Posts in category: Nursing Papers

Capella FP5004 Assessment 2

Capella FP5004 Assessment 2 Write an executive report of 4–5 pages that analyzes the role of diversity in an underperforming community program, unit, or department, and outline a plan for providing ongoing training on cultural awareness, inclusion, and sensitivity to current employees. Be sure you read all of the requirements for this assessment and review the suggested resources to see if they may be useful in completing the assessment. This assessment provides an opportunity to determine how you can help advance your professional field by developing a strategy for managing diversity that recognizes the synergy achieved by having a diverse and inclusive workforce. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Explain the concepts, principles, and characteristics of effective health care leadership. Determine the influence of effective leadership on the development of a diverse and culturally competent workforce.

Competency 3: Analyze standards of professional ethics and the principles of diversity and inclusion as applied by health care leaders in real-world situations. Outline a plan to recruit, hire, and retain a diverse workforce. Outline a plan for providing employee training on cultural awareness and sensitivity. Explain the benefits of a diverse and culturally competent workforce to a health care organization and the community it serves. Competency 4: Determine the influence of the practitioner-scholar role on professional practice and leadership development. Explain how the academic and research skills one develops as a practitioner-scholar can be of service in one’s role as a health care leader. Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation

Use the following case study as the basis of this assessment. Imagine you are the manager of a new health care facility satellite office or community outreach center located in a diverse neighborhood. The parent organization opened the facility to address the underserved health care needs of the culturally diverse residents who were not using the services offered at the main facility. The first month of operation saw a very high volume of patients, but since then, the numbers have dropped off drastically. Executive leadership wants to understand why this has happened and what you plan to do about it. After careful examination of all aspects of the facility, and talking with some of the neighborhood residents, you have determined that the residents do not feel comfortable coming to the facility because the staff does not represent the diversity of the neighborhood. Staff members were hired for their skill, but their diversity was not considered. Now, you must report to executive leadership what you have learned and how you intend to manage diversity. Note: Remember, you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of your proposal for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback if you plan on using this free service. Capella FP5004 Assessment 2

Report Requirements

Write an executive report on the need for a diverse, culturally competent staff, including your plans to address that need. Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Managing Diversity scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. You are provided an example report, to illustrate what proficient-level work for this assessment looks like. Report Format and APA Style Use the Executive Report Template, linked in the Resources, to draft your report. You may also organize the content of your report in a format used in your organization. An abstract is not required. Your report should be 4–5 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.

Writing

As you begin composing your report, consider the purpose of the report, the appropriate tone and style, and the expectations of the executive leaders who will be reading it. Be clear and concise in your reporting. Express your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently. Use correct grammar and mechanics. Be sure to support your claims and arguments with credible evidence from 3–5 current, scholarly or professional sources. Proofread your writing.

Report Content Outline a plan to recruit, hire, and retain a more diverse workforce. Note: Your outline should be a high-level overview of a plan, not a detailed plan. Other courses in your program will go into human resource practices and diversity in depth. In drafting your plan, consider the following questions: How does a leader develop a diverse workforce? Where will you look for more diverse employees? Will you post job ads? What will the interviewing and hiring process look like? Who will do the interviewing? Who will make the final decisions? What kind of incentives will you offer diverse employees to retain them? What do you need to know about the culture and values of diverse employees before developing a retention plan? How will you address issues related to diversity that result in conflict? Outline a plan for the ongoing training and professional development of existing staff in cultural awareness and sensitivity. Consider how your plan can: Improve communications and interpersonal skills.

Help overcome bias and resistance to change. Explain the benefits, to both the organization and the community it serves, of having a diverse and culturally competent workforce. Explain the relationship between health care organizations and communities. Explain the role that diversity plays in providing culturally competent care and access for the under-served in a community. Determine the influence of effective leadership on the development of a diverse and culturally competent workforce. Explain the importance of cultural competence for leaders in an organization. Explain how the academic and research skills you develop as a practitioner-scholar can serve you in your role as an effective health care leader. Explain how those skills might contribute to your credibility and effectiveness as a leader. Explain how those skills might prepare you to lead a diverse workforce. Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.

Capella FP5004 Assessment 1

Capella FP5004 Assessment 1 Draft a proposal of 4–5 pages for the development of an interprofessional team to address a problem in delivering safe, high-quality health care. Read each portion of the assessment carefully and see if the suggested resources can help you complete it. Effective interprofessional collaboration is an essential strategy for health care leaders in delivering safe, high-quality health care and reducing costs. The ability to establish effective professional relationships among internal and external resources is the foundation of collaboration (Lawson, 2004). This assessment provides an opportunity to consider the practical value and implementation of a collaborative strategy in your professional practice or area of interest. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Explain the concepts, principles, and characteristics of effective health care leadership. Analyze the factors contributing to a problematic health care issue. Competency 2: Explain the role of health care leaders in facilitating interprofessional collaboration. Explain the need for interprofessional collaboration to improve the quality and safety of health care in specific instances. Assess the effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative relationships. Develop a collaborative plan for improving the quality and safety of health care in specific instances. Determine the leader’s role in implementing collaborative health care improvement projects. Competency 4: Determine the influence of the practitioner-scholar role on professional practice and leadership development. Determine how the practitioner-scholar model might be applied in resolving a particular health care issue. Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. Develop a strategy for communicating the progress of interprofessional teams to organizational leaders. Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Reference Lawson, H. (2004). The logic of collaboration in education and the human services. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(3), 225–237.

Preparation

Health care leaders often find that resolving a problem in delivering safe, high-quality health care requires the combined effort of a number of agencies, departments, and individuals. For this assessment, identify a quality-related situation or problem relevant to your professional practice or area of interest that requires the collaborative effort of several departments and individuals to resolve. You will assume the role of team leader and draft a proposal for the organization’s executive leadership that outlines why this interprofessional team is necessary, who should take part in the collaboration, how the team will function, and how progress will be reported. A project proposal should identify the situation or problem, identify the causes or contributing factors, present a plan of action, provide details about the plan, and provide reasons why the plan should be undertaken. Note: Remember, you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of your proposal for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback if you plan on using this free service. Capella FP5004 Assessment 1

Proposal Requirements

Write a proposal for assembling an interprofessional team. As you begin drafting your proposal, consider your goal and the needs of the leaders whose decisions will be based on the information you provide. Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Interprofessional Collaboration scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. You are provided an example proposal that illustrates what proficient-level work for this assessment looks like. Proposal Format and APA Style Use the simplified Project Proposal Template, linked in the Resources, to draft your proposal. You may organize the content of your proposal in a format used in your organization. An abstract is not required. Your proposal should be 4–6 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.

Writing

Be concise, but thorough. Your readers need sufficient and accurate information on which to base their decisions, and do not have time to sift through information that is not pertinent. Express your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently. Use correct grammar and mechanics. Be sure to support your claims, arguments, and conclusions with credible evidence from 3–5 current, scholarly or professional sources. Proofread your writing.

Plan Content Analyze the factors that have contributed to the problem. ( Hint: Examine the reasons for ineffective communication, not just the communication itself. Reasons may include staff burnout, workload, staffing shortfalls, attitudes, assumptions, and so on.) Consider whether certain combinations of factors might be contributing to the problem. Explain why an interprofessional team is needed to address the problem and achieve expected project outcomes. Determine who should be on the team. Identify the disciplines or areas team members should come from and any specific job titles prospective team members should hold. Describe the knowledge and expertise each discipline has to offer in resolving the situation. In addition, consider the level of creativity and problem-solving skills that are needed. Assess the effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative relationships. Consider how effective that approach is in: Encouraging participation by all team members. Engaging reluctant or resistant team members. Maintaining a respectful platform for members to voice their ideas. Develop a strategy for communicating progress by the team to executive leadership. Determine which approach to communicating with leaders will be most effective and efficient. Determine whether you will have regular meetings and generate status reports.

Develop a collaborative plan for resolving the problem. Identify the ethical or political issues that are relevant factors in your proposed solution. Identify the social, cultural, or economic factors that are relevant to your proposed solution. Explain how you would address the ethical, political, social, cultural, or economic factors you have identified as relevant to your plan. Describe your role as a leader in implementing the proposed solution. Determine how the practitioner-scholarmodel might be applied in resolving the problem. Consider how theory, research, and the published work in the field, in conjunction with your own experience and professional knowledge, might be used to develop strategies to analyze and resolve the problem. Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.

Capella FP6016 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP6016 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP6016 Assessment 1

Write a 5–7-page a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss from your professional nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization. Health care organizations strive for a culture of safety. Yet despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, laws, legislation and regulations, medical errors continue to occur. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. The goal of this assessment is to focus on a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities and to propose a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses. Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance. Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss. Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders. Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss. Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures. Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement. Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care. Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Capella FP6016 Full Course Work 2019

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation Prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near-miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization. Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service. The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your Adverse Event or Near-miss Analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss. Describe how the event resulted from a patient’s medical management rather than from the underlying condition. Identify and evaluate the missed steps or protocol deviations that led to the event. Discuss the extent to which the incident was preventable. Research the impact of the same type of adverse event or near miss in other facilities. Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders. Evaluate both short-term and long-term effects on the stakeholders (patient, family, interprofessional team, facility, community). Analyze how it was managed and who was involved. Analyze the responsibilities and actions of the interprofessional team. Explain what measures should have been taken and identify the responsible parties or roles. Describe any change to process or protocol implemented after the incident. Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. Analyze the quality improvement technologies that were put in place to increase patient safety and prevent a repeat of similar events. Determine whether the technologies are being utilized appropriately. Explore how other institutions integrated solutions to prevent these types of events. Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement. Identify the salient data that is associated with the adverse event or near miss that is generated from the facility’s dashboard. (By dashboard, we mean the data that is generated from the information technology platform that provides integrated operational, financial, clinical, and patient safety data for health care management.) Analyze what the relevant metrics show. Explain research or data related to the adverse event or near miss that is available outside of your institution. Compare internal data to external data. Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss. Explain how the process or protocol is now managed and monitored in your facility. Evaluate how other institutions addressed similar incidents or events. Analyze QI initiatives developed to prevent similar incidents, and explain why they are successful. Provide evidence of their success. Propose solutions for your selected institution that can be implemented to prevent future adverse events or near-miss incidents. Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Submission Requirements Length of submission: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages. Number of references: Cite a minimum of three sources (no older than seven years, unless seminal work) of scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Capella FP6016 Assessment 2

Deliver a 5–7-page analysis of an existing quality improvement initiative at your workplace. The QI initiative you choose to analyze should be related to specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. Too often, discussions about quality health care, care costs, and outcome measures take place in isolation—each group talking among themselves about results and enhancements. Because nurses are critical to the delivery of high-quality, efficient health care, it is essential that they develop the proficiency to review, evaluate performance reports, and be able to effectively communicate outcome measures related to quality initiatives. The nursing staff’s perspective and the need to collaborate on quality care initiatives are fundamental to patient safety and positive institutional health care outcomes. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: FP6016 Full Course

Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance. Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative. Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures. Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting. Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures. Competency 4: Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost effectiveness, and work-life quality Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes. Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care. Communicate evaluation and analysis in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

Preparation You have been asked to prepare and deliver an analysis of an existing quality improvement initiative at your workplace. The QI initiative you choose to analyze should be related to a specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. The purpose of the report is to assess whether specific quality indicators point to improved patient safety, quality of care, cost and efficiency goals, and other desired metrics. Your target audience consists of nurses and other health professionals with specializations or interest in your selected condition, disease, or issue. In your report, you will define the disease, analyze how the condition is managed, identify the core performance measurements used to treat or manage the condition, and evaluate the impact of the quality indicators on the health care facility: Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service. The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting. FP6016 Full Course

Evaluate a QI initiative and explain what prompted the implementation. Detail problems that were not addressed and any issues that arose from the initiative. Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures. Analyze the benchmarks that were used to evaluate success. Detail what was the most successful, as well as what outcome measures are missing or could be added. Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes. Integrate the perspectives of interprofessional team members involved in the initiative. Detail who you talked to, their professions, and the impact of their perspectives on your analysis. Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative. Recommend specific process or protocol changes as well as added technologies that would improve quality outcomes. Communicate evaluation and analysis in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Capella FP6016 Full Course Work 2019

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Submission Requirements Length of submission: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages. Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources (no older than seven years, unless seminal work) of scholarly peer reviewed or professional evidence that support your interpretation and analysis. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.

Capella FP6016 Assessment 3

Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario. In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care. Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative. Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative. Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health. Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions. Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision. Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care. Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions. Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Preparation In this assessment, you will base your Patient-Centered Care Report on the scenario presented in the Evidence-Based Health Evaluation and Application media piece. Some of the writing you completed and exported from the media piece should serve as pre-writing for this assessment and inform the final draft of your report. Even though the media piece presented only one type of care setting, you can extrapolate individualized care decisions, based on population health improvement initiative outcomes, to other settings.

Requirements Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant evidence from 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources to support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Attach a reference list to your report. Capella FP6016 Full Course Work 2019

Report Content Address the following points in a 4–6 page report: Evaluate the expected outcomes of the population health improvement initiative that were, and were not, achieved. Describe the outcomes that were achieved, their positive effects on the community’s health, and any variance across demographic groups. Describe the outcomes that were not achieved, the extent to which they fell short of expectations, and any variance across demographic groups. Identify the factors (for example: institutional, community, environmental, resources, communication) that may have contributed to any achievement shortfalls. Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of the population health improvement initiative, or ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Describe the corrective measures you would take to address the factors that may have contributed to achievement shortfalls. Cite the evidence (from similar projects, research, or professional organization resources) that supports the corrective measures you are proposing. Explain how the evidence illustrates the likelihood of improved outcomes if your proposed strategy is enacted Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from the population health improvement initiative outcomes.

Explain how the outcomes and lessons learned informed the decisions you made in your approach for personalizing care for the patient with a health condition related to the population health concern addressed in the improvement initiative. Ensure that your approach to personalizing care for the individual patient addresses the patient’s: Individual health needs. Economic and environmental realities. Culture and family. Incorporate the best available evidence (from both the population health improvement initiative and other relevant sources) to inform your approach and actions you intend to take. Justify the value and relevance of evidence you used to support your approach to personalizing care for your patient. Explain why your evidence is valuable and relevant to your patient’s case. Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate for both the health issue you are trying to correct and for the unique situation of your patient and their family. Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of your approach to personalizing patient care. Ensure that your framework includes measurable criteria that are relevant to your desired outcomes. Explain why the criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success. Identify the specific aspects of your approach that are most likely to be transferable to other individual cases. Capella FP6016 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP6016 Assessment 3

Capella FP6016 Assessment 3 Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario. In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care. Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative. Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative. Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health. Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions. Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision. Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care. Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions. Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation

In this assessment, you will base your Patient-Centered Care Report on the scenario presented in the Evidence-Based Health Evaluation and Application media piece. Some of the writing you completed and exported from the media piece should serve as pre-writing for this assessment and inform the final draft of your report. Even though the media piece presented only one type of care setting, you can extrapolate individualized care decisions, based on population health improvement initiative outcomes, to other settings.

Requirements

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant evidence from 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources to support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Attach a reference list to your report. Capella FP6016 Assessment 3

Report Content

Address the following points in a 4–6 page report: Evaluate the expected outcomes of the population health improvement initiative that were, and were not, achieved. Describe the outcomes that were achieved, their positive effects on the community’s health, and any variance across demographic groups. Describe the outcomes that were not achieved, the extent to which they fell short of expectations, and any variance across demographic groups. Identify the factors (for example: institutional, community, environmental, resources, communication) that may have contributed to any achievement shortfalls. Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of the population health improvement initiative, or ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Describe the corrective measures you would take to address the factors that may have contributed to achievement shortfalls. Cite the evidence (from similar projects, research, or professional organization resources) that supports the corrective measures you are proposing. Explain how the evidence illustrates the likelihood of improved outcomes if your proposed strategy is enacted.

Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from the population health improvement initiative outcomes. Explain how the outcomes and lessons learned informed the decisions you made in your approach for personalizing care for the patient with a health condition related to the population health concern addressed in the improvement initiative. Ensure that your approach to personalizing care for the individual patient addresses the patient’s: Individual health needs. Economic and environmental realities. Culture and family. Incorporate the best available evidence (from both the population health improvement initiative and other relevant sources) to inform your approach and actions you intend to take. Justify the value and relevance of evidence you used to support your approach to personalizing care for your patient. Explain why your evidence is valuable and relevant to your patient’s case. Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate for both the health issue you are trying to correct and for the unique situation of your patient and their family. Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of your approach to personalizing patient care. Ensure that your framework includes measurable criteria that are relevant to your desired outcomes. Explain why the criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success. Identify the specific aspects of your approach that are most likely to be transferable to other individual cases.

Capella FP6016 Assessment 2

Capella FP6016 Assessment 2 Deliver a 5–7-page analysis of an existing quality improvement initiative at your workplace. The QI initiative you choose to analyze should be related to specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. Too often, discussions about quality health care, care costs, and outcome measures take place in isolation—each group talking among themselves about results and enhancements. Because nurses are critical to the delivery of high-quality, efficient health care, it is essential that they develop the proficiency to review, evaluate performance reports, and be able to effectively communicate outcome measures related to quality initiatives. The nursing staff’s perspective and the need to collaborate on quality care initiatives are fundamental to patient safety and positive institutional health care outcomes. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance. Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative. Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.

Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting. Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures. Competency 4: Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost effectiveness, and work-life quality Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes. Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care. Communicate evaluation and analysis in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Capella FP6016 Assessment 2

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation

You have been asked to prepare and deliver an analysis of an existing quality improvement initiative at your workplace. The QI initiative you choose to analyze should be related to a specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. The purpose of the report is to assess whether specific quality indicators point to improved patient safety, quality of care, cost and efficiency goals, and other desired metrics. Your target audience consists of nurses and other health professionals with specializations or interest in your selected condition, disease, or issue. In your report, you will define the disease, analyze how the condition is managed, identify the core performance measurements used to treat or manage the condition, and evaluate the impact of the quality indicators on the health care facility: Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service. The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion.

Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting. Evaluate a QI initiative and explain what prompted the implementation. Detail problems that were not addressed and any issues that arose from the initiative. Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures. Analyze the benchmarks that were used to evaluate success. Detail what was the most successful, as well as what outcome measures are missing or could be added. Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes. Integrate the perspectives of interprofessional team members involved in the initiative. Detail who you talked to, their professions, and the impact of their perspectives on your analysis. Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative. Recommend specific process or protocol changes as well as added technologies that would improve quality outcomes. Communicate evaluation and analysis in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

Submission Requirements

Length of submission: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages. Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources (no older than seven years, unless seminal work) of scholarly peer reviewed or professional evidence that support your interpretation and analysis. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.

Capella FP6016 Assessment 1

Capella FP6016 Assessment 1 Write a 5–7-page a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss from your professional nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization. Health care organizations strive for a culture of safety. Yet despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, laws, legislation and regulations, medical errors continue to occur. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. The goal of this assessment is to focus on a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities and to propose a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses. Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance. Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss. Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders. Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss. Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures. Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement. Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care. Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation

Prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near-miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization. Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service. The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your Adverse Event or Near-miss Analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.

Describe how the event resulted from a patient’s medical management rather than from the underlying condition. Identify and evaluate the missed steps or protocol deviations that led to the event. Discuss the extent to which the incident was preventable. Research the impact of the same type of adverse event or near miss in other facilities. Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders. Evaluate both short-term and long-term effects on the stakeholders (patient, family, interprofessional team, facility, community). Analyze how it was managed and who was involved. Analyze the responsibilities and actions of the interprofessional team. Explain what measures should have been taken and identify the responsible parties or roles. Describe any change to process or protocol implemented after the incident. Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. Analyze the quality improvement technologies that were put in place to increase patient safety and prevent a repeat of similar events. Determine whether the technologies are being utilized appropriately. Explore how other institutions integrated solutions to prevent these types of events. Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement.

Identify the salient data that is associated with the adverse event or near miss that is generated from the facility’s dashboard. (By dashboard, we mean the data that is generated from the information technology platform that provides integrated operational, financial, clinical, and patient safety data for health care management.) Analyze what the relevant metrics show. Explain research or data related to the adverse event or near miss that is available outside of your institution. Compare internal data to external data. Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss. Explain how the process or protocol is now managed and monitored in your facility. Evaluate how other institutions addressed similar incidents or events. Analyze QI initiatives developed to prevent similar incidents, and explain why they are successful. Provide evidence of their success. Propose solutions for your selected institution that can be implemented to prevent future adverse events or near-miss incidents. Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Capella FP6016 Assessment 1

Submission Requirements

Length of submission: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages. Number of references: Cite a minimum of three sources (no older than seven years, unless seminal work) of scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.

Capella FP6011 Assessment 2

Capella FP6011 Assessment 2 Develop a population health improvement plan, based on your evaluation of the best available demographic, environmental, and epidemiological data, that focuses on your diagnosis of a widespread population health issue. Part of effectively engaging in evidence-based practice is the ability to synthesize raw health data with research studies and other relevant information in the literature. This will enable you to develop sound interventions, initiatives, and outcomes to address health concerns that you find in data during the course of your practice. In this assessment, you have an opportunity to evaluate community demographic, environmental, and epidemiological data to diagnose a widespread population health issue, which will be the focus of a health improvement plan that you develop. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health. Evaluate community demographic, epidemiological, and environmental data to diagnose widespread population health issues. Develop an ethical health improvement plan to address a population health issue within a community.

Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions. Propose criteria for evaluating population health improvement plan outcomes. Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision. Justify the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a population health improvement plan. Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions. Develop a strategy for communicating with colleagues and members of the community in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation

Your organization is undertaking a population health improvement initiative focused on one of the pervasive and chronic health concerns in the local community. Examples of health improvement initiatives include nationwide concerns, such as type 2 diabetes, HIV, obesity, and Zika. However, your organization has asked you to determine which widespread health concern should be addressed in a population health improvement plan for the community in which you practice and has entrusted you with gathering and evaluating the relevant data.

Requirements

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Data Evaluation

Evaluate community demographic, epidemiological, and environmental data. Identify the relevant data. Describe the major community health concerns suggested by the data. Explain how environmental factors affect the health of community residents. Health Improvement Plan Develop an ethical health improvement plan that effectively addresses the population health concern that you identified in your evaluation of the relevant data. Base your plan on the best available evidence from a minimum of 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Attach a reference list to your plan. Ensure that your plan meets the cultural and environmental needs of your community and will likely lead to some improvement in the community’s health related to this concern. Consider the environmental realities and challenges that exist in the community. Address potential barriers or misunderstandings related to the various cultures prevalent in the community.

Justify the value and relevance of the evidence you used as the basis of your plan. Explain why the evidence is valuable and relevant to the community health concern you are addressing. Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate and informs the goal of improving the health of the community. Propose relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the outcomes of your plan. Explain why your proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success. Explain how you will communicate with colleagues and members of the community, in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way, with regard to the development and implementation of your plan. Develop a clear communications strategy mindful of the cultural and ethical expectations of colleagues and community members regarding data privacy. Ensure that your strategy enables you to make complex medical terms and concepts understandable to members of the community, regardless of language, disabilities, or level of education.

Capella FP6011 Assessment 1

Capella FP6011 Assessment 1 Create an evidence-based, patient-centered concept map that illustrates an individualized approach to patient care, based on a patient case file of your choice. Evidence-based practice is a key skill in the toolkit of the master’s-prepared nurse. Its goal is to ensure that health care practitioners are using the best available evidence to ensure that patients are receiving the best care possible (Godshall, M., 2015.). In essence, evidence-based practice is all about ensuring quality care. In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply evidence-based practice and personalized care concepts to ensure quality care and improve the health of a single patient. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care. Analyze the needs of a patient, and those of their family, with regard to how they will influence a patient-centered concept map.

Design an individualized, patient-centered concept map, based upon the best available evidence for treating a patient’s specific health, economic, and cultural needs. Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions. Propose relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the outcomes of a patient-centered concept map. Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision. Justify the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a patient-centered concept map. Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions. Develop a strategy for communicating with patients and their families in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Reference Godshall, M. (2015). Fast facts for evidence-based practice in nursing: Implementing EBP in a nutshell (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company. Preparation You have been presented with a number of patient case files in the Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Care media piece. You reviewed each case, selected one case for further research, and created draft evidence-based concept map to illustrate an approach to individualized care for the patient. In this assessment, you will build upon and refine your draft concept map and develop a supporting narrative.

Create your concept map and narrative as separate documents. Be sure to note the areas where you need to include your evidence-based support and where you need to make clear your strategies for communicating information to the patient and the patient’s family. Note: Many organizations use the spider style of concept maps (see the Taylor & Littleton-Kearney article for an example). Also, if a specific style of concept map is used in your current care setting, you may use it in this assessment. Create your concept map and narrative as separate documents. Be sure to note the areas where you need to include your evidence-based support and where you need to make clear your strategies for communicating information to the patient and the patient’s family. Capella FP6011 Assessment 1

Requirements

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Supporting Evidence and APA Style Integrate relevant evidence from 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources to support your assertions. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Attach a reference list to your narrative.

Concept Map Develop a concept map for the individual patient, based upon the best available evidence for treating your patient’s health, economic, and cultural needs.

Narrative Develop a narrative (2–4 pages) for your concept map. Analyze the needs of your patient and their family, and determine how those needs will influence a patient-centered concept map. Consider how your patient’s economic situation and relevant environmental factors may have contributed to your patient’s current condition or affect their future health. Consider how your patient’s culture or family should influence your concept map. Justify the value and relevance of the evidence you used as the basis of your concept map. Explain why your evidence is valuable and relevant to your patient’s case. Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate for both the health issue you are trying to correct and for the unique situation of your patient and their family.

Propose relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the degree to which the desired outcomes of your concept map were achieved. Explain why your proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success. Explain how you will communicate specific aspects of the concept map to your patient and their family in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Ensure that your strategies: Promote honest communications. Facilitate sharing only the information you are required and permitted to share. Are mindful of your patient’s culture. Enable you to make complex medical terms and concepts understandable to your patient and their family, regardless of language, disabilities, or level of education.

Additional Requirements Be sure to include both documents when you submit your assessment.

Capella FPX4000 Assessment 1

Capella FPX4000 Assessment 1

Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles. Describe the issues and a possible solution in a 3-5-page paper.

Introduction

Whether you are a nurse, a public health professional, a health care administrator, or in another role in the health care field, you must base your decisions on a set of ethical principles and values. Your decisions must be fair, equitable, and defensible. Each discipline has established a professional code of ethics to guide ethical behavior. In this assessment, you will practice working through an ethical dilemma as described in a case study. Your practice will help you develop a method for formulating ethical decisions.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care.

Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.

Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care.
Summarize the facts in a case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.

Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.
Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.

Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.
Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, and that is consistent with expectations for health care professionals.
Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Write following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references. Capella FPX4000 Assessment 1

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Instructions

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

For this assessment, you will develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your assessment:

Access the Ethical Case Studies | Transcript media piece to review the case studies you may use for this assessment.

Select the case most closely related to your area of interest and use it to complete the assessment.

Note: The case study may not supply all of the information you need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make.

Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.
Access the Ethical Decision-Making Model | Transcript media piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues.

Analyze the factors that contributed to the problem or issue.

Identify who is involved or affected by the problem or issue.

Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.
In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation.

Cite and apply the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the case.
Assess the credibility of the information source.

Assess the relevance of the information source.

Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in the case study.
Describe how the health care professional communicated with others.
Describe the communication and communication strategies that were applied, both in creating and in resolving the problems or issues presented.

Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.
Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by the professional related to any problems or issues involving ethical practice in the case.

Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or challenge presented in the case study.
Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.

Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals.
Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to the proposed problem or issue from the case study.
Describe the proposed solution.

Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization.

Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.
Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.
Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.

Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.
Apply the principles of effective composition.
Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

Assessment 1 Example [PDF]. Capella FPX4000 Assessment 1

Additional Requirements

Length: At least 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
APA Template: Use the APA Style Paper Template [DOCX] as the paper format and use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.

Written communication: Use correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least two references (the case study and an academic peer-reviewed journal article) and three in-text citations within the paper.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.

Note: Read the Applying Ethical Principles Scoring Guide to fully understand how your paper will be graded.

If you would like assistance in organizing your assessment, or if you simply have a question about your assessment, do not hesitate to ask faculty or the teaching assistants in the NHS Learner Success Lab for guidance and suggestions.

Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.

Capella FPX4000 Assessment 3

Capella FPX4000 Assessment 3 Write a 4-6-page analysis of a current problem or issue in health care, including a proposed solution and possible ethical implications.

Introduction In your health care career you will be confronted with many problems that demand a solution. By using research skills you can learn what others are doing and saying about similar problems. Then you can analyze the problem and the people and systems it affects. You can examine potential solutions and their ramifications. This assessment allows you to practice this approach with a real world problem. Capella FPX4000 Assessment 3

Demonstration of Proficiency By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care. Use scholarly information to describe and explain a health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it. Competency 2: Apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of health care. Analyze a health care problem or issue by describing the context, explaining why it is important, and identifying populations affected by it. Discuss potential solutions for a health care problem or issue and describe what would be required to implement a solution. Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care. Analyze the ethical implications if a potential solution to a health care problem or issue was implemented. Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, and that is consistent with expectations for health care professionals. Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Write following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.

Instructions Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Describe the health care problem or issue you selected for use in Assessment 2 (from the Assessment Topic Areas | Transcript media piece) and provide details about it. To explore your chosen topic, you should use the first four steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking. This approach was introduced in the second assessment. Identify possible causes for the problem or issue. Use scholarly information to explain the health care problem or issue. Identify at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic. You may use articles you found while working on Assessment 2 or you may search the Capella Library for other articles. You may find the applicable Undergraduate Library Research Guide helpful in your search. Assess the credibility of the information sources. Assess the relevance of the information sources.

Analyze the problem or issue. Describe the setting or context for the problems or issues. Describe why the problem or issue is important to you. Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue. Discuss potential solutions for the problem or issue. Compare your opinion with other opinions you find in sources from the Capella Library. Provide the pros and cons for one of the solutions you are proposing. Analyze the ethical implications if the potential solution (the one for which you provide pros and cons) were to be implemented. Discuss the pros and cons of implementing the proposed solution from an ethical principle point of view. Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making. Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution. Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like: Assessment 3 Example [PDF]. Capella FPX4000 Assessment 3

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Additional Requirements Length: At least 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. APA Template: Use the APA Style Paper Template [DOCX] as the paper format and the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOC] for guidance. Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Using outside sources: Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style. References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least three scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper. APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citations of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.

Organize your paper using the following structure and headings: Title page. A separate page. Introduction. A brief one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper. Elements of the problem/issue. Identify the elements of the problem or issue or question. Analysis. Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue. Considering options. Consider solutions, responses, or answers. Solution. Choose a solution, response, or answer. Ethical implications. Ethical implications of implementing the solution. Implementation. Implementation of the potential solution. Conclusion. One paragraph. Note: Read the Analyze a Current Health Care Problem or Issue Scoring Guide to fully understand how your paper will be graded. If you would like assistance in organizing your assessment, or if you simply have a question about your assessment, do not hesitate to ask faculty or the teaching assistants in the NHS Learner Success Lab for guidance and suggestions. Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.