Benchmark- Capstone Change Project Objectives Solved

Benchmark- Capstone Change Project Objectives

Benchmark- Capstone Change Project Objectives

Student’s Name

Grand Canyon University

Professor’s Name

April 28, 2023

Topic: Encourage the use of a collaborative care model to reduce poly-pharmacy in the elderly community

Introduction

            As the old populace in the US keeps on developing, the issue of poly-drug store has become progressively pervasive. The individual’s use of multiple medications, or poly-pharmacy, can have a number of negative effects on an elderly person’s health. The collaborative care model offers a solution, whereas traditional care models may exacerbate the issue.

            In exploring the issue of poly-drug store in the older local area and the social evaluation, it was clear that a cooperative consideration model would be useful in resolving this issue. The cultural assessment revealed that the elderly population values family-centered care and respect for their autonomy. By ensuring that patients are included in the decision-making process and that all healthcare providers collaborate to provide the best possible care, a collaborative care model is in line with these values (Meulenbroeks et al., 2021). The elderly population can receive streamlined, coordinated care thanks to this intervention, which reduces polypharmacy and improves health outcomes.

            In order to achieve the goal of implementing a collaborative care model aimed at reducing poly-pharmacy in the elderly population, the following objectives will guide the intervention:

1) Develop an interdisciplinary team to coordinate care and monitor medication use.

            Rationale: Fostering an interdisciplinary group to organize care and screen medicine use is significant to the progress of this intercession. The group ought to comprise of doctors, attendants, drug specialists, and some other medical services suppliers associated with the patient’s consideration (Liu et al., 2019). They can ensure that patients are receiving the appropriate medications, avoid medication duplication, and avoid dangerous drug interactions by working together.

2) Establish a medication review process to ensure appropriate prescribing and deprescribing.

            Rationale: In order to move forward with the goal of establishing a process for reviewing medications, it is essential to ensure that appropriate prescribing and deprescribing take place to lessen the likelihood of polypharmacy. The drug survey cycle ought to incorporate an intensive assessment of all prescriptions recommended to the patient and their viability (Liu et al., 2019). This process can identify any unnecessary medications along with any adverse effects present, leading to appropriate deprescribing.

3) provide patient and family education on medication management and adherence.

            Rationale: This objective is essential component of the proposed intervention aimed at addressing poly-pharmacy in the elderly community (Meulenbroeks et al., 2021). By giving training to patients and their families taking drugs the board, they can become dynamic members in their own consideration and be more liable for their medicine adherence.

            Providing a collaborative care model that aims at reducing poly-pharmacy in elderly individuals demonstrates a proactive approach to patient care, which is a cornerstone of autonomy (Meulenbroeks et al., 2021). To advance independence and civil rights, laying out a medical care framework that puts patients first, particularly as to drug management is vital. Patients can have sureness that they are getting the medicines that are both most appropriate for them and most operative when a cooperative care model is put into place that inspires the participation of all healthcare workers, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and social workers. Patients and their relatives can also better accomplish their own health by getting education on capsule devotion and organization, resultant in better outcomes and a sense of enablement. In the end, this interference has the potential to address issues related with polypharmacy in a variety of populaces in a way that advances patient-centered care and fairness.

Conclusion

            Addressing elderly polypharmacy through the use of a cooperative care model is an effectual plan for providing reasonable and patient-centered care. Patients can accept inclusive care that confirms proper medicine use by founding an interdisciplinary healthcare team that comprises primary care doctors, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, and other experts. In the end, a collaborative care model that aims to reduce elderly polypharmacy can aid in promoting autonomy and social justice while also improving health outcomes.

References

Liu, X., Ng, D. H. M., Seah, J. W. T., Munro, Y. L., & Wee, S. L. (2019). Update on             interventions to prevent or reduce frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping         review and community translation. Current Geriatrics Reports, 8, 72-86. Retrieved from:     /orders/doi.org/10.1007/s13670-019-0277-1.

Meulenbroeks, I., Epp, J., & Schroeder, L. (2021). The value of caregiver inclusive practices in      geriatric transitions of care: A systematic review. Health Policy, 125(7), 888-898.         Retrieved from: /orders/doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.05.001.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Benchmark- Capstone Change Project Objectives

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

• Guarantee

  

• Zero Plagiarism
• On-time delivery
• A-Grade Papers
• Free Revision
• 24/7 Support
• 100% Confidentiality
• Professional Writers

• Services Offered

• Custom paper writing
• Question and answers
• Essay paper writing
• Editing and proofreading
• Plagiarism removal services
• Multiple answer questions

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper