Week 7 Teen Suicide Health Promotion Program I

Week 7 Teen Suicide Health Promotion Program I

Health Problem is Teen Suicide in SWFL. My health promotion proposal about this topic is attached. Please read it and answer the following question. This week you will devote your time to work on your health promotion proposal. Please share what you consider a challenge for this activity. How did (or would) you approach the challenge? Thanks. Teen Suicide Health Promotion Program I Description of Health Problem Teen suicide is a serious problem adversely affecting families, communities, and governments. According to Busby et al. (2020), suicide is the second leading cause of death in the United States among young people aged 10-24 and 25-34 years. The study established that approximately 9% of high school students have made at least one attempt to commit suicide, whereas 20% had seriously considered taking their lives. In addition, the study estimated the cost of suicide in the United States at $926 billion in loss of productivity, medical costs, and the value of statistical life. Teen suicide could be reduced significantly by integrating a prevention program into the already existing school mental health resources or systems. The Yellow Ribbon Suicide Prevention intervention will be integrated with the mental health programs in Schools to promote help-seeking behaviors. Staff members will implement the “Ask for help” training among teens. The training will last for 30 minutes and will be conducted after every seven days. In addition, teens and teachers will wear a wrist bracelet written: “It is OK to Seek Help.” According to Gallo and Wachter (2022), teens are more likely to share suicidal thoughts with classmates and peers than teachers or adults. The proposed Yellow Ribbon Program (YRP) is designed to encourage and support teens’ help-seeking behaviors. Vulnerable Population The youth are more vulnerable to dying by suicide than adults. In the United States, estimates reveal that about 7% of teens (adolescents) attempt suicide yearly (Vaughn et al., 2020). It was also established that at least one suicide is completed for every 100 suicidal attempts. There is an increased risk for suicide attempts among teens with a history of abuse, family discord, and negative life events; adolescents with substance abuse, general health, and mental health problems; and girls. It is noteworthy that risk factors for suicide among teens seem to be consistent with the bodily developmental changes during adolescence. The risk of suicide among teens may be increased by factors such as distress, irritability, lack of a support network, feelings of hopelessness and struggle with sexuality or gender identity. Adolescence is a time of relationships, the need for independence, and relationships, which conflicts with the expectations and rules set by others. Busby et al. (2020) suggested that mental health systems should address additional objectives, such as supporting healthy youth development. Given the high risk for suicide among the adolescent population, schools are better placed to provide early interventions to address the problem. Evidence-Based Interventions (Literature Review of Articles) One of the teen suicide prevention programs is gatekeeper training, elucidated by an article titled ” Preventing Adolescent Suicide,” authored by Torok et al. (2019). Gatekeeper training allows persons with high contact with teens, such as teachers and parents, to detect early signs of suicidal conduct, tendencies, or behaviors and intervene to prevent injury, disability, or mortality (Torok, Calear, Smart, Nicolopoulos, & Wong, 2019). The article suggests that parents and teachers reported improvements in perceived confidence and knowledge to intervene to prevent teen suicide. From this study, it is apparent that most teachers and parents have considerably low suicide literacy. School counsellors have more knowledge concerning suicide risks among teens and how to intervene, which means that gatekeeper training may have a null effect on this group. According to Gallo and Wachter (2022), gatekeeper training for teaching staff is an effective and safe strategy for increasing awareness of suicide risk among teens and reducing suicidal attempts or deaths in schools. As such, gatekeeper training programs should be reviewed and improved regularly to enhance their efficacy in facilitating suicide prevention. Another evidence-based intervention to prevent suicide among teens in schools is screening and mental health assessment. According to Vaughn et al. (2020), schools may focus screening exercises on selected teens (known to be at risk of suicide) or perform it universally with all teens. In the article by Singer et al. (2020) titled ” School-based Suicide Prevention,” the authors contend that screening for suicide risk factors among teens in schools increases early detection of individuals at risk of committing suicide and enhances timely interventions to improve mental health. The students identified from the screening process as being at risk should be interviewed further to understand their problems and address them appropriately. However, there are no universal screening measures for behavioral health problems or suicide (Singer, Erbacher & Rosen, 2019). Nevertheless, screening encourages help-seeking behaviors’ and improves mental health among teens, ultimately reducing suicidal thoughts. Strengths and Weaknesses of the Articles The two articles reviewed have fundamental strengths and some weaknesses. According to Busby et al. (2020), a robust research methodology is essential for generating authoritative findings. A case in point is the systematic and rigorous analysis of various studies in Torok’s article. The comparative evaluation of more than five studies about gatekeeper training enables the authors to obtain reliable and broad sets of data, leading to valid conclusions. Similarly, the article “school-based suicide prevention” contains significant explanations on the efficacy of screening to detect and prevent teen suicide in schools. The authors highlight different screening approaches used by schools and draw useful conclusions about their efficacy. Despite the strengths, the methodologies used in the two articles lacked the use of validated scales to measure behavioral outcomes of suicide prevention programs. According to Gallo and Wachter (2022), lack of measurement standardization and variance in scientific quality complicate efforts to determine the efficacy of the suicide prevention programs discussed. Nevertheless, the articles highlight important information to support integrating suicide prevention programs with school mental health systems. Theoretical Model (Yellow Ribbon Program of Suicide Prevention) The Yellow Ribbon Program (YRB) will focus on empowering teens through education, awareness, and leadership to prevent suicide. According to Vaughn et al. (2020), integrating youth suicide prevention programs with mental health programs in schools is crucial for encouraging help-seeking behaviors among teens. The YRB program also reduces the stigma associated with suicide, which often discourages adolescents from openly sharing suicidal thoughts with adults or teachers. More specifically, the YRB program entails two components: “Ask for help” and “Be the link.” The component of asking for help will be actualized by implementing an educational program to create awareness and provide teens with knowledge to encourage help-seeking behaviors as individuals or on behalf of peers. Also, the teens will be issued a Yellow Ribbon Card. The card will highlight the three steps of helping oneself and others and an appeal to dial hotline numbers to seek help when faced with suicidal thoughts, stress, anxiety, depression, or behavioral problems. Gallo and Wachter (2022) asserted that teens require quick help, especially by dialing hotlines, before they feel helpless and resort to suicide. Therefore, integrating the YRP with mental health systems in schools will increase the efficacy of preventing suicide among teens. References Busby, D. R., King, C. A., Brent, D., Grupp‐Phelan, J., Gould, M., Page, K., & Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). (2020). Adolescents’ Engagement with Crisis Hotline Risk‐management Services: A Report from the Emergency Department Screen for Teen Suicide Risk (ED‐STARS) Study.  Suicide and Life‐Threatening Behavior,  50(1), 72-82. /orders/onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/sltb.12558 Gallo, L., & Wachter, M, C. A. (2022). Suicide Intervention in Schools: If Not School Counselors, Then Who?  Teaching and Supervision in Counseling,  4(2), 6. /orders/trace.tennessee.edu/tsc/vol4/iss2/6/ Singer, J. B., Erbacher, T. A., & Rosen, P. (2019). School-based suicide prevention: A framework for evidence-based practice.  School Mental Health,  11(1), 54-71. /orders/link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12310-018-9245-8 Torok, M., Calear, A. L., Smart, A., Nicolopoulos, A., & Wong, Q. (2019). Preventing adolescent suicide: A systematic review of the effectiveness and change mechanisms of suicide prevention gatekeeping training programs for teachers and parents.  Journal of adolescence,  73, 100-112. /orders/www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140197119300715 Vaughn, L. M., Sunny, C. E., Lindquist-Grantz, R., King, C., Brent, D., Boyd, S., & Grupp-Phelan, J. (2020). Successful suicide screening in the pediatric emergency department: youth, parent, researcher, and clinician perspectives.  Archives of suicide research,  24(sup1), 124-141. /orders/www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13811118.2018.1541034

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS: ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

• Guarantee

• Zero Plagiarism
• On-time delivery
• A-Grade Papers
• Free Revision
• 24/7 Support
• 100% Confidentiality
• Professional Writers

• Services Offered

• Custom paper writing
• Question and answers
• Essay paper writing
• Editing and proofreading
• Plagiarism removal services
• Multiple answer questions

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper