needs of the patient population you treat at your practicum site. Note: This Assignment is the focus of the week’s Discussion and should be completed and ready to post by Day 4.

To prepare: Review the stroke prevention articles in this week’s Learning Resources. Reflect on common lifestyle, behavioral, and cultural choices of the population that you treat within your practicum setting. Consider stroke prevention methods for this population. Think about ways to educate patients on these prevention methods. Consider educational pieces such as flyers, posters, or other media that might be most effective with your patient population. To complete: Design a media piece to educate patients on stroke prevention. You may create a flyer, poster, or any other media that is suitable for your patient population. By Day 7 of Week 11 This Assignment is due. Prior to your final submission, be sure to use the feedback your colleagues provide in the Discussion to further refine your stroke prevention media.

Week 11 question Assignment 1: Application – Patient Education on Stroke Prevention (Due) By Day 7 Submit the Patient Education on Stroke Prevention Assignment. This Assignment was presented in Week 10 and is due by Day 7. Submission and Grading Information To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following: Please save your Assignment using the following naming convention: “WK11Assgn1+lastname+first initial”. Click the Week 11 Assignment 1 link. Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open. If you are submitting multiple files, repeat until all files are attached. Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. NURS6531 Full Course Work latest

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Who We Are 

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NURS6531 Full Course Work

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. NURS6531 Full Course Work

  • Guarantee NURS6531 Full Course Work

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, affordable, plagiarism-free paper

NURS6531 Week 1 discussion

NURS6531 Week 1 discussion: Competencies for Nurse Practitioners

NURS6531 Week 1 discussion: Competencies for Nurse Practitioners The Consensus Model for APRN Regulation has brought about changes in the competencies for nurse practitioners. There are Core Competencies for all nurse practitioner populations and include both MSN and DNP degrees. Review your Learning Resources Page to examine the Core Competencies. Family/Across the Lifespan competencies Adult-Gerontology NP competencies The major categories of family/across the lifespan competencies include the following: Scientific Foundation; Leadership; Quality; Practice Inquiry; Technology and Information Literacy; Policy; Health Delivery System; Ethics; and Independent Practice. In this Discussion, you explore the nine competencies, and their application to the clinical setting. The adult-gerontology NP competencies are different and students in that specialty should become familiar with them.

To prepare: Review this week’s media presentation with Dr. Terry Buttaro, as well as the “Nurse Practitioner Self-Appraisal Guide” in the Learning Resources. Review the Consensus Model for APRN Regulation and the National Organization for Nurse Practitioner Faculties Core Competencies and population foci competencies. Consider the following nine competencies (Note: By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will assign you to post on one of these nine competencies): Scientific Foundation Leadership Quality Practice Inquiry Technology and Information Literacy Policy Health Delivery System Ethics Independent Practice Reflect on the category that was assigned to you by the Course Instructor. Think about how you would implement this competency in a clinical setting. Consider evidence-based clinical practice. Post on or before Day 3 a brief description of the competency that was assigned to you. With your competency description in mind, explain how you would implement it in a clinical setting. Support your rationale with evidence from current research.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Week 2 Discussion: Diagnosing Skin, Eye, Ear, and Throat Disorders

When entering examination rooms, advanced practice nurses often immediately begin assessing patients by looking for external abnormalities such as skin irritations or cloudy eyes. By making these simple observations, they can determine how to proceed with their patient evaluations. During the patient evaluation, advanced practice nurses will use initial observations to guide them in acquiring the necessary medical history, performing additional assessments, and ordering the appropriate diagnostics. The information obtained during this evaluation process will help in the development of a differential diagnosis. Once a diagnosis is made, the advanced practice nurse can consider potential treatment options and work with the patient to develop a plan of care. For this Discussion, consider the following four case studies of patients presenting with skin, eye, ear, and throat disorders Case Study 1: A 46-year-old male presents to the office complaining of a pruritic skin rash that has been present for a few weeks. He initially noted the rash on his chest, but it then spread to his back and arms. He notes that it does not seem to be on his legs. He recently came home from a trip to Florida, but denies fever, chills, new soaps or detergents, other travel, or known insect bites.

He takes occasional ibuprofen for knee pain, but denies taking other medications or having other health problems. He has no known drug allergies. The physical examination reveals a male with a deep tan and notable scattered 1–1.5-centimeter, flat, circular, light-colored patches on his chest, back, and upper extremities. Case Study 2: An 86-year-old widowed female is brought to the office by her daughter-in-law. The patient complains of constant tearing and an itchy, burning sensation in both eyes. The patient states this is not a new problem, but it has worsened in the past week and is affecting her vision. The patient complains that her eyes are dry. She thinks the problem must be caused by one of her medications. Her patient medical history is positive for hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. She has an allergy to erythromycin that causes rash and elevated liver enzymes. Medications currently prescribed include Furosemide 40 milligrams po twice a day, diltiazem 240 milligrams po daily, lisinopril 20 milligrams po daily, and warfarin 3 milligrams po daily. The physical examination reveals a frail older female with some facial dryness and slight scaling. Her visual acuity is 20/60 OU, 20/40 OD, 20/60 OS. The eyelids are erythematous and edematous with yellow crusting around the lashes. Sclera are injected, conjunctiva are pale, and pupils are equal and reactive to light and accommodation.

Case Study 3: A middle-aged male presents to the office complaining of a two-day history of a left earache. The onset was gradual, but has steadily been increasing. It has been constantly aching since last night, and his hearing seems diminished to him. Today he thinks the left side of his face may even be swollen. He denies upper respiratory infection, known fever, or chills. His patient medical history is positive for Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The patient has a known allergy to Amoxicillin that results in pruritus. Medications currently prescribed include Metformin 1,000 milligrams po twice a day, lisinopril 20 milligrams po daily, Aspirin 81 milligrams po daily, and simvastatin 40 milligrams po daily. The physical exam reveals a middle aged male at a weight of 160 pounds, height of 5’8”, temperature of 98.8 degrees Fahrenheit, heart rate of 88, respiratory rate of 18, and blood pressure of 138/76. Further examination reveals the following: Face: Faint asymmetry with left periauricular area slightly edematous Eyes: sclera clear, conj wnl L ear: + tenderness L pinna, + edema, erythema, exudates left external auditory canal, TM not visible R ear: no tenderness, R external auditory canal clear without edema, erythema, exudates + tenderness L preauricular node, otherwise no lymphadenopathy Cardiac: S1 S2 regular. No S3 S4 or murmur. Lungs: CTA w/o rales, wheezes, or rhonchi.

Case Study 4: A middle-aged female presents to the office complaining of strep throat. She states she suddenly developed a sore throat yesterday afternoon, and it has gotten worse since then. During the night she felt like she was chilled and feverish. She denies known recent contact with anyone else who had strep throat, but states she has had strep before and it feels like she has strep now. She takes no medications, but is allergic to penicillin. The physical examination reveals a slender female lying on the examination table. She has a temperature of 101 degrees Fahrenheit, heart rate of 112, respiratory rate of 22, and blood pressure of 96/64. The head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat evaluation is positive for bilateral tonsillar swelling without exudates. Her neck is supple with bilateral, tender, enlarged anterior cervical nodes.

To prepare: Review this week’s media presentations and Parts 5–8 of the Buttaro et al. text. Select one of the four case studies provided. Reflect on the provided patient information including history and physical exams. Think about a differential diagnosis. Consider the role the patient history and physical exam played in your diagnosis. Reflect on potential treatment options based on your diagnosis. Post on or before Day 3 an explanation of the differential diagnosis for the patient in the case study that you selected. Describe the role the patient history and physical exam played in the diagnosis. Then, suggest potential treatment options based on your patient diagnosis.

FP6103 Assessment 2

Capella FP6103 Assessment 2 latest

Capella FP6103 Assessment 2 latest Create a 2-page plan addressing the scholarship, service, and teaching elements of a specific nurse educator role in a specific context. When we say we are nurse educators, the image that comes to mind for many is that of a nursing instructor in an undergraduate nursing program. The work that person is engaged in is teaching others how to be nurses. While that is certainly one aspect of the nurse educator role, the setting and the work may vary greatly. Some nurse educators, especially in university settings, will hold joint appointments as nursing faculty in a college of nursing and as clinicians in the university hospital. Other educators will work exclusively in a hospital or community setting, educating staff, patients, or community. Regardless of the setting, the role of educator encompasses more than teaching; there is also an expectation for scholarship and for service. In this tripartite role, faculty in universities and colleges are expected to teach, participate in scholarly activities, and participate in service, which is defined as activities contributing to the good of the community, university, or profession beyond one’s defined job description.

Many health care institutions will also have similar expectations for nurses in upper-level positions. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 2: Analyze the tripartite role of teaching, service, and scholarship. Describe a specific nurse educator role. Analyze the teaching, service, and scholarship expectations for a chosen nurse educator role. Competency 5: Articulate how nurse educators serve as change agents and leaders to help advance nursing education and nursing practice. Analyze qualifications in a chosen nurse educator role that facilitate being a change agent. Competency 6: Develop a plan for engaging in scholarship in an established area of expertise. Explain opportunities for scholarship related to a specific area of expertise. Competency 7: Establish a plan for pursuing continuous improvement in the nurse educator role. Generate a plan for meeting each aspect of the tripartite model. Competency 8: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations for a nursing education professional.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, mechanics, and APA format and style as expected of a nursing education professional. Create a short (approximately 2 pages) plan reflecting on how the three aspects of the tripartite model of teaching, service, and scholarship could be met for a particular nurse educator position in a context of interest to you. In your plan, do the following: Describe the nurse educator role that your plan addresses, as well as any other pertinent details about that role. Be sure to give the role’s title and explain the context in which that role works. Analyze the teaching, service, and scholarship expectations for that role as you understand them, and how those expectations fit with the role.

Identify publications, journals, and conferences that could be a fit for the scholarship conducted in this role. Explain the kinds of scholarship that would be a good fit for person in this role and with this expertise. Generate a plan that could be used by a person in this role for meeting each of the expectations you analyzed. Analyze additional qualifications that you believe are needed for this role (additional education, certifications, skills, and so on), explaining why they are necessary. Analyze the qualifications and areas of expertise related to this role that would facilitate serving as a change agent.

Additional Requirements

Your plan should meet the following requirements: Written communication: Written communication should be free of grammar and spelling errors that distract from the content. APA format: Use correct APA format, including running head, page numbers, and a title page. Citations and references (if used) are to be in correct APA format. Format: Submit your assessment as a Word document. Length: Approximately two double-spaced pages, not including the title page and references page. Font and font size: Times New Roman or Arial, 12 point.

Capella FP6103 Assessment 3 latest

Capella FP6103 Assessment 3 latest

Capella FP6103 Assessment 3 latest Write a 3–5-page nurse educator philosophy. As nurses, we develop our own philosophy about our role as a nurse. For some, it is steeped in the tradition of the nursing program we attended. For most of us, our philosophy has evolved over time, as we gain experience and develop specializations. We may not always articulate a clear philosophy, but each nurse does have a system of beliefs and values about health, health care, nursing, and his or her role as a nurse that guides practice. By developing a philosophy specific to the role of nurse educator, you will be able to reflect upon your individual values and beliefs, values and beliefs about nursing, and the educator role that each person is preparing for. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Analyze the historical evolution of nursing education. Analyze the influence of historical events on a nurse educator role.

Competency 2: Analyze the tripartite role of teaching, service, and scholarship. Formulate an informed nurse educator philosophy statement. Apply a nurse educator philosophy to the tripartite roles of teaching, scholarship, and service. Competency 3: Analyze professionally established nurse educator competencies and models. Analyze the competencies necessary for a specific nurse educator role. Competency 8: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations for a nursing education professional. Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, mechanics, and APA format and style as expected of a nursing education professional. For this assessment, develop your own nurse educator philosophy statement. Identify your beliefs and values regarding the adult learner, learning environment, and teaching strategies and applicable learning theories that you will use as an educator. Address how this philosophy will guide you in the tripartite roles of a nurse educator—how it will guide your teaching, scholarship, and service. Support your philosophy with your knowledge of historical events that are pertinent to your work. In addition, identify the competencies that you see as critical to your role. Capella FP6103 Assessment 3 latest

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

In sum, your philosophy statement should guide your practice as a nurse educator. Your educator philosophy statement should do the following: Identify the area of nursing education or the area in health care in which you will apply your MSN, education specialization skills, and knowledge. Formulate your nurse educator philosophy statement, which should comprise your beliefs and values regarding the adult learner, learning environment, and teaching strategies and applicable learning theories that you will use as an educator. Apply your philosophy statement to each of the tripartite roles of the nurse educator. What does your philosophy mean for your approach to teaching, scholarship, and service? As you discuss the role of teacher, be sure to address any theories (adult learning theory, learner-center education, and others) that shape your approach as an educator. Analyze the relationship of significant historical events that have shaped the role you seek to fill. Analyze the most essential nurse educator competencies necessary for this MSN-prepared nurse educator. Explain why you selected the competencies you did. Conclude with a summary.

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should meet the following requirements: Written communication: Written communication should be free of grammar and spelling errors that distract from the content. APA format: Use correct APA format, including running head, page numbers, and a title page. Citations and references (if used) are to be in correct APA format. Format: Submit your assessment as a Word document. Length: 3–5 double-spaced pages, not including the title page and references page. Font and font size: Times New Roman or Arial, 12 point.

FP6103 Assessment 4

Capella FP6103 Assessment 4 Latest

Capella FP6103 Assessment 4 Latest Write a 6–8-page professional development plan for your work as a nurse educator. Learning never stops for the nurse educator. Lifelong learning is necessary to stay current both in the practice world and in education. Nurse educators need to have a plan for their own continued professional development that will help them maintain and advance their skills both as nurses and as educators. The nursing profession needs nurse educators to educate more nurses, to introduce and educate about evidence-based practice changes, and more than ever, to join with our colleagues in other health care disciplines to exchange ideas and engage in interdisciplinary learning. As educators, we must continue to learn, be certified, and function at a high level to ensure continued growth for the nursing profession. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Analyze the historical evolution of nursing education. Describe forces (social, economic, political, or institutional) that may influence the nurse educator role.

Competency 3: Analyze professionally established nurse educator competencies and models. Describe area of focus as a nurse educator, associated educator competencies, and professional goals in relation to nurse educator philosophy. Competency 4: Apply knowledge of legal and ethical issues relevant to higher education and nursing education. Assess abilities to meet goals, achieve professional development, and maintain ethical practices. Competency 5: Articulate how nurse educators serve as change agents and leaders to help advance nursing education and nursing practice. Discuss development of a leadership role in a chosen area of nurse educator focus. Competency 6: Develop a plan for engaging in scholarship in an established area of expertise. Develop a scholarship plan that includes analysis of how scholarship will be carried out in the nurse educator role. Competency 7: Establish a plan for pursuing continuous improvement in the nurse educator role. Develop specific plans for professional growth that identify any additional education, certifications, or training to be acquired. Competency 8: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations for a nursing education professional. Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, mechanics, and APA format and style as expected of a nursing education professional.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Write a 6–8-page professional development plan for your career as an MSN-prepared nurse. The professional development plan should include the following: Introduction: A brief introductory paragraph that clearly states the purpose of the paper. Area of focus: A description of your specific area of focus in nursing education, the position that you wish to obtain, and the educator competencies that you will need as an MSN-prepared nurse. Professional goals: A statement of your specific professional goals (a minimum of three) and discussion of their relationship to your nurse educator philosophy. Influences: A brief description of any additional forces (social, economic, political, or institutional) that may influence your nursing education role.

Analysis: An analysis of how you will carry out scholarship activities as an MSN-prepared nurse and a specific plan for scholarship based on a model. Leadership role: A discussion of specific ways (a minimum of two) that you will develop a leadership role in your chosen area of focus. Development plan: Specific plans for professional growth and any additional education, certifications, or training to be acquired. Reflection: A reflection in a concluding paragraph on your abilities to meet goals and achieve your professional development plan and ethical practice. Capella FP6103 Assessment 4 Latest

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should meet the following requirements: Written communication: Written communication should be free of grammar and spelling errors that distract from the content. APA format: Use correct APA format, including running head, page numbers, and a title page. Citations and references (if used) are to be in correct APA format. Format: Submit your assessment as a Word document. Length: 6–8 double-spaced pages, not including the title page and references page. Font and font size: Times New Roman or Arial, 12 point.

Capella FP6103 Assessment 5 Latest

Capella FP6103 Assessment 5 Latest

Capella FP6103 Assessment 5 Latest Create a 12–20-slide PowerPoint presentation for teaching a legal or ethical issue pertinent to nurse educators. As nurses we are all, no doubt, very aware of the myriad of legal and ethical issues in any health care setting. We are familiar with licensing for health care professionals, perhaps, carry our own malpractice insurance, and have been cautioned by our employing institutions to always follow policy and procedures. Nursing education is no different; there are specific legal and ethical issues that are of concern to nurse educators. Additionally, nurse educators are often called upon to teach others about specific legal and ethical issues. This can create an interesting balance between adhering to the legal and ethical responsibility of the nurse educator’s role, while also providing enough context and real-world evidence to help assist others in learning about specific legal and ethical issues. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 4: Apply knowledge of legal and ethical issues relevant to higher education and nursing education.

Describe a legal or ethical issue that requires changes in staff, faculty, or student behaviors. Synthesize resource information needed to evoke a change in the described situation. Competency 5: Articulate how nurse educators serve as change agents and leaders to help advance nursing education and nursing practice. Create a teaching presentation on a legal or ethical issue designed to evoke change in staff, faculty, or a student group. Identify culturally sensitive issues and how they should be addressed in the change process. Competency 7: Establish a plan for pursuing continuous improvement in the nurse educator role. Develop specific plans for continuous learning about a legal or ethical issue impacting nurse educators. Competency 8: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with the expectations for a nursing education professional. Design a PowerPoint presentation consistent with current professional standards that demonstrates correct grammar, usage, and mechanics in addition to following APA standards.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation

In this assessment, you will create a PowerPoint presentation of 12–20 slides that you could use to teach a group about a legal or ethical issue related to nursing or nursing education. To do so, you will select a case from the Nursing Education Legal and Ethical Scenarios media piece, linked in the Resources under the Capella Multimedia heading to focus on. Review the case and take time to reflect on the change that needs to occur and the group that you will be addressing. Research what the group needs to know to improve the legal or ethical situation that has occurred. Use a minimum of seven references, of which at least five should come from peer-reviewed sources. As you conduct research, synthesize information that will be needed to evoke a change in the situation. Capella FP6103 Assessment 5 Latest

Instructions

Create a 12–20 slide PowerPoint presentation that you would use to teach about the legal or ethical situation and to create change related to that situation. Note: You must include 2–4 context slides. These are additional slides that provide contextual information for this assessment. Follow the guidelines for the two types of slides below.

Presentation Slides For your 12–20 slide presentation: Choose an appropriate theme and style. Include an introductory slide that identifies the problem and your role. Use slides to convey the important information and understandings to the group. Provide a summary slide that reiterates the important points of the presentation. Provide a slide that offers resources for the group after the teaching/learning experience. Include a slide with any references used in preparing the PowerPoint. Use the speaker’s notes feature to provide any additional information that you would include in the presentation. This should include any cultural sensitivity aspects and how the content is expected to make a change regarding the issue being addressed.

Context Slides For the 2–4 contextual slides (which are not considered part of the actual presentation but rather should contain information that you as a presenter would need to consider in your preparation and presentation): Discuss any specific cultural and/or diversity aspects of the presentation that could be significant in the learning process. Include references and sources used to inform this. Analyze how the presentation may result in a significant change in the identified environment. Cite any relevant sources. Develop specific plans for how you might stay informed about the legal or ethical issue that was your focus. What resources could you use to learn about changes or developments that would impact your work?

Additional Requirements

Your presentation should meet the following requirements: Presentation: Create a professional-looking PowerPoint presentation, using speaker notes throughout. Written communication: Written communication should be free of grammar and spelling errors that distract from the content. APA format: Use correct APA format for all citations and references. Length: 12–20 slides for teaching presentation plus 2–4 additional contextual slides. Be sure to include the references slide.

FP5004 Full Cours

Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP5004 Assessment 1

Draft a proposal of 4–5 pages for the development of an interprofessional team to address a problem in delivering safe, high-quality health care. Read each portion of the assessment carefully and see if the suggested resources can help you complete it. Effective interprofessional collaboration is an essential strategy for health care leaders in delivering safe, high-quality health care and reducing costs. The ability to establish effective professional relationships among internal and external resources is the foundation of collaboration (Lawson, 2004). This assessment provides an opportunity to consider the practical value and implementation of a collaborative strategy in your professional practice or area of interest. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Explain the concepts, principles, and characteristics of effective health care leadership. Analyze the factors contributing to a problematic health care issue. Competency 2: Explain the role of health care leaders in facilitating interprofessional collaboration. Explain the need for interprofessional collaboration to improve the quality and safety of health care in specific instances. Assess the effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative relationships. Develop a collaborative plan for improving the quality and safety of health care in specific instances. Determine the leader’s role in implementing collaborative health care improvement projects. Competency 4: Determine the influence of the practitioner-scholar role on professional practice and leadership development. Determine how the practitioner-scholar model might be applied in resolving a particular health care issue. Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. Develop a strategy for communicating the progress of interprofessional teams to organizational leaders. Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting. Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

Reference Lawson, H. (2004). The logic of collaboration in education and the human services. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(3), 225–237.

Preparation Health care leaders often find that resolving a problem in delivering safe, high-quality health care requires the combined effort of a number of agencies, departments, and individuals. For this assessment, identify a quality-related situation or problem relevant to your professional practice or area of interest that requires the collaborative effort of several departments and individuals to resolve. You will assume the role of team leader and draft a proposal for the organization’s executive leadership that outlines why this interprofessional team is necessary, who should take part in the collaboration, how the team will function, and how progress will be reported. A project proposal should identify the situation or problem, identify the causes or contributing factors, present a plan of action, provide details about the plan, and provide reasons why the plan should be undertaken. Note: Remember, you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of your proposal for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback if you plan on using this free service.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Proposal Requirements Write a proposal for assembling an interprofessional team. As you begin drafting your proposal, consider your goal and the needs of the leaders whose decisions will be based on the information you provide. Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Interprofessional Collaboration scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. You are provided an example proposal that illustrates what proficient-level work for this assessment looks like. Proposal Format and APA Style Use the simplified Project Proposal Template, linked in the Resources, to draft your proposal. You may organize the content of your proposal in a format used in your organization. An abstract is not required. Your proposal should be 4–6 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.

Writing Be concise, but thorough. Your readers need sufficient and accurate information on which to base their decisions, and do not have time to sift through information that is not pertinent. Express your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently. Use correct grammar and mechanics. Be sure to support your claims, arguments, and conclusions with credible evidence from 3–5 current, scholarly or professional sources. Proofread your writing.

Plan Content Analyze the factors that have contributed to the problem. ( Hint: Examine the reasons for ineffective communication, not just the communication itself. Reasons may include staff burnout, workload, staffing shortfalls, attitudes, assumptions, and so on.) Consider whether certain combinations of factors might be contributing to the problem. Explain why an interprofessional team is needed to address the problem and achieve expected project outcomes. Determine who should be on the team. Identify the disciplines or areas team members should come from and any specific job titles prospective team members should hold. Describe the knowledge and expertise each discipline has to offer in resolving the situation. In addition, consider the level of creativity and problem-solving skills that are needed. Assess the effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative relationships.

Consider how effective that approach is in: Encouraging participation by all team members. Engaging reluctant or resistant team members. Maintaining a respectful platform for members to voice their ideas. Develop a strategy for communicating progress by the team to executive leadership. Determine which approach to communicating with leaders will be most effective and efficient. Determine whether you will have regular meetings and generate status reports. Develop a collaborative plan for resolving the problem. Identify the ethical or political issues that are relevant factors in your proposed solution. Identify the social, cultural, or economic factors that are relevant to your proposed solution. Explain how you would address the ethical, political, social, cultural, or economic factors you have identified as relevant to your plan. Describe your role as a leader in implementing the proposed solution. Determine how the practitioner-scholarmodel might be applied in resolving the problem. Consider how theory, research, and the published work in the field, in conjunction with your own experience and professional knowledge, might be used to develop strategies to analyze and resolve the problem. Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information. Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP5004 Assessment 2

Write an executive report of 4–5 pages that analyzes the role of diversity in an underperforming community program, unit, or department, and outline a plan for providing ongoing training on cultural awareness, inclusion, and sensitivity to current employees. Be sure you read all of the requirements for this assessment and review the suggested resources to see if they may be useful in completing the assessment. This assessment provides an opportunity to determine how you can help advance your professional field by developing a strategy for managing diversity that recognizes the synergy achieved by having a diverse and inclusive workforce. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Explain the concepts, principles, and characteristics of effective health care leadership. Determine the influence of effective leadership on the development of a diverse and culturally competent workforce.

Competency 3: Analyze standards of professional ethics and the principles of diversity and inclusion as applied by health care leaders in real-world situations. Outline a plan to recruit, hire, and retain a diverse workforce. Outline a plan for providing employee training on cultural awareness and sensitivity. Explain the benefits of a diverse and culturally competent workforce to a health care organization and the community it serves. Competency 4: Determine the influence of the practitioner-scholar role on professional practice and leadership development. Explain how the academic and research skills one develops as a practitioner-scholar can be of service in one’s role as a health care leader. Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting.

Preparation Use the following case study as the basis of this assessment. Imagine you are the manager of a new health care facility satellite office or community outreach center located in a diverse neighborhood. The parent organization opened the facility to address the underserved health care needs of the culturally diverse residents who were not using the services offered at the main facility. The first month of operation saw a very high volume of patients, but since then, the numbers have dropped off drastically. Executive leadership wants to understand why this has happened and what you plan to do about it. After careful examination of all aspects of the facility, and talking with some of the neighborhood residents, you have determined that the residents do not feel comfortable coming to the facility because the staff does not represent the diversity of the neighborhood. Staff members were hired for their skill, but their diversity was not considered. Now, you must report to executive leadership what you have learned and how you intend to manage diversity. Note: Remember, you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of your proposal for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback if you plan on using this free service.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Report Requirements Write an executive report on the need for a diverse, culturally competent staff, including your plans to address that need. Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Managing Diversity scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. You are provided an example report, to illustrate what proficient-level work for this assessment looks like. Report Format and APA Style Use the Executive Report Template, linked in the Resources, to draft your report. You may also organize the content of your report in a format used in your organization. An abstract is not required. Your report should be 4–5 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.

Writing As you begin composing your report, consider the purpose of the report, the appropriate tone and style, and the expectations of the executive leaders who will be reading it. Be clear and concise in your reporting. Express your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently. Use correct grammar and mechanics. Be sure to support your claims and arguments with credible evidence from 3–5 current, scholarly or professional sources. Proofread your writing. Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

Report Content Outline a plan to recruit, hire, and retain a more diverse workforce. Note: Your outline should be a high-level overview of a plan, not a detailed plan. Other courses in your program will go into human resource practices and diversity in depth. In drafting your plan, consider the following questions: How does a leader develop a diverse workforce? Where will you look for more diverse employees? Will you post job ads? What will the interviewing and hiring process look like? Who will do the interviewing? Who will make the final decisions? What kind of incentives will you offer diverse employees to retain them? What do you need to know about the culture and values of diverse employees before developing a retention plan? How will you address issues related to diversity that result in conflict?

Outline a plan for the ongoing training and professional development of existing staff in cultural awareness and sensitivity. Consider how your plan can: Improve communications and interpersonal skills. Help overcome bias and resistance to change. Explain the benefits, to both the organization and the community it serves, of having a diverse and culturally competent workforce. Explain the relationship between health care organizations and communities. Explain the role that diversity plays in providing culturally competent care and access for the under-served in a community. Determine the influence of effective leadership on the development of a diverse and culturally competent workforce. Explain the importance of cultural competence for leaders in an organization. Explain how the academic and research skills you develop as a practitioner-scholar can serve you in your role as an effective health care leader. Explain how those skills might contribute to your credibility and effectiveness as a leader. Explain how those skills might prepare you to lead a diverse workforce. Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.

Capella FP5004 Assessment 3

Complete a leadership self-assessment of 5–7 pages. Be sure you read all of the requirements for this assessment and review the suggested resources to see if they may be useful in completing the assessment. The health care environment is complex, requiring leadership that is comprehensive and collaborative in the field. It is essential for leaders to be well-versed in a range of areas (practice, research, education) as a means of effective engagement with interprofessional communities. Effective leaders have heightened awareness of self and individual leadership styles, leading to professional growth, career advancement, and the ability to develop leaders for the future across the fields of practice (nursing, health administration, public health). This assessment provides an opportunity to analyze your own leadership qualities to create a portrait of the effective health care professional and leader you aspire to be. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Explain the concepts, principles, and characteristics of effective health care leadership. Analyze one’s leadership strengths and weaknesses, in reference to one or more leadership theories or styles found in the literature. Explain how one’s specific leadership characteristics enable oneself to guide, educate, inform, and influence others in managing change.

Competency 2: Explain the role of health care leaders in facilitating interprofessional collaboration. Explain how one’s specific leadership characteristics help oneself build and maintain interprofessional collaborative relationships. Competency 3: Analyze standards of professional ethics and the principles of diversity and inclusion as applied by health care leaders in real-world situations. Explain how one can best apply the principles of ethical leadership, given one’s leadership style. Explain why diversity and inclusion are important to employee relations and the provision of safe, high-quality health care. Explain how one’s specific leadership characteristics prepare oneself to develop and lead a diverse team of employees and serve a diverse community, within an ethical framework. Competency 4: Determine the influence of the practitioner-scholar role on professional practice and leadership development. Explain how research skills and critical thinking guide effective decision making and foster integrity in research and professional practice. Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting.

Preparation You have been offered the opportunity to apply for a leadership position in your organization. As a part of the application process, your potential employer uses the National Center for Healthcare Leadership (NCHL) competency model of leadership development (NCHL, 2016), which includes a 360-degree evaluation. The evaluation is an assessment that includes anonymous, confidential feedback from those around you, such as your peers, supervisor, direct reports, and stakeholders, as well as a self-assessment on behavior (relational), technical and operational skills, and strategic ability.

As a part of this 360-degree evaluation, you will complete the self-assessment component. This information will be shared with the interview committee for the position, so it is important that you demonstrate your knowledge and experience in each of the areas outlined in the self-assessment requirements below. Note: Remember, you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of your work for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback if you plan on using this free service. Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Reference National Center for Healthcare Leadership. (2016). NCHL organizational assessments. Retrieved from http://www.nchl.org/static.asp?path=2852,3241

Self-Assessment Requirements Complete a leadership self-assessment to create a portrait of the effective health care professional and leader you aspire to be. Note: The assessment requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Leadership Self-Assessment scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. You are provided an example leadership self-assessment to illustrate what proficient-level work for this assessment looks like. Self-Assessment Format and APA Style Use the APA Paper template, linked in the Resources, to draft your self-assessment. An abstract is not required. Your self-assessment should be 5–7 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.

Writing Note: Because this assessment requires you to develop a leadership self-assessment, you may write using first-person voice. However, it is important for your development as a practitioner-scholar to recognize that writing in the first person is not usually acceptable in academic papers, which are written in the third-person. Consequently, you should always carefully consider departing from this norm. Be clear and concise in your writing. Express your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently. Use correct grammar and mechanics. Be sure to support your claims, arguments, and conclusions with credible evidence from 4–5 current, scholarly or professional sources. Proofread your writing.

Self-Assessment Content Analyze your leadership strengths and weaknesses. Identify at least one leadership theory or style that you believe best aligns with your own thoughts of what leadership means. Use that theory or style in your analysis. Cite your sources. Consider potential biases or underlying assumptions in your analysis. Explain how specific leadership characteristics you already possess will enable you to guide, educate, inform, and influence others to manage change in the field of health care. Consider examples of past successes. Consider strategies or best practices that could be applied to improve outcomes. Describe at least two additional leadership characteristics you would like to develop to enhance your effectiveness in this area. Explain how your leadership characteristics will serve to help you build and maintain collaborative relationships across, and within, disciplines. Consider examples of past successes. Consider strategies or best practices that could be applied to improve outcomes. Describe at least two additional leadership characteristics you would like to develop to enhance your effectiveness in this area. Explain how you can best apply the principles of ethical leadership, given your leadership style. Identify the main principles of ethical leadership within your field of practice (nursing, health administration, or public health). Cite your sources. Consider examples of past successes.

Consider strategies or best practices that could be applied to improve outcomes. Where do you have room to grow in this area? How can you prepare yourself to do so? Explain why diversity and inclusion are important to employee relations and the provision of safe, high-quality health care. Provide an example you have experienced or read about. Cite your sources. Explain how your leadership characteristics prepare you to develop and lead a diverse team of employees and serve a diverse community within an ethical framework. In what ways can you address issues of diversity and inclusion, both within an organization and in serving the public? Explain how research skills and critical thinking guide effective decision making and foster integrity in research and professional practice. Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information. Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

FP6016 Assessment 3

Capella FP6016 Assessment 3

Capella FP6016 Assessment 3 Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario. In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care. Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative. Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative. Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health. Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions. Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision. Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care. Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions. Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation

In this assessment, you will base your Patient-Centered Care Report on the scenario presented in the Evidence-Based Health Evaluation and Application media piece. Some of the writing you completed and exported from the media piece should serve as pre-writing for this assessment and inform the final draft of your report. Even though the media piece presented only one type of care setting, you can extrapolate individualized care decisions, based on population health improvement initiative outcomes, to other settings.

Requirements

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant evidence from 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources to support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Attach a reference list to your report. Capella FP6016 Assessment 3

Report Content

Address the following points in a 4–6 page report: Evaluate the expected outcomes of the population health improvement initiative that were, and were not, achieved. Describe the outcomes that were achieved, their positive effects on the community’s health, and any variance across demographic groups. Describe the outcomes that were not achieved, the extent to which they fell short of expectations, and any variance across demographic groups. Identify the factors (for example: institutional, community, environmental, resources, communication) that may have contributed to any achievement shortfalls. Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of the population health improvement initiative, or ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Describe the corrective measures you would take to address the factors that may have contributed to achievement shortfalls. Cite the evidence (from similar projects, research, or professional organization resources) that supports the corrective measures you are proposing. Explain how the evidence illustrates the likelihood of improved outcomes if your proposed strategy is enacted.

Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from the population health improvement initiative outcomes. Explain how the outcomes and lessons learned informed the decisions you made in your approach for personalizing care for the patient with a health condition related to the population health concern addressed in the improvement initiative. Ensure that your approach to personalizing care for the individual patient addresses the patient’s: Individual health needs. Economic and environmental realities. Culture and family. Incorporate the best available evidence (from both the population health improvement initiative and other relevant sources) to inform your approach and actions you intend to take. Justify the value and relevance of evidence you used to support your approach to personalizing care for your patient. Explain why your evidence is valuable and relevant to your patient’s case. Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate for both the health issue you are trying to correct and for the unique situation of your patient and their family. Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of your approach to personalizing patient care. Ensure that your framework includes measurable criteria that are relevant to your desired outcomes. Explain why the criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success. Identify the specific aspects of your approach that are most likely to be transferable to other individual cases.