NR452 RUA Capstone Course – Capstone Evidence-Based Practice Paper
NR452 RUA Capstone Course Capstone Evidence-Based Paper Guidelines
Purpose
The student previously analyzed their performance on the integrated comprehensive assessments and reflected on areas of opportunity and strategies to promote NCLEX-RN success and transition into practice. The student will now apply the priority concept (topic) to evidence-based professional practice upon which nurses have the ability to resolve or have a positive impact. There is a focus on the healthcare disparities of the individual, as well as ethical and legal implications to professional practice. The student will discuss how an interdisciplinary approach promotes quality improvement for the patient and evidence-based professional practice, driving positive outcomes.
Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO # 1: Synthesize knowledge from sciences, humanities, and nursing in managing the needs of humans as consumers of healthcare in a patient-centered environment. (PO#1)
CO # 2: Integrate communication and relationship skills in teamwork and collaboration functioning effectively with health team members and consumers of care. (PO#3)
CO # 3: Utilize information technology to manage knowledge, mitigate error, and support decision making with health team members and consumers of care. (PO# 8)
CO # 4 Integrate critical thinking, clinical reasoning skills, best current evidence, clinical expertise, and patient/family preferences/values in the implementation of the nursing process. (PO# 4)
CO # 5: Explore the impact of professional standards, legislative issues, ethical principles, and values on professional nursing, using data to monitor outcomes and improve quality and safety. (PO# 5, 6)
Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.
Total points possible: 230 points
Preparing the assignment: Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.
In this paper the student will provide a detailed description of the relationship between the category from the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint, the priority concept (topic) selected based on assessment performance, and professional practice.
1) Write a 4-6 page paper (not including the title page or reference page) using APA format
2) Include the following sections:
a. Introduction- 20 points/8%
· Offer a detailed description of the purpose statement for the paper.
· Identify the priority concept (topic) from the Individual Student Comprehensive Assessment Trends: Longitudinal Performance Table drawn from one (1) of the four (4) main categories of the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint:
· Assurance of a safe and effective care environment
· Health promotion and maintenance of health
· Preservation of the patient population’s psychosocial integrity
· Preservation of the patient population’s physiological integrity
· Provide a detailed description of the relationship between the category from the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint and the priority concept (topic).
b. Importance – 20 points/8%
· Describe the importance of the priority concept (topic) to professional practice.
· Describe the importance of the priority concept (topic) to the health status of a patient population.
· Include the potential negative effect(s) to professional practice if the priority concept (topic) is unresolved.
· Include the potential negative effect(s) to the patient population if the priority concept (topic) is unresolved.
c. Healthcare Disparities, Inequalities, and Interventions- 70 points/28%
· Identify patient populations that may be negatively influenced by the priority concept (topic) if unresolved.
· Identify healthcare resources to support evidence-based professional practice related to the priority concept (topic).
· Summarize potential priority concept (topic) healthcare disparities and inequalities related to diverse populations.
· Propose an evidence-based solution for the priority concept (topic) related to healthcare disparities.
· Identify three (3) evidence-based practice interventions.
· Prioritize the identified evidence-based practice interventions and provide rationale.
· Discuss two (2) patient education considerations related to the priority concept (topic).
d. Legal & Ethical Considerations and Intervention Challenges- 40 points/16%
· Identify at least one (1) ethical and one (1) legal implication for addressing the priority concept (topic) in professional practice.
· Discuss at least one (1) strategy in prevention of an ethical dilemma related to the priority concept (topic) in professional practice.
· Discuss at least one (1) strategy in prevention of legal consequences related to the priority concept (topic) in professional practice.
· Identify one (1) anticipated challenge to the success of preventing the priority concept (topic) in professional practice.
· Identify one (1) anticipated challenge to the success of resolving the priority concept (topic) in professional practice.
e. Participants and Interdisciplinary Approach – 20 points/8%
· Identify all the parties who will be involved in the implementation of the priority concept (topic) interventions.
· Discuss the role of each member in the intervention implementation for the priority concept (topic).
· Identify a minimum of two (2) members of a discipline outside of nursing.
· Discuss the benefit of including the identified interdisciplinary members from disciplines outside nursing to promote evidence-based professional practice.
f. Quality Improvement– 20 points/8%
· Provide at least one (1) benefit in patient outcomes from addressing the priority concept (topic) within the clinical environment.
· Provide at least one (1) benefit to the nursing profession that will result from addressing this priority concept (topic) in clinical professional practice.
· Discuss at least one (1) resource utilized to promote improved patient outcomes in the clinical environment.
· Discuss at least one (1) resource utilized to increase professional nurse knowledge promoting improved clinical professional practice.
g. Conclusion – 20 points/8%
· Provide a thorough recap of the purpose to promote increased evidence-based professional practice knowledge related to the priority concept (topic) deficiency.
· Summarize resources identified to support improved evidence-based professional practice related to the priority concept (topic).
· Include a complete statement describing why addressing the priority concept (topic) matters for patient outcomes and evidence-based professional practice.
h. APA Style and Organization– 20 points/8%
· References are submitted with the paper.
· Uses current APA format and is free of errors.
· Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.
· At least three (3) scholarly, peer-reviewed, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided. Each section should have a cited source to support the information provided.
For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar) visit the APA Citation and Writing page in the online Chamberlain library.
NR452 Capstone Course Capstone Evidence-Based Practice Paper Guidelines
Grading Rubric
Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge within the paper demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.
Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) |
Highest Level of Performance |
High Level of Performance |
Satisfactory Level of Performance |
Unsatisfactory Level of Performance |
Section not present in paper |
Introduction (20 points/8.7%) |
20 points |
16 points |
8 points |
0 points |
|
Required criteria 1. Offer a detailed description of the purpose statement for the paper. 2. Identify the priority concept (topic) from the Individual Student Comprehensive Assessment Trends: Longitudinal Performance Table drawn from one (1) of the four (4) main categories of the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint: a. Assurance of a safe and effective care environment b. Health promotion and maintenance of health c. Preservation of the patient population’s psychosocial integrity d. Preservation of the patient population’s physiological integrity 3. Provide a detailed description of the relationship between the category from the NCLEX-RN examination blueprint and the priority concept (topic). |
Includes all 3 requirements for section.
|
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section. |
No requirements for this section presented. |
|
Importance (20 points/8.7%) |
20 points |
18 points |
16 points |
8 points |
0 points |
Required criteria 1. Describe the importance of the priority concept (topic) to professional practice 2. Describe the importance of the priority concept (topic) to the health status of a patient population. 3. Include the potential negative effect(s) to professional practice if the priority concept (topic) is unresolved. 4. Include the potential negative effect(s) to the patient population if the priority concept (topic) is unresolved. |
Includes all 4 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section. |
No requirements for this section presented. |
Healthcare Disparities, Inequalities, and Interventions (70 points/30.4%) |
70 points |
63 points |
54 points |
21 points |
0 points |
Required criteria 1. Identify patient populations that may be negatively influenced by the priority concept (topic) if unresolved. 2. Identify healthcare resources to support evidence-based practice related to the priority concept (topic). 3. Summarize potential priority concept (topic) healthcare disparities and inequalities related to diverse populations. 4. Propose an evidence-based solution for the priority concept (topic) related to healthcare disparities. 5. Identify three (3) evidence-based practice interventions. 6. Prioritize the identified evidence-based practice interventions and provide rationale. 7. Discuss two (2) patient education considerations related to the priority concept (topic). |
Includes all 7 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 5-6 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 3-4 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 1-2 requirements for section. |
No requirements for this section presented. |
Legal & Ethical Considerations and Intervention Challenges (40 points/17.4%) |
40 points |
36 points |
31 points |
12 points |
0 points |
Required criteria 1. Identify at least one (1) ethical and one (1) legal implication for addressing the priority concept (topic) in professional practice. 2. Discuss at least one (1) strategy in prevention of an ethical dilemma related to the priority concept (topic) in professional practice. 3. Discuss at least one (1) strategy in prevention of legal consequences related to the priority concept (topic) in professional practice. 4. Identify one (1) anticipated challenge to the success of preventing the priority concept (topic) in professional practice. 5. Identify one (1) anticipated challenge to the success of resolving the priority concept (topic) in professional practice. |
Includes all 5 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 1-2 requirements for section. |
No requirements for this section presented. |
Participants and Interdisciplinary Approach (20 points/8.7%) |
20 points |
18 points |
16 points |
8 points |
0 points |
Required criteria 1. Identify all the parties who will be involved in the implementation of the priority concept (topic) interventions. 2. Discuss the role of each member in the intervention implementation for the priority concept (topic). 3. Identify a minimum of two (2) members of a discipline outside of nursing. 4. Discuss the benefit of including the identified interdisciplinary member from disciplines outside nursing to promote evidence-based professional practice.
|
Includes all 4 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section. |
No requirements for this section presented. |
Quality Improvement (20 points/8.7%) |
20 points |
18 points |
16 points |
8 points |
0 points |
Required criteria 1. Provide at least one (1) benefit in patient outcomes from addressing the priority concept (topic) within the clinical environment. 2. Provide at least one (1) benefit to the nursing profession that will result from addressing this priority concept (topic) in clinical professional practice. 3. Discuss at least one (1) resource utilized to promote improved patient outcomes in the clinical environment. 4. Discuss at least one (1) resource utilized to increase professional nurse knowledge promoting improved clinical professional practice. |
Includes all 4 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section. |
No requirements for this section presented. |
Conclusion (20 points/8.7%) |
20 points |
16 points |
8 points |
0 points |
|
Required criteria 1. Provide a thorough recap of the purpose to promote increased evidence-based professional practice knowledge related to the priority concept (topic) deficiency. 2. Summarize resources identified to support improved evidence-based professional practice related to the priority concept (topic). 3. Include a complete statement describing why addressing the priority concept (topic) matters for patient outcomes and evidence-based professional practice. |
Includes all 3 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 1 requirement for section. |
No requirements for this section presented. |
|
APA Format, Grammar, and Punctuation (20 points/8.7%) |
20 points |
18 points |
16 points |
8 points |
0 points |
Required criteria 1. References are submitted with paper. 2. Uses current APA format and is free of errors. 3. Grammar and mechanics are free of errors. 4. At least three (3) scholarly, peer reviewed, primary sources from the last 5 years, excluding the textbook, are provided. Each section should have a cited source to support information provided. 5. Length is 4-6 pages, excluding title and reference pages. |
Includes all 5 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 4 requirements for section. |
Includes no fewer than 3 requirements for section. |
Includes 1-2 requirements for section. |
No requirements for this section presented. |
Total Points Possible = 230 points |
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Who We Are
We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.Do you handle any type of coursework?
Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.Is it hard to Place an Order?
- 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
- 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS: ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.
- Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
- Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
- APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
- Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
- LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
- Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
- Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
- Guarantee
- Zero Plagiarism
- On-time delivery
- A-Grade Papers
- Free Revision
- 24/7 Support
- 100% Confidentiality
- Professional Writers
- Services Offered
- Custom paper writing
- Question and answers
- Essay paper writing
- Editing and proofreading
- Plagiarism removal services
- Multiple answer questions
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper