NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 

NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 

NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences):

Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article  Zheng, F., Liu, S., Liu, Y., & Deng, L. (2019). Effects of an outpatient diabetes self-management education on patients with type 2 diabetes in China: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of diabetes research, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1073131 Nassar, C. M., Montero, A., & Magee, M. F. (2019). Inpatient diabetes education in the real world: an overview of guidelines and delivery models. Current diabetes reports, 19(10), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1222-6 Lee, S. K., Shin, D. H., Kim, Y. H., & Lee, K. S. (2019). Effect of diabetes education through pattern management on self-care and self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(18), 3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183323 Chatterjee, S., Davies, M. J., Heller, S., Speight, J., Snoek, F. J., & Khunti, K. (2018). Diabetes structured self-management education programs: a narrative review and current innovations. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 6(2), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30239-5
Article Title and Year Published  Effects of an outpatient diabetes self-management education on patients with type 2 diabetes in China, 2019 Inpatient diabetes education in the real world: an overview of guidelines and delivery models, 2019 Effect of diabetes education through pattern management on self-care and self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, 2019 Diabetes structured self-management education programs, 2018
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)   Is a simple outpatient diabetes self-management education program effective? Do hospitals face challenges in delivering inpatient diabetes education with the increase in readmission and hospitalizations? How does applying customized diabetes management programs through pattern management affect individual self-care behaviors and self-efficacy in patients with type two diabetes mellitus? What improvements have been seen in self-management diabetes education programs during the last two decades?
Purposes/Aim of Study Assessing the effectiveness of a simple outpatient diabetes self-management education program Providing an overview of the current state of inpatient diabetes education using the existing guidelines and education models. Investigating the effect of applying customized diabetes education programs on patients’ self-care behaviors and self-efficacy. Assessing the improvement in self-management diabetes education programs.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)  Single-blinded randomized control study Summary overview of the existing diabetes education models. Nonequivalent control group pretest-protest design Narrative review.
Setting/Sample  60 patients in an outpatients department Xiangya Hospital, Central South University Diabetes-Specialty care models and diabetes-non-specialty care models were reviewed. Type 2 diabetes patients of age 18-70 who visited the hospital between March 2017 and September 2017 Existing self-management diabetes education programs
Methods: Intervention/Instruments  A two-group experimental design was used. Diabetes Education models Summary review pretest-posttest design to test the effects of PM-based diabetes education utilizing CGMS results of patients with diabetes Systematic reviews of diabetes self-management education programs done between 2012 and 2017
Analysis  SDSDA, PAID, FBG, postprandrial2 hblood glucose and HbA1c tests were all performed to evaluate the effects of interventions for both groups before andAfter three months. The existing inpatient diabetes education models were discussed according to their reported outcomes. The effects on self-efficacy and self-care behavior were analyzed using ANOVA. Collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 Analysis of the evidence-based reports of the articles reviewed.
Key Findings  For the control group, Scores of the diabetes self-care activities significantly improved in the intervention group after the intervention. Inpatient diabetes education should provide survival skills for self-management upon discharge until more outpatient education is provided. Positive changes in self-care behavior were observed. Self-care behaviors improved after diabetes education programs. There is an increase in self-empowerment in self–management diabetes education models. There is an integration of psychosocial models in diabetes education.
Recommendations  Diabetes self-management education can improve psychological conditions and glycemic control in T2DM. Both diabetes specialty care models and diabetes non-specialty care models can be used successfully for inpatient diabetes education. Customized diabetes education programs specific to each patient’s characteristics should be developed. Psychosocial issues and communication should be considered in self-management education.
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project  The article provides evidence of the impact of education on patients with type 2 diabetes. The article shows that well-structured education is the basis of patient responsibility and increases patient self-management. The article provides an overview of inpatient patient education. It shows the superiority of structured education to other forms of patient education. It offers alternatives for patient education. The article introduces the importance of education in increasing self-efficacy and self-management. It supports that patient education is the best intervention to improve self-efficacy and self-management because diabetes care is highly dependent on patients’ interventions. The study shows that structured education programs utilizing nursing terminologies are the best interventions to deliver quality education. The standardized terminologies are vital in covering patients’ differences.
Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article  Ghisi, G. L. D. M., Seixas, M. B., Pereira, D. S., Cisneros, L. L., Ezequiel, D. G. A., Aultman, C., Sandison, N., Oh, P., & da Silva, L. P. (2021). Patient education program for Brazilians living with diabetes and prediabetes: findings from a development study. BMC public health, 21(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11300-y Xu, G., Liu, B., Sun, Y., Du, Y., Snetselaar, L. G., Hu, F. B., & Bao, W. (2018). Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among U.S. adults in 2016 and 2017: a population-based study. BMJ, 362. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1497 Rahaman, H. S., Jyotsna, V. P., Sreenivas, V., Krishnan, A., & Tandon, N. (2018). Effectiveness of a patient education module on diabetic foot care in outpatient setting: An open-label randomized controlled study. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 22(1), 74. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_148_17 Galaviz, K. I., Weber, M. B., Straus, A., Haw, J. S., Narayan, K. V., & Ali, M. K. (2018). Global diabetes prevention interventions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the real-world impact on incidence, weight, and glucose. Diabetes Care, 41(7), 1526-1534. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2222
Article Title and Year Published  Patient education program for Brazilians living with diabetes and prediabetes: findings from a development study, 2021 Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among U.S. adults in 2016 and 2017: a population-based study, 2018 Effectiveness of a patient education module on diabetic foot care in outpatient setting: An open-label randomized controlled study. Global diabetes prevention interventions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the real-world impact on incidence, weight, and glucose, 2018
Research Questions (Qualitative)/ Hypothesis (Quantitative)  Can there be a diabetes education program that is specifically applicable to Brazilians living with diabetes? How prevalent is diabetes type 1 and 2 among us adults? How effective is the foot care education module that the team had developed? Can LSM strategies implemented under real-world conditions lower diabetes risk and promote weight loss?
Purposes/Aim of Study Develop a diabetes patient education program applicable to the Brazilian population living with diabetes. Estimating the prevalence of diagnosed cases of diabetes type 1 and 2 in the U.S. general population and the proportion among U.S. adults. Assessing the effectiveness of a foot care education module the authors had developed. The purpose of this study was to synthesize global evidence on the impact of LSM strategies on diabetes incidence and risk factors in one parsimonious model.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)  Narrative of existing diabetes education programs Nationwide, population-based, cross-sectional survey Randomized controlled study Epidemiological study design
Setting/Sample  Both inpatient and outpatient Brazilians living with diabetes. Diabetes patient educators National health interview survey 2016 and 2017. U.S. adults aged 20 and above 165 Adult patients diagnosed with Diabetes type 1 or 2 attending endocrinology from July 2015 to December 2016 PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies published between January 1990 and April 2015.
Methods: Intervention/ Instruments  Review of the development process of diabetes patient education programs. Data was collected through NHIS and standardized questionnaires. Block randomization was used to divide the patients into a control group and an intervention group Meta-analysis was used to obtain evidence of the effects
Analysis  Best practices in diabetes education programs in Brazil and South America were analyzed using systematic reviews. Data were statistically analyzed using survey weights. Randomized control trials were used to analyze the effect of healthcare education on foot care knowledge and behavior in diabetes patients. random-effects meta-analysis techniques were applied to obtain a pooled pre/post mean difference for weight and glucose outcomes among intervention participants
Key Findings  Development phases of a diabetes education program were explained. A program applicable to Brazilian patients was developed. The study provided benchmark estimates on the national prevalence of diagnosed type 1 diabetes (0.5%) and type 2 diabetes (8.5%) among U.S. adults. Among U.S. adults with diagnosed diabetes, type 1 and type 2 diabetes accounted for 5.6% and 91.2%, respectively. The module was effective. Persistent change in foot care behavior requires the patient to have reinforcement regularly. The study found that participants receiving an intervention had a 29% lower risk of developing diabetes, lost 1.5 kg more body weight, and reduced FBG by 0.09 mmol/L more than participants not receiving one.
Recommendations  The program’s effectiveness must be tested in the future as meeting individual needs requires sustained efforts. The study recommends further investigations into the disparities in the prevalence. The study recommends further improvement on the diabetes patient education module. Even though LSM strategies can succeed in diabetes prevention, the study recommends further studies in low-income countries.
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone  The article shows the applicability and importance of education in diabetes care. The article provides evidence of increased self-management and better patient education after diabetes education, hence proving the project’s viability. The article provides data on the real-world prevalence of diabetes. It portrays it as a priority clinical problem. In addition, it recommends specific interventions such as mass awareness and patient education to reduce the diabetes healthcare burden. The article reviews the costs of diabetes. It also examines its interventions and preventability. The article recommends rigorous public sensitization and patient education to prevent diabetes and its complications. The article reviews global diabetes prevention interventions. Diabetes education features as an essential intervention in the prevention and prognosis of

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 

Who we are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication. NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page. NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 

  • GuaranteeNRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions
  • NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. NRS 493 Literature Evaluation Table Example 

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper