NSG 502: Guidelines for Critique of Quantitative Research

1. Use the following guidelines to critique the research article provided. There is a distinct difference between critiquing and reporting. Make sure you critique and provide the analysis of “why” in your support. Guidelines are adapted from Chapter 18: Gray, J.R., & Grove, S.K. (2021). The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier.

2. Prepare your paper using APA format 7th edition.

3. No abstract is required.

4. Page length should be no more than 4 pages, excluding title and reference pages.

5. This is a formal paper. Follow closely the Grading Rubric for Written Assignment found in the Course Resources section of the course. Be sure to include an Introduction and Conclusion to the assignment. NSG 502: Guidelines for Critique of Quantitative Research

TITLE (3 points)

Does the title represent the focus of the study?

Abstract (3 points)

Does the abstract summarize the purpose of the study and methodology and major study results and findings?

INTRODUCTION

Statement of the Problem (5 points)

Is the problem statement provided? Is it significant? Clear? Congruent with the purpose? Describes the background? Does is contain variables, the population, and setting?

Purpose (3 points)

Clearly stated? Addresses population, setting and variables?

Literature Review (5 points)

References current? Reviews previous studies and theories? Critically appraises and synthesizes the studies? Summarizes what is known and not known?

Conceptual/Theoretical framework (5 points)

Is the framework explicit or implicit? Based on tentative, substantive, or scientific theory? Identify, describe, define and describe relationships among variables or concepts? Presents a conceptual model/diagram? Links variables to concepts on the model/diagram?

Research objectives, questions or hypotheses (5 points)

Provides research objectives, questions or hypotheses? Appropriately worded?

Consistent with framework, purpose, and problem?

Variables (3 points)

Are they clearly defined? Independent, dependent, or research variables? Reflective of the concepts identified in the framework? Is the operational definition congruent with the conceptual definition? Demographic variables identified? Extraneous variables identified and controlled?

METHODOLOGY

Research Design (5 points)

Is the design specific to the study? Examines hypotheses & questions? Logically linked to sampling method? Addresses threats to design validity? Does the framework explain links between variables? If a treatment or intervention is present is it clearly described?

Protection of human subjects addressed? Institutional Review Board process and outcome?

Sample and Setting (5 points)

Sample size? Is it appropriate? Was a power analysis done for sample size? Is size sufficient to avoid a type II error? What sampling method was used specific to probability and non -probability? Inclusion & exclusion criteria described? Reflective of the population? Sample attrition?

Threats to the setting as appropriate to the study described?

Measurement (5 points)

Selected measurements have name and author? Type and level of measurement appropriate? Reliability and validity? Minimized error? Explain instruments used and critique using Table 16-1 (p 371) and p. 438 as a guide.

Data Collection (3 points)

Is the process clearly described? Is it conducted in a consistent manner? Ethical? Any adverse events and were they managed well?

RESULTS

Data Analysis and Findings (15 points)

Are statistical procedures appropriate for the type of data collected? Clearly described? How was missing data explained or problems managed? Do analysis techniques address study purpose? Was there enough power for statistical results? Are results presented in an understandable way? Interpretation logical and consistent with framework? NSG 502: Guidelines for Critique of Quantitative Research

Were appropriate procedures used to describe the sample? List procedures. Was the alpha or level of significance identified? Provide specific results. Were tables appropriate?

DISCUSSION

Interpretation (5 points)

Findings summarized? Answered hypotheses or research questions? Limitations discussed? Did the author tie in the conceptual framework? Was external validity addressed particularly generalizability? Do conclusions fit the results from data analysis? Were findings linked to the framework?

Implications (5 points)

Were implications for nursing practice, education, research or science addressed? Were suggestions made for future research?

EVALUATION

Summarize strengths and weaknesses of the study (5 points)

Explain how the study contributes to nursing knowledge (5 points)

APA, GRAMMAR, SPELLING, CONSTRUCTIVE WRITING (15 points)

Graduate level writing should be concise, clear, and organized. Content should flow from paragraph to paragraph using proper transitions. Correct use of grammar, spelling, and punctuation will assist in this process. All graduate papers must be written using the APA 7th edition.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – NSG 502: Guidelines for Critique of Quantitative Research

Who we are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page. NSG 502: Guidelines for Critique of Quantitative Research
5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NSG 502: Guidelines for Critique of Quantitative Research

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. NSG 502: Guidelines for Critique of Quantitative Research

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. NSG 502: Guidelines for Critique of Quantitative Research

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. NSG 502: Guidelines for Critique of Quantitative Research

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. NSG 502: Guidelines for Critique of Quantitative Research

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. NSG 502: Guidelines for Critique of Quantitative Research

Guarantee

Zero Plagiarism
On-time delivery
A-Grade Papers
Free Revision
24/7 Support
100% Confidentiality
Professional Writers

Services Offered

Custom paper writing
Question and answers
Essay paper writing
Editing and proofreading
Plagiarism removal services
Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

NSG 502: Guidelines for Critique of Quantitative Research