Week 7 Discussion: Ethical Considerations
Week 7 Discussion: Ethical Considerations
Week 7 Discussion: Ethical Considerations
One of your articles this week was published in 1989 (The Ethical Reasoning Process in Organizational Consulting). For this week’s discussion you are asked to analyze the article by Tannenbaum et al. (1989) and discuss its relevance today based upon the additional readings and resources provided this week. Make an argument for what appear to be the greatest ethical considerations for coaches or managers as coaches within today’s complex organizational settings.
There are two discussions which you need to reply;
Discussion 1
I think most professionals can understand the importance of ethics, and although it has been a topic for decades, it certainly has faced new challenges as time has passed. Although Tannenbaum et al.’s (1989) article is over 30 years old, it still has relevance today. They state that “we cannot teach people how to deal with each and every dilemma” (Tannenbaum et al., 1989) which still holds true as it is nearly impossible to do so. The article goes on to discuss that ethics education is a main way to instill ethics concepts and reasoning into professionals. This “solution” is still used today as business schools require an ethics course and many companies include some form of ethics training for their employees.
Crosbie (2008) provides five tips to incorporate ethics, with three of the five related to education and training.Tannenbaum et al.’s (1989) article also states that their research showed that when standards did not exist, agreement amongst participants on an issue was low as they relied on different reasons to rationalize their decisions. Today, many professions and organizations have a code of ethics which communicates their standards to all their members or employees. And in emerging professions, such as executive coaching, efforts are being made to create a professional code of ethics as the value for standards is being realized (Hannafey et al., 2013).
In today’s ever-changing and complex economy, organizations (and the people who work for them) are trying to be the best at [fill in the blank]. To achieve the desired outcome, people may bend ethics to make it happen. Even with ethics education, training and codes of ethics, people who consider themselves ethical also admit to lying, cheating, and stealing (Crosbie, 2008). People will rationalize their bad behavior to convince themselves that the behavior is (and therefore they are) ethical. This is a challenge for organizations and the coaches working in them.For executive coaches and coaches as managers, ethical issues can certainly arise, such as: “confidentiality questions, potential and actual conflicts of interest, questions about professional standards, success measurement issues, and financial matters” (Hannafey et al., 2013).
Since coaching is about relationships, this involves trust. But when the coaching relationship is with more than just one party (for example, an executive and the organization), the coach has an obligation to both parties and information shared with coach could cause an ethical dilemma. As an example (and admittedly not a good one), if an environmental company hires the coach for an employed executive and that executive shares with the coach that they do not believe in recycling and never do it, the coach may feel that this goes against the company’s ethics. It is not illegal to not recycle, and if the coaching were part of a different company, it would not be an issue, but due to the nature of the company and their ethical standards, this poses a quandary for the coach.
References
Crosbie, R. (2008). Who Defines Ethics In Your Organization? Industrial and Commercial Training. Vol. 40. Issue: 4, pp.181-187, https://doi.org/10.1108/00197850810876226
Hartman, L.P. DesJardins, J. MacDonald, C. (2020). Business Ethics: Decision Making for Personal Integrity & Social Responsibility. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.International Association of Coaching (IAC). (2022). Ethical Principles. IAC. https://certifiedcoach.org/about/ethics/#code
Tannenbaum, S. I., Greene, V. J., Glickman, A. S. (1989). The Ethical Reasoning Process in an Organizational Consulting Situation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. Vol. 20. No 40, pp 229 – 235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.20.4.229
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – Week 7 Discussion: Ethical Considerations
Who we are
Do you handle any type of coursework?
Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.Is it hard to Place an Order?
- 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
- 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Week 7 Discussion: Ethical Considerations
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.
- Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Week 7 Discussion: Ethical Considerations
- Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
- APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
- Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. Week 7 Discussion: Ethical Considerations
- LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
- Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Week 7 Discussion: Ethical Considerations
- Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
- Guarantee
- Zero Plagiarism
- On-time delivery
- A-Grade Papers
- Free Revision
- 24/7 Support
- 100% Confidentiality
- Professional Writers
- Services Offered
- Custom paper writing
- Question and answers
- Essay paper writing
- Editing and proofreading
- Plagiarism removal services
- Multiple answer questions
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Week 7 Discussion: Ethical Considerations
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper