All posts by : freelance

Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP5004 Assessment 1

Draft a proposal of 4–5 pages for the development of an interprofessional team to address a problem in delivering safe, high-quality health care. Read each portion of the assessment carefully and see if the suggested resources can help you complete it. Effective interprofessional collaboration is an essential strategy for health care leaders in delivering safe, high-quality health care and reducing costs. The ability to establish effective professional relationships among internal and external resources is the foundation of collaboration (Lawson, 2004). This assessment provides an opportunity to consider the practical value and implementation of a collaborative strategy in your professional practice or area of interest. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Explain the concepts, principles, and characteristics of effective health care leadership. Analyze the factors contributing to a problematic health care issue. Competency 2: Explain the role of health care leaders in facilitating interprofessional collaboration. Explain the need for interprofessional collaboration to improve the quality and safety of health care in specific instances. Assess the effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative relationships. Develop a collaborative plan for improving the quality and safety of health care in specific instances. Determine the leader’s role in implementing collaborative health care improvement projects. Competency 4: Determine the influence of the practitioner-scholar role on professional practice and leadership development. Determine how the practitioner-scholar model might be applied in resolving a particular health care issue. Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. Develop a strategy for communicating the progress of interprofessional teams to organizational leaders. Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting. Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

Reference Lawson, H. (2004). The logic of collaboration in education and the human services. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(3), 225–237.

Preparation Health care leaders often find that resolving a problem in delivering safe, high-quality health care requires the combined effort of a number of agencies, departments, and individuals. For this assessment, identify a quality-related situation or problem relevant to your professional practice or area of interest that requires the collaborative effort of several departments and individuals to resolve. You will assume the role of team leader and draft a proposal for the organization’s executive leadership that outlines why this interprofessional team is necessary, who should take part in the collaboration, how the team will function, and how progress will be reported. A project proposal should identify the situation or problem, identify the causes or contributing factors, present a plan of action, provide details about the plan, and provide reasons why the plan should be undertaken. Note: Remember, you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of your proposal for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback if you plan on using this free service.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Proposal Requirements Write a proposal for assembling an interprofessional team. As you begin drafting your proposal, consider your goal and the needs of the leaders whose decisions will be based on the information you provide. Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Interprofessional Collaboration scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. You are provided an example proposal that illustrates what proficient-level work for this assessment looks like. Proposal Format and APA Style Use the simplified Project Proposal Template, linked in the Resources, to draft your proposal. You may organize the content of your proposal in a format used in your organization. An abstract is not required. Your proposal should be 4–6 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.

Writing Be concise, but thorough. Your readers need sufficient and accurate information on which to base their decisions, and do not have time to sift through information that is not pertinent. Express your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently. Use correct grammar and mechanics. Be sure to support your claims, arguments, and conclusions with credible evidence from 3–5 current, scholarly or professional sources. Proofread your writing.

Plan Content Analyze the factors that have contributed to the problem. ( Hint: Examine the reasons for ineffective communication, not just the communication itself. Reasons may include staff burnout, workload, staffing shortfalls, attitudes, assumptions, and so on.) Consider whether certain combinations of factors might be contributing to the problem. Explain why an interprofessional team is needed to address the problem and achieve expected project outcomes. Determine who should be on the team. Identify the disciplines or areas team members should come from and any specific job titles prospective team members should hold. Describe the knowledge and expertise each discipline has to offer in resolving the situation. In addition, consider the level of creativity and problem-solving skills that are needed. Assess the effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative relationships.

Consider how effective that approach is in: Encouraging participation by all team members. Engaging reluctant or resistant team members. Maintaining a respectful platform for members to voice their ideas. Develop a strategy for communicating progress by the team to executive leadership. Determine which approach to communicating with leaders will be most effective and efficient. Determine whether you will have regular meetings and generate status reports. Develop a collaborative plan for resolving the problem. Identify the ethical or political issues that are relevant factors in your proposed solution. Identify the social, cultural, or economic factors that are relevant to your proposed solution. Explain how you would address the ethical, political, social, cultural, or economic factors you have identified as relevant to your plan. Describe your role as a leader in implementing the proposed solution. Determine how the practitioner-scholarmodel might be applied in resolving the problem. Consider how theory, research, and the published work in the field, in conjunction with your own experience and professional knowledge, might be used to develop strategies to analyze and resolve the problem. Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information. Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP5004 Assessment 2

Write an executive report of 4–5 pages that analyzes the role of diversity in an underperforming community program, unit, or department, and outline a plan for providing ongoing training on cultural awareness, inclusion, and sensitivity to current employees. Be sure you read all of the requirements for this assessment and review the suggested resources to see if they may be useful in completing the assessment. This assessment provides an opportunity to determine how you can help advance your professional field by developing a strategy for managing diversity that recognizes the synergy achieved by having a diverse and inclusive workforce. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Explain the concepts, principles, and characteristics of effective health care leadership. Determine the influence of effective leadership on the development of a diverse and culturally competent workforce.

Competency 3: Analyze standards of professional ethics and the principles of diversity and inclusion as applied by health care leaders in real-world situations. Outline a plan to recruit, hire, and retain a diverse workforce. Outline a plan for providing employee training on cultural awareness and sensitivity. Explain the benefits of a diverse and culturally competent workforce to a health care organization and the community it serves. Competency 4: Determine the influence of the practitioner-scholar role on professional practice and leadership development. Explain how the academic and research skills one develops as a practitioner-scholar can be of service in one’s role as a health care leader. Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting.

Preparation Use the following case study as the basis of this assessment. Imagine you are the manager of a new health care facility satellite office or community outreach center located in a diverse neighborhood. The parent organization opened the facility to address the underserved health care needs of the culturally diverse residents who were not using the services offered at the main facility. The first month of operation saw a very high volume of patients, but since then, the numbers have dropped off drastically. Executive leadership wants to understand why this has happened and what you plan to do about it. After careful examination of all aspects of the facility, and talking with some of the neighborhood residents, you have determined that the residents do not feel comfortable coming to the facility because the staff does not represent the diversity of the neighborhood. Staff members were hired for their skill, but their diversity was not considered. Now, you must report to executive leadership what you have learned and how you intend to manage diversity. Note: Remember, you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of your proposal for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback if you plan on using this free service.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Report Requirements Write an executive report on the need for a diverse, culturally competent staff, including your plans to address that need. Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Managing Diversity scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. You are provided an example report, to illustrate what proficient-level work for this assessment looks like. Report Format and APA Style Use the Executive Report Template, linked in the Resources, to draft your report. You may also organize the content of your report in a format used in your organization. An abstract is not required. Your report should be 4–5 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.

Writing As you begin composing your report, consider the purpose of the report, the appropriate tone and style, and the expectations of the executive leaders who will be reading it. Be clear and concise in your reporting. Express your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently. Use correct grammar and mechanics. Be sure to support your claims and arguments with credible evidence from 3–5 current, scholarly or professional sources. Proofread your writing. Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

Report Content Outline a plan to recruit, hire, and retain a more diverse workforce. Note: Your outline should be a high-level overview of a plan, not a detailed plan. Other courses in your program will go into human resource practices and diversity in depth. In drafting your plan, consider the following questions: How does a leader develop a diverse workforce? Where will you look for more diverse employees? Will you post job ads? What will the interviewing and hiring process look like? Who will do the interviewing? Who will make the final decisions? What kind of incentives will you offer diverse employees to retain them? What do you need to know about the culture and values of diverse employees before developing a retention plan? How will you address issues related to diversity that result in conflict?

Outline a plan for the ongoing training and professional development of existing staff in cultural awareness and sensitivity. Consider how your plan can: Improve communications and interpersonal skills. Help overcome bias and resistance to change. Explain the benefits, to both the organization and the community it serves, of having a diverse and culturally competent workforce. Explain the relationship between health care organizations and communities. Explain the role that diversity plays in providing culturally competent care and access for the under-served in a community. Determine the influence of effective leadership on the development of a diverse and culturally competent workforce. Explain the importance of cultural competence for leaders in an organization. Explain how the academic and research skills you develop as a practitioner-scholar can serve you in your role as an effective health care leader. Explain how those skills might contribute to your credibility and effectiveness as a leader. Explain how those skills might prepare you to lead a diverse workforce. Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.

Capella FP5004 Assessment 3

Complete a leadership self-assessment of 5–7 pages. Be sure you read all of the requirements for this assessment and review the suggested resources to see if they may be useful in completing the assessment. The health care environment is complex, requiring leadership that is comprehensive and collaborative in the field. It is essential for leaders to be well-versed in a range of areas (practice, research, education) as a means of effective engagement with interprofessional communities. Effective leaders have heightened awareness of self and individual leadership styles, leading to professional growth, career advancement, and the ability to develop leaders for the future across the fields of practice (nursing, health administration, public health). This assessment provides an opportunity to analyze your own leadership qualities to create a portrait of the effective health care professional and leader you aspire to be. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Explain the concepts, principles, and characteristics of effective health care leadership. Analyze one’s leadership strengths and weaknesses, in reference to one or more leadership theories or styles found in the literature. Explain how one’s specific leadership characteristics enable oneself to guide, educate, inform, and influence others in managing change.

Competency 2: Explain the role of health care leaders in facilitating interprofessional collaboration. Explain how one’s specific leadership characteristics help oneself build and maintain interprofessional collaborative relationships. Competency 3: Analyze standards of professional ethics and the principles of diversity and inclusion as applied by health care leaders in real-world situations. Explain how one can best apply the principles of ethical leadership, given one’s leadership style. Explain why diversity and inclusion are important to employee relations and the provision of safe, high-quality health care. Explain how one’s specific leadership characteristics prepare oneself to develop and lead a diverse team of employees and serve a diverse community, within an ethical framework. Competency 4: Determine the influence of the practitioner-scholar role on professional practice and leadership development. Explain how research skills and critical thinking guide effective decision making and foster integrity in research and professional practice. Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting.

Preparation You have been offered the opportunity to apply for a leadership position in your organization. As a part of the application process, your potential employer uses the National Center for Healthcare Leadership (NCHL) competency model of leadership development (NCHL, 2016), which includes a 360-degree evaluation. The evaluation is an assessment that includes anonymous, confidential feedback from those around you, such as your peers, supervisor, direct reports, and stakeholders, as well as a self-assessment on behavior (relational), technical and operational skills, and strategic ability.

As a part of this 360-degree evaluation, you will complete the self-assessment component. This information will be shared with the interview committee for the position, so it is important that you demonstrate your knowledge and experience in each of the areas outlined in the self-assessment requirements below. Note: Remember, you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of your work for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback if you plan on using this free service. Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Reference National Center for Healthcare Leadership. (2016). NCHL organizational assessments. Retrieved from http://www.nchl.org/static.asp?path=2852,3241

Self-Assessment Requirements Complete a leadership self-assessment to create a portrait of the effective health care professional and leader you aspire to be. Note: The assessment requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Leadership Self-Assessment scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. You are provided an example leadership self-assessment to illustrate what proficient-level work for this assessment looks like. Self-Assessment Format and APA Style Use the APA Paper template, linked in the Resources, to draft your self-assessment. An abstract is not required. Your self-assessment should be 5–7 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.

Writing Note: Because this assessment requires you to develop a leadership self-assessment, you may write using first-person voice. However, it is important for your development as a practitioner-scholar to recognize that writing in the first person is not usually acceptable in academic papers, which are written in the third-person. Consequently, you should always carefully consider departing from this norm. Be clear and concise in your writing. Express your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently. Use correct grammar and mechanics. Be sure to support your claims, arguments, and conclusions with credible evidence from 4–5 current, scholarly or professional sources. Proofread your writing.

Self-Assessment Content Analyze your leadership strengths and weaknesses. Identify at least one leadership theory or style that you believe best aligns with your own thoughts of what leadership means. Use that theory or style in your analysis. Cite your sources. Consider potential biases or underlying assumptions in your analysis. Explain how specific leadership characteristics you already possess will enable you to guide, educate, inform, and influence others to manage change in the field of health care. Consider examples of past successes. Consider strategies or best practices that could be applied to improve outcomes. Describe at least two additional leadership characteristics you would like to develop to enhance your effectiveness in this area. Explain how your leadership characteristics will serve to help you build and maintain collaborative relationships across, and within, disciplines. Consider examples of past successes. Consider strategies or best practices that could be applied to improve outcomes. Describe at least two additional leadership characteristics you would like to develop to enhance your effectiveness in this area. Explain how you can best apply the principles of ethical leadership, given your leadership style. Identify the main principles of ethical leadership within your field of practice (nursing, health administration, or public health). Cite your sources. Consider examples of past successes.

Consider strategies or best practices that could be applied to improve outcomes. Where do you have room to grow in this area? How can you prepare yourself to do so? Explain why diversity and inclusion are important to employee relations and the provision of safe, high-quality health care. Provide an example you have experienced or read about. Cite your sources. Explain how your leadership characteristics prepare you to develop and lead a diverse team of employees and serve a diverse community within an ethical framework. In what ways can you address issues of diversity and inclusion, both within an organization and in serving the public? Explain how research skills and critical thinking guide effective decision making and foster integrity in research and professional practice. Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information. Capella FP5004 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP5004 Assessment 3

Capella FP5004 Assessment 3 Complete a leadership self-assessment of 5–7 pages. Be sure you read all of the requirements for this assessment and review the suggested resources to see if they may be useful in completing the assessment. The health care environment is complex, requiring leadership that is comprehensive and collaborative in the field. It is essential for leaders to be well-versed in a range of areas (practice, research, education) as a means of effective engagement with interprofessional communities. Effective leaders have heightened awareness of self and individual leadership styles, leading to professional growth, career advancement, and the ability to develop leaders for the future across the fields of practice (nursing, health administration, public health). This assessment provides an opportunity to analyze your own leadership qualities to create a portrait of the effective health care professional and leader you aspire to be. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Explain the concepts, principles, and characteristics of effective health care leadership. Analyze one’s leadership strengths and weaknesses, in reference to one or more leadership theories or styles found in the literature. Explain how one’s specific leadership characteristics enable oneself to guide, educate, inform, and influence others in managing change. Competency 2: Explain the role of health care leaders in facilitating interprofessional collaboration. Explain how one’s specific leadership characteristics help oneself build and maintain interprofessional collaborative relationships.

Competency 3: Analyze standards of professional ethics and the principles of diversity and inclusion as applied by health care leaders in real-world situations. Explain how one can best apply the principles of ethical leadership, given one’s leadership style. Explain why diversity and inclusion are important to employee relations and the provision of safe, high-quality health care. Explain how one’s specific leadership characteristics prepare oneself to develop and lead a diverse team of employees and serve a diverse community, within an ethical framework. Competency 4: Determine the influence of the practitioner-scholar role on professional practice and leadership development. Explain how research skills and critical thinking guide effective decision making and foster integrity in research and professional practice. Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation

You have been offered the opportunity to apply for a leadership position in your organization. As a part of the application process, your potential employer uses the National Center for Healthcare Leadership (NCHL) competency model of leadership development (NCHL, 2016), which includes a 360-degree evaluation. The evaluation is an assessment that includes anonymous, confidential feedback from those around you, such as your peers, supervisor, direct reports, and stakeholders, as well as a self-assessment on behavior (relational), technical and operational skills, and strategic ability. As a part of this 360-degree evaluation, you will complete the self-assessment component. This information will be shared with the interview committee for the position, so it is important that you demonstrate your knowledge and experience in each of the areas outlined in the self-assessment requirements below. Note: Remember, you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of your work for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback if you plan on using this free service. Capella FP5004 Assessment 3

Reference National Center for Healthcare Leadership. (2016). NCHL organizational assessments. Retrieved from http://www.nchl.org/static.asp?path=2852,3241

Self-Assessment Requirements

Complete a leadership self-assessment to create a portrait of the effective health care professional and leader you aspire to be. Note: The assessment requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Leadership Self-Assessment scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. You are provided an example leadership self-assessment to illustrate what proficient-level work for this assessment looks like. Self-Assessment Format and APA Style Use the APA Paper template, linked in the Resources, to draft your self-assessment. An abstract is not required. Your self-assessment should be 5–7 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.

Writing

Note: Because this assessment requires you to develop a leadership self-assessment, you may write using first-person voice. However, it is important for your development as a practitioner-scholar to recognize that writing in the first person is not usually acceptable in academic papers, which are written in the third-person. Consequently, you should always carefully consider departing from this norm. Be clear and concise in your writing. Express your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently. Use correct grammar and mechanics. Be sure to support your claims, arguments, and conclusions with credible evidence from 4–5 current, scholarly or professional sources. Proofread your writing.

Self-Assessment Content

Analyze your leadership strengths and weaknesses. Identify at least one leadership theory or style that you believe best aligns with your own thoughts of what leadership means. Use that theory or style in your analysis. Cite your sources. Consider potential biases or underlying assumptions in your analysis. Explain how specific leadership characteristics you already possess will enable you to guide, educate, inform, and influence others to manage change in the field of health care. Consider examples of past successes. Consider strategies or best practices that could be applied to improve outcomes. Describe at least two additional leadership characteristics you would like to develop to enhance your effectiveness in this area. Explain how your leadership characteristics will serve to help you build and maintain collaborative relationships across, and within, disciplines.

Consider examples of past successes. Consider strategies or best practices that could be applied to improve outcomes. Describe at least two additional leadership characteristics you would like to develop to enhance your effectiveness in this area. Explain how you can best apply the principles of ethical leadership, given your leadership style. Identify the main principles of ethical leadership within your field of practice (nursing, health administration, or public health). Cite your sources. Consider examples of past successes. Consider strategies or best practices that could be applied to improve outcomes. Where do you have room to grow in this area? How can you prepare yourself to do so? Explain why diversity and inclusion are important to employee relations and the provision of safe, high-quality health care. Provide an example you have experienced or read about. Cite your sources. Explain how your leadership characteristics prepare you to develop and lead a diverse team of employees and serve a diverse community within an ethical framework. In what ways can you address issues of diversity and inclusion, both within an organization and in serving the public? Explain how research skills and critical thinking guide effective decision making and foster integrity in research and professional practice. Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.

Capella FP6016 Assessment 3

Capella FP6016 Assessment 3 Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario. In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care. Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative. Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative. Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health. Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions. Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision. Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care. Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions. Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation

In this assessment, you will base your Patient-Centered Care Report on the scenario presented in the Evidence-Based Health Evaluation and Application media piece. Some of the writing you completed and exported from the media piece should serve as pre-writing for this assessment and inform the final draft of your report. Even though the media piece presented only one type of care setting, you can extrapolate individualized care decisions, based on population health improvement initiative outcomes, to other settings.

Requirements

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant evidence from 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources to support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Attach a reference list to your report. Capella FP6016 Assessment 3

Report Content

Address the following points in a 4–6 page report: Evaluate the expected outcomes of the population health improvement initiative that were, and were not, achieved. Describe the outcomes that were achieved, their positive effects on the community’s health, and any variance across demographic groups. Describe the outcomes that were not achieved, the extent to which they fell short of expectations, and any variance across demographic groups. Identify the factors (for example: institutional, community, environmental, resources, communication) that may have contributed to any achievement shortfalls. Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of the population health improvement initiative, or ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Describe the corrective measures you would take to address the factors that may have contributed to achievement shortfalls. Cite the evidence (from similar projects, research, or professional organization resources) that supports the corrective measures you are proposing. Explain how the evidence illustrates the likelihood of improved outcomes if your proposed strategy is enacted.

Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from the population health improvement initiative outcomes. Explain how the outcomes and lessons learned informed the decisions you made in your approach for personalizing care for the patient with a health condition related to the population health concern addressed in the improvement initiative. Ensure that your approach to personalizing care for the individual patient addresses the patient’s: Individual health needs. Economic and environmental realities. Culture and family. Incorporate the best available evidence (from both the population health improvement initiative and other relevant sources) to inform your approach and actions you intend to take. Justify the value and relevance of evidence you used to support your approach to personalizing care for your patient. Explain why your evidence is valuable and relevant to your patient’s case. Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate for both the health issue you are trying to correct and for the unique situation of your patient and their family. Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of your approach to personalizing patient care. Ensure that your framework includes measurable criteria that are relevant to your desired outcomes. Explain why the criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success. Identify the specific aspects of your approach that are most likely to be transferable to other individual cases.

Capella FP5004 Assessment 2

Capella FP5004 Assessment 2 Write an executive report of 4–5 pages that analyzes the role of diversity in an underperforming community program, unit, or department, and outline a plan for providing ongoing training on cultural awareness, inclusion, and sensitivity to current employees. Be sure you read all of the requirements for this assessment and review the suggested resources to see if they may be useful in completing the assessment. This assessment provides an opportunity to determine how you can help advance your professional field by developing a strategy for managing diversity that recognizes the synergy achieved by having a diverse and inclusive workforce. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Explain the concepts, principles, and characteristics of effective health care leadership. Determine the influence of effective leadership on the development of a diverse and culturally competent workforce.

Competency 3: Analyze standards of professional ethics and the principles of diversity and inclusion as applied by health care leaders in real-world situations. Outline a plan to recruit, hire, and retain a diverse workforce. Outline a plan for providing employee training on cultural awareness and sensitivity. Explain the benefits of a diverse and culturally competent workforce to a health care organization and the community it serves. Competency 4: Determine the influence of the practitioner-scholar role on professional practice and leadership development. Explain how the academic and research skills one develops as a practitioner-scholar can be of service in one’s role as a health care leader. Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation

Use the following case study as the basis of this assessment. Imagine you are the manager of a new health care facility satellite office or community outreach center located in a diverse neighborhood. The parent organization opened the facility to address the underserved health care needs of the culturally diverse residents who were not using the services offered at the main facility. The first month of operation saw a very high volume of patients, but since then, the numbers have dropped off drastically. Executive leadership wants to understand why this has happened and what you plan to do about it. After careful examination of all aspects of the facility, and talking with some of the neighborhood residents, you have determined that the residents do not feel comfortable coming to the facility because the staff does not represent the diversity of the neighborhood. Staff members were hired for their skill, but their diversity was not considered. Now, you must report to executive leadership what you have learned and how you intend to manage diversity. Note: Remember, you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of your proposal for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback if you plan on using this free service. Capella FP5004 Assessment 2

Report Requirements

Write an executive report on the need for a diverse, culturally competent staff, including your plans to address that need. Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Managing Diversity scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. You are provided an example report, to illustrate what proficient-level work for this assessment looks like. Report Format and APA Style Use the Executive Report Template, linked in the Resources, to draft your report. You may also organize the content of your report in a format used in your organization. An abstract is not required. Your report should be 4–5 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.

Writing

As you begin composing your report, consider the purpose of the report, the appropriate tone and style, and the expectations of the executive leaders who will be reading it. Be clear and concise in your reporting. Express your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently. Use correct grammar and mechanics. Be sure to support your claims and arguments with credible evidence from 3–5 current, scholarly or professional sources. Proofread your writing.

Report Content Outline a plan to recruit, hire, and retain a more diverse workforce. Note: Your outline should be a high-level overview of a plan, not a detailed plan. Other courses in your program will go into human resource practices and diversity in depth. In drafting your plan, consider the following questions: How does a leader develop a diverse workforce? Where will you look for more diverse employees? Will you post job ads? What will the interviewing and hiring process look like? Who will do the interviewing? Who will make the final decisions? What kind of incentives will you offer diverse employees to retain them? What do you need to know about the culture and values of diverse employees before developing a retention plan? How will you address issues related to diversity that result in conflict? Outline a plan for the ongoing training and professional development of existing staff in cultural awareness and sensitivity. Consider how your plan can: Improve communications and interpersonal skills.

Help overcome bias and resistance to change. Explain the benefits, to both the organization and the community it serves, of having a diverse and culturally competent workforce. Explain the relationship between health care organizations and communities. Explain the role that diversity plays in providing culturally competent care and access for the under-served in a community. Determine the influence of effective leadership on the development of a diverse and culturally competent workforce. Explain the importance of cultural competence for leaders in an organization. Explain how the academic and research skills you develop as a practitioner-scholar can serve you in your role as an effective health care leader. Explain how those skills might contribute to your credibility and effectiveness as a leader. Explain how those skills might prepare you to lead a diverse workforce. Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.

Capella FP5004 Assessment 1

Capella FP5004 Assessment 1 Draft a proposal of 4–5 pages for the development of an interprofessional team to address a problem in delivering safe, high-quality health care. Read each portion of the assessment carefully and see if the suggested resources can help you complete it. Effective interprofessional collaboration is an essential strategy for health care leaders in delivering safe, high-quality health care and reducing costs. The ability to establish effective professional relationships among internal and external resources is the foundation of collaboration (Lawson, 2004). This assessment provides an opportunity to consider the practical value and implementation of a collaborative strategy in your professional practice or area of interest. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Explain the concepts, principles, and characteristics of effective health care leadership. Analyze the factors contributing to a problematic health care issue. Competency 2: Explain the role of health care leaders in facilitating interprofessional collaboration. Explain the need for interprofessional collaboration to improve the quality and safety of health care in specific instances. Assess the effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative relationships. Develop a collaborative plan for improving the quality and safety of health care in specific instances. Determine the leader’s role in implementing collaborative health care improvement projects. Competency 4: Determine the influence of the practitioner-scholar role on professional practice and leadership development. Determine how the practitioner-scholar model might be applied in resolving a particular health care issue. Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards. Develop a strategy for communicating the progress of interprofessional teams to organizational leaders. Write coherently to support a central idea, using correct grammar, mechanics, and APA formatting.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Reference Lawson, H. (2004). The logic of collaboration in education and the human services. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(3), 225–237.

Preparation

Health care leaders often find that resolving a problem in delivering safe, high-quality health care requires the combined effort of a number of agencies, departments, and individuals. For this assessment, identify a quality-related situation or problem relevant to your professional practice or area of interest that requires the collaborative effort of several departments and individuals to resolve. You will assume the role of team leader and draft a proposal for the organization’s executive leadership that outlines why this interprofessional team is necessary, who should take part in the collaboration, how the team will function, and how progress will be reported. A project proposal should identify the situation or problem, identify the causes or contributing factors, present a plan of action, provide details about the plan, and provide reasons why the plan should be undertaken. Note: Remember, you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of your proposal for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback if you plan on using this free service. Capella FP5004 Assessment 1

Proposal Requirements

Write a proposal for assembling an interprofessional team. As you begin drafting your proposal, consider your goal and the needs of the leaders whose decisions will be based on the information you provide. Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Interprofessional Collaboration scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. You are provided an example proposal that illustrates what proficient-level work for this assessment looks like. Proposal Format and APA Style Use the simplified Project Proposal Template, linked in the Resources, to draft your proposal. You may organize the content of your proposal in a format used in your organization. An abstract is not required. Your proposal should be 4–6 double-spaced pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.

Writing

Be concise, but thorough. Your readers need sufficient and accurate information on which to base their decisions, and do not have time to sift through information that is not pertinent. Express your main points, arguments, and conclusions coherently. Use correct grammar and mechanics. Be sure to support your claims, arguments, and conclusions with credible evidence from 3–5 current, scholarly or professional sources. Proofread your writing.

Plan Content Analyze the factors that have contributed to the problem. ( Hint: Examine the reasons for ineffective communication, not just the communication itself. Reasons may include staff burnout, workload, staffing shortfalls, attitudes, assumptions, and so on.) Consider whether certain combinations of factors might be contributing to the problem. Explain why an interprofessional team is needed to address the problem and achieve expected project outcomes. Determine who should be on the team. Identify the disciplines or areas team members should come from and any specific job titles prospective team members should hold. Describe the knowledge and expertise each discipline has to offer in resolving the situation. In addition, consider the level of creativity and problem-solving skills that are needed. Assess the effectiveness of a particular leadership approach in building and maintaining interprofessional collaborative relationships. Consider how effective that approach is in: Encouraging participation by all team members. Engaging reluctant or resistant team members. Maintaining a respectful platform for members to voice their ideas. Develop a strategy for communicating progress by the team to executive leadership. Determine which approach to communicating with leaders will be most effective and efficient. Determine whether you will have regular meetings and generate status reports.

Develop a collaborative plan for resolving the problem. Identify the ethical or political issues that are relevant factors in your proposed solution. Identify the social, cultural, or economic factors that are relevant to your proposed solution. Explain how you would address the ethical, political, social, cultural, or economic factors you have identified as relevant to your plan. Describe your role as a leader in implementing the proposed solution. Determine how the practitioner-scholarmodel might be applied in resolving the problem. Consider how theory, research, and the published work in the field, in conjunction with your own experience and professional knowledge, might be used to develop strategies to analyze and resolve the problem. Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.

Capella FP6016 Assessment 1

Capella FP6016 Assessment 1 Write a 5–7-page a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss from your professional nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization. Health care organizations strive for a culture of safety. Yet despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, laws, legislation and regulations, medical errors continue to occur. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. The goal of this assessment is to focus on a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities and to propose a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses. Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance. Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss. Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders. Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss. Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures. Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement. Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care. Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation

Prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near-miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization. Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service. The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your Adverse Event or Near-miss Analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss.

Describe how the event resulted from a patient’s medical management rather than from the underlying condition. Identify and evaluate the missed steps or protocol deviations that led to the event. Discuss the extent to which the incident was preventable. Research the impact of the same type of adverse event or near miss in other facilities. Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders. Evaluate both short-term and long-term effects on the stakeholders (patient, family, interprofessional team, facility, community). Analyze how it was managed and who was involved. Analyze the responsibilities and actions of the interprofessional team. Explain what measures should have been taken and identify the responsible parties or roles. Describe any change to process or protocol implemented after the incident. Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. Analyze the quality improvement technologies that were put in place to increase patient safety and prevent a repeat of similar events. Determine whether the technologies are being utilized appropriately. Explore how other institutions integrated solutions to prevent these types of events. Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement.

Identify the salient data that is associated with the adverse event or near miss that is generated from the facility’s dashboard. (By dashboard, we mean the data that is generated from the information technology platform that provides integrated operational, financial, clinical, and patient safety data for health care management.) Analyze what the relevant metrics show. Explain research or data related to the adverse event or near miss that is available outside of your institution. Compare internal data to external data. Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss. Explain how the process or protocol is now managed and monitored in your facility. Evaluate how other institutions addressed similar incidents or events. Analyze QI initiatives developed to prevent similar incidents, and explain why they are successful. Provide evidence of their success. Propose solutions for your selected institution that can be implemented to prevent future adverse events or near-miss incidents. Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Capella FP6016 Assessment 1

Submission Requirements

Length of submission: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages. Number of references: Cite a minimum of three sources (no older than seven years, unless seminal work) of scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.

Capella FP6016 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP6016 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP6016 Assessment 1

Write a 5–7-page a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near miss from your professional nursing experience. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a quality improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization. Health care organizations strive for a culture of safety. Yet despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, laws, legislation and regulations, medical errors continue to occur. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. The goal of this assessment is to focus on a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities and to propose a quality improvement initiative to prevent future incidents. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses. Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance. Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss. Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders. Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss. Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures. Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement. Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care. Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Capella FP6016 Full Course Work 2019

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation Prepare a comprehensive analysis on an adverse event or near-miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Integrate research and data on the event and use as a basis to propose a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative in your current organization. Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service. The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your Adverse Event or Near-miss Analysis addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. Analyze the missed steps or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or near miss. Describe how the event resulted from a patient’s medical management rather than from the underlying condition. Identify and evaluate the missed steps or protocol deviations that led to the event. Discuss the extent to which the incident was preventable. Research the impact of the same type of adverse event or near miss in other facilities. Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders. Evaluate both short-term and long-term effects on the stakeholders (patient, family, interprofessional team, facility, community). Analyze how it was managed and who was involved. Analyze the responsibilities and actions of the interprofessional team. Explain what measures should have been taken and identify the responsible parties or roles. Describe any change to process or protocol implemented after the incident. Evaluate quality improvement technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety. Analyze the quality improvement technologies that were put in place to increase patient safety and prevent a repeat of similar events. Determine whether the technologies are being utilized appropriately. Explore how other institutions integrated solutions to prevent these types of events. Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss incident to support need for improvement. Identify the salient data that is associated with the adverse event or near miss that is generated from the facility’s dashboard. (By dashboard, we mean the data that is generated from the information technology platform that provides integrated operational, financial, clinical, and patient safety data for health care management.) Analyze what the relevant metrics show. Explain research or data related to the adverse event or near miss that is available outside of your institution. Compare internal data to external data. Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss. Explain how the process or protocol is now managed and monitored in your facility. Evaluate how other institutions addressed similar incidents or events. Analyze QI initiatives developed to prevent similar incidents, and explain why they are successful. Provide evidence of their success. Propose solutions for your selected institution that can be implemented to prevent future adverse events or near-miss incidents. Communicate analysis and proposed initiative in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Submission Requirements Length of submission: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages. Number of references: Cite a minimum of three sources (no older than seven years, unless seminal work) of scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Capella FP6016 Assessment 2

Deliver a 5–7-page analysis of an existing quality improvement initiative at your workplace. The QI initiative you choose to analyze should be related to specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. Too often, discussions about quality health care, care costs, and outcome measures take place in isolation—each group talking among themselves about results and enhancements. Because nurses are critical to the delivery of high-quality, efficient health care, it is essential that they develop the proficiency to review, evaluate performance reports, and be able to effectively communicate outcome measures related to quality initiatives. The nursing staff’s perspective and the need to collaborate on quality care initiatives are fundamental to patient safety and positive institutional health care outcomes. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: FP6016 Full Course

Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance. Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative. Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures. Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting. Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures. Competency 4: Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost effectiveness, and work-life quality Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes. Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care. Communicate evaluation and analysis in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

Preparation You have been asked to prepare and deliver an analysis of an existing quality improvement initiative at your workplace. The QI initiative you choose to analyze should be related to a specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. The purpose of the report is to assess whether specific quality indicators point to improved patient safety, quality of care, cost and efficiency goals, and other desired metrics. Your target audience consists of nurses and other health professionals with specializations or interest in your selected condition, disease, or issue. In your report, you will define the disease, analyze how the condition is managed, identify the core performance measurements used to treat or manage the condition, and evaluate the impact of the quality indicators on the health care facility: Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service. The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting. FP6016 Full Course

Evaluate a QI initiative and explain what prompted the implementation. Detail problems that were not addressed and any issues that arose from the initiative. Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures. Analyze the benchmarks that were used to evaluate success. Detail what was the most successful, as well as what outcome measures are missing or could be added. Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes. Integrate the perspectives of interprofessional team members involved in the initiative. Detail who you talked to, their professions, and the impact of their perspectives on your analysis. Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative. Recommend specific process or protocol changes as well as added technologies that would improve quality outcomes. Communicate evaluation and analysis in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Capella FP6016 Full Course Work 2019

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Submission Requirements Length of submission: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages. Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources (no older than seven years, unless seminal work) of scholarly peer reviewed or professional evidence that support your interpretation and analysis. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.

Capella FP6016 Assessment 3

Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario. In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care. Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative. Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative. Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health. Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions. Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision. Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care. Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions. Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Preparation In this assessment, you will base your Patient-Centered Care Report on the scenario presented in the Evidence-Based Health Evaluation and Application media piece. Some of the writing you completed and exported from the media piece should serve as pre-writing for this assessment and inform the final draft of your report. Even though the media piece presented only one type of care setting, you can extrapolate individualized care decisions, based on population health improvement initiative outcomes, to other settings.

Requirements Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant evidence from 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources to support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Attach a reference list to your report. Capella FP6016 Full Course Work 2019

Report Content Address the following points in a 4–6 page report: Evaluate the expected outcomes of the population health improvement initiative that were, and were not, achieved. Describe the outcomes that were achieved, their positive effects on the community’s health, and any variance across demographic groups. Describe the outcomes that were not achieved, the extent to which they fell short of expectations, and any variance across demographic groups. Identify the factors (for example: institutional, community, environmental, resources, communication) that may have contributed to any achievement shortfalls. Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of the population health improvement initiative, or ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Describe the corrective measures you would take to address the factors that may have contributed to achievement shortfalls. Cite the evidence (from similar projects, research, or professional organization resources) that supports the corrective measures you are proposing. Explain how the evidence illustrates the likelihood of improved outcomes if your proposed strategy is enacted Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from the population health improvement initiative outcomes.

Explain how the outcomes and lessons learned informed the decisions you made in your approach for personalizing care for the patient with a health condition related to the population health concern addressed in the improvement initiative. Ensure that your approach to personalizing care for the individual patient addresses the patient’s: Individual health needs. Economic and environmental realities. Culture and family. Incorporate the best available evidence (from both the population health improvement initiative and other relevant sources) to inform your approach and actions you intend to take. Justify the value and relevance of evidence you used to support your approach to personalizing care for your patient. Explain why your evidence is valuable and relevant to your patient’s case. Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate for both the health issue you are trying to correct and for the unique situation of your patient and their family. Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of your approach to personalizing patient care. Ensure that your framework includes measurable criteria that are relevant to your desired outcomes. Explain why the criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success. Identify the specific aspects of your approach that are most likely to be transferable to other individual cases. Capella FP6016 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP6016 Assessment 2

Capella FP6016 Assessment 2 Deliver a 5–7-page analysis of an existing quality improvement initiative at your workplace. The QI initiative you choose to analyze should be related to specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. Too often, discussions about quality health care, care costs, and outcome measures take place in isolation—each group talking among themselves about results and enhancements. Because nurses are critical to the delivery of high-quality, efficient health care, it is essential that they develop the proficiency to review, evaluate performance reports, and be able to effectively communicate outcome measures related to quality initiatives. The nursing staff’s perspective and the need to collaborate on quality care initiatives are fundamental to patient safety and positive institutional health care outcomes. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance. Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative. Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.

Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting. Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures. Competency 4: Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost effectiveness, and work-life quality Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes. Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care. Communicate evaluation and analysis in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Capella FP6016 Assessment 2

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Preparation

You have been asked to prepare and deliver an analysis of an existing quality improvement initiative at your workplace. The QI initiative you choose to analyze should be related to a specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. The purpose of the report is to assess whether specific quality indicators point to improved patient safety, quality of care, cost and efficiency goals, and other desired metrics. Your target audience consists of nurses and other health professionals with specializations or interest in your selected condition, disease, or issue. In your report, you will define the disease, analyze how the condition is managed, identify the core performance measurements used to treat or manage the condition, and evaluate the impact of the quality indicators on the health care facility: Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version of your analysis for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service. The numbered points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. The bullets below each grading criterion further delineate tasks to fulfill the assessment requirements. Be sure that your Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation addresses all of the content below. You may also want to read the scoring guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion.

Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting. Evaluate a QI initiative and explain what prompted the implementation. Detail problems that were not addressed and any issues that arose from the initiative. Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures. Analyze the benchmarks that were used to evaluate success. Detail what was the most successful, as well as what outcome measures are missing or could be added. Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to initiative functionality and outcomes. Integrate the perspectives of interprofessional team members involved in the initiative. Detail who you talked to, their professions, and the impact of their perspectives on your analysis. Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand quality outcomes of a quality initiative. Recommend specific process or protocol changes as well as added technologies that would improve quality outcomes. Communicate evaluation and analysis in a professional and effective manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

Submission Requirements

Length of submission: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages. Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources (no older than seven years, unless seminal work) of scholarly peer reviewed or professional evidence that support your interpretation and analysis. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.

Capella FP6011 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP6011 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP6011 Assessment 1

Create an evidence-based, patient-centered concept map that illustrates an individualized approach to patient care, based on a patient case file of your choice. Evidence-based practice is a key skill in the toolkit of the master’s-prepared nurse. Its goal is to ensure that health care practitioners are using the best available evidence to ensure that patients are receiving the best care possible (Godshall, M., 2015.). In essence, evidence-based practice is all about ensuring quality care. In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply evidence-based practice and personalized care concepts to ensure quality care and improve the health of a single patient. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care. Analyze the needs of a patient, and those of their family, with regard to how they will influence a patient-centered concept map. Design an individualized, patient-centered concept map, based upon the best available evidence for treating a patient’s specific health, economic, and cultural needs.

Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions. Propose relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the outcomes of a patient-centered concept map. Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision. Justify the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a patient-centered concept map. Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions. Develop a strategy for communicating with patients and their families in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Capella FP6011 Full Course Work 2019 Reference Godshall, M. (2015). Fast facts for evidence-based practice in nursing: Implementing EBP in a nutshell (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

Preparation You have been presented with a number of patient case files in the Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Care media piece. You reviewed each case, selected one case for further research, and created draft evidence-based concept map to illustrate an approach to individualized care for the patient. In this assessment, you will build upon and refine your draft concept map and develop a supporting narrative. Create your concept map and narrative as separate documents. Be sure to note the areas where you need to include your evidence-based support and where you need to make clear your strategies for communicating information to the patient and the patient’s family. Note: Many organizations use the spider style of concept maps (see the Taylor & Littleton-Kearney article for an example). Also, if a specific style of concept map is used in your current care setting, you may use it in this assessment. Create your concept map and narrative as separate documents. Be sure to note the areas where you need to include your evidence-based support and where you need to make clear your strategies for communicating information to the patient and the patient’s family.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Requirements Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Supporting Evidence and APA Style Integrate relevant evidence from 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources to support your assertions. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Attach a reference list to your narrative. Concept Map Develop a concept map for the individual patient, based upon the best available evidence for treating your patient’s health, economic, and cultural needs. Narrative Develop a narrative (2–4 pages) for your concept map. Analyze the needs of your patient and their family, and determine how those needs will influence a patient-centered concept map. Consider how your patient’s economic situation and relevant environmental factors may have contributed to your patient’s current condition or affect their future health. Consider how your patient’s culture or family should influence your concept map. Justify the value and relevance of the evidence you used as the basis of your concept map. Explain why your evidence is valuable and relevant to your patient’s case. Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate for both the health issue you are trying to correct and for the unique situation of your patient and their family. Propose relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the degree to which the desired outcomes of your concept map were achieved. Explain why your proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success. Explain how you will communicate specific aspects of the concept map to your patient and their family in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Ensure that your strategies: Promote honest communications. Facilitate sharing only the information you are required and permitted to share. Are mindful of your patient’s culture. Enable you to make complex medical terms and concepts understandable to your patient and their family, regardless of language, disabilities, or level of education.

Additional Requirements Be sure to include both documents when you submit your assessment. Capella FP6011 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP6011 Assessment 2

Develop a population health improvement plan, based on your evaluation of the best available demographic, environmental, and epidemiological data, that focuses on your diagnosis of a widespread population health issue. Part of effectively engaging in evidence-based practice is the ability to synthesize raw health data with research studies and other relevant information in the literature. This will enable you to develop sound interventions, initiatives, and outcomes to address health concerns that you find in data during the course of your practice. In this assessment, you have an opportunity to evaluate community demographic, environmental, and epidemiological data to diagnose a widespread population health issue, which will be the focus of a health improvement plan that you develop. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health. Evaluate community demographic, epidemiological, and environmental data to diagnose widespread population health issues. Develop an ethical health improvement plan to address a population health issue within a community. Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions. Propose criteria for evaluating population health improvement plan outcomes. Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision. Justify the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a population health improvement plan. Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions. Develop a strategy for communicating with colleagues and members of the community in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Preparation Your organization is undertaking a population health improvement initiative focused on one of the pervasive and chronic health concerns in the local community. Examples of health improvement initiatives include nationwide concerns, such as type 2 diabetes, HIV, obesity, and Zika. However, your organization has asked you to determine which widespread health concern should be addressed in a population health improvement plan for the community in which you practice and has entrusted you with gathering and evaluating the relevant data.

Requirements Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Data Evaluation Evaluate community demographic, epidemiological, and environmental data. Identify the relevant data. Describe the major community health concerns suggested by the data. Explain how environmental factors affect the health of community residents.

Health Improvement Plan Develop an ethical health improvement plan that effectively addresses the population health concern that you identified in your evaluation of the relevant data. Base your plan on the best available evidence from a minimum of 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Attach a reference list to your plan. Ensure that your plan meets the cultural and environmental needs of your community and will likely lead to some improvement in the community’s health related to this concern. Consider the environmental realities and challenges that exist in the community. Address potential barriers or misunderstandings related to the various cultures prevalent in the community. Justify the value and relevance of the evidence you used as the basis of your plan. Explain why the evidence is valuable and relevant to the community health concern you are addressing. Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate and informs the goal of improving the health of the community. Propose relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the outcomes of your plan. Explain why your proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success. Explain how you will communicate with colleagues and members of the community, in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way, with regard to the development and implementation of your plan. Develop a clear communications strategy mindful of the cultural and ethical expectations of colleagues and community members regarding data privacy. Ensure that your strategy enables you to make complex medical terms and concepts understandable to members of the community, regardless of language, disabilities, or level of education. Capella FP6011 Full Course Work 2019

Capella FP6011 Assessment 3

Write a report on the application of population health improvement initiative outcomes to patient-centered care, based on information presented in an interactive multimedia scenario. In this assessment, you have an opportunity to apply the tenets of evidence-based practice in both patient-centered care and population health improvement contexts. You will be challenged to think critically, evaluate what the evidence suggests is an appropriate approach to personalizing patient care, and determine what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: Competency 1: Apply evidence-based practice to plan patient-centered care. Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative. Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative. Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health. Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative, or for ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions. Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of an approach to personalizing patient care and determining what aspects of the approach could be applied to similar situations and patients. Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision. Justify the value and relevance of evidence used to support an approach to personalizing patient care. Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions. Write clearly and logically, with correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Preparation In this assessment, you will base your Patient-Centered Care Report on the scenario presented in the Evidence-Based Health Evaluation and Application media piece. Some of the writing you completed and exported from the media piece should serve as pre-writing for this assessment and inform the final draft of your report. Even though the media piece presented only one type of care setting, you can extrapolate individualized care decisions, based on population health improvement initiative outcomes, to other settings.

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Requirements Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style Write clearly and logically, using correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant evidence from 3–5 current scholarly or professional sources to support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references. Attach a reference list to your report. Report Content Address the following points in a 4–6 page report: Evaluate the expected outcomes of the population health improvement initiative that were, and were not, achieved. Describe the outcomes that were achieved, their positive effects on the community’s health, and any variance across demographic groups. Describe the outcomes that were not achieved, the extent to which they fell short of expectations, and any variance across demographic groups. Identify the factors (for example: institutional, community, environmental, resources, communication) that may have contributed to any achievement shortfalls. Propose a strategy for improving the outcomes of the population health improvement initiative, or ensuring that all outcomes are being addressed, based on the best available evidence. Describe the corrective measures you would take to address the factors that may have contributed to achievement shortfalls. Cite the evidence (from similar projects, research, or professional organization resources) that supports the corrective measures you are proposing. Explain how the evidence illustrates the likelihood of improved outcomes if your proposed strategy is enacted Develop an approach to personalizing patient care that incorporates lessons learned from the population health improvement initiative outcomes.

Explain how the outcomes and lessons learned informed the decisions you made in your approach for personalizing care for the patient with a health condition related to the population health concern addressed in the improvement initiative. Ensure that your approach to personalizing care for the individual patient addresses the patient’s: Individual health needs. Economic and environmental realities. Culture and family. Incorporate the best available evidence (from both the population health improvement initiative and other relevant sources) to inform your approach and actions you intend to take. Justify the value and relevance of evidence you used to support your approach to personalizing care for your patient. Explain why your evidence is valuable and relevant to your patient’s case. Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate for both the health issue you are trying to correct and for the unique situation of your patient and their family. Propose a framework for evaluating the outcomes of your approach to personalizing patient care. Ensure that your framework includes measurable criteria that are relevant to your desired outcomes. Explain why the criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success. Identify the specific aspects of your approach that are most likely to be transferable to other individual cases.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – FP6011 Full Course

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. FP6011 Full Course

• Guarantee
  

• Zero Plagiarism
• On-time delivery
• A-Grade Papers
• Free Revision
• 24/7 Support
• 100% Confidentiality
• Professional Writers

• Services Offered

• Custom paper writing
• Question and answers
• Essay paper writing
• Editing and proofreading
• Plagiarism removal services
• Multiple answer questions

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, affordable, plagiarism-free paper

Capella FPX4010 Assessment 1

Capella FPX4010 Assessment 1

For this assessment you will create a 5-10 minute video reflection on an experience in which you collaborated interprofessionally, as well as a brief discussion of an interprofessional collaboration scenario and how it could have been better approached.

Interprofessional collaboration is a critical aspect of a nurse’s work. Through interprofessional collaboration, practitioners and patients share information and consider each other’s perspectives to better understand and address the many factors that contribute to health and well-being (Sullivan et al., 2015). Essentially, by collaborating, health care practitioners and patients can have better health outcomes. Nurses, who are often at the frontlines of interacting with various groups and records, are full partners in this approach to health care.

Reflection is a key part of building interprofessional competence, as it allows you to look critically at experiences and actions through specific lenses. From the standpoint of interprofessional collaboration, reflection can help you consider potential reasons for and causes of people’s actions and behaviors (Saunders et al., 2016). It also can provide opportunities to examine the roles team members adopted in a given situation as well as how the team could have worked more effectively.

References

Saunders, R., Singer, R., Dugmore, H., Seaman, K., & Lake, F. (2016). Nursing students’ reflections on an interprofessional placement in ambulatory care. Reflective Practice, 17(4), 393–402.

Sullivan, M., Kiovsky, R., Mason, D., Hill, C., & Duke, C. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration and education. American Journal of Nursing, 115(3), 47–54.

Demonstration of Proficiency

Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.

Identify how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources supported by evidence from the literature.

Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.

Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.

Identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team to achieve its goals and work more effectively together.

Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.

Identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature, which would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals.

Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.

Communicate in a professional manner that is easily audible and uses proper grammar. Format reference list in current APA style. Capella FPX4010 Assessment 1

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Professional Context

This assessment will help you to become a reflective practitioner. By considering your own successes and shortcomings in interprofessional collaboration, you will increase awareness of your problem-solving abilities. You will create a video of your reflections, including a discussion of best practices of interprofessional collaboration and leadership strategies, cited in the literature.

Scenario

As part of an initiative to build effective collaboration at your Vila Health site, where you are a nurse, you have been asked to reflect on a project or experience in which you collaborated interprofessionally and examine what happened during the collaboration, identifying positive aspects and areas for improvement.

You have also been asked to review a series of events that took place at another Vila Health location and research interprofessional collaboration best practices and use the lessons learned from your experiences to make recommendations for improving interprofessional collaboration among their team. Your task is to create a 5–10 minute video reflection with suggestions for the Vila Health team that can be shared with leadership as well as Vila Health colleagues at your site. Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact [email protected].edu to request accommodations. If, for some reason, you are unable to record a video, please contact your faculty member as soon as possible to explore options for completing the assessment.

Instructions

Using Kaltura, record a 5–10 minute video reflection on an interprofessional collaboration experience from your personal practice, proposing suggestions on how to improve the collaboration presented in the Vila Health: Collaboration for Change activity.

Be sure that your assessment addresses the following criteria. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you will know what is needed for a distinguished score:

Reflect on an interdisciplinary collaboration experience, noting ways in which it was successful and unsuccessful in achieving desired outcomes.

Identify how poor collaboration can result in inefficient management of human and financial resources, citing supporting evidence from the literature.

Identify best-practice leadership strategies from the literature that would improve an interdisciplinary team’s ability to achieve its goals, citing at least one author from the literature.

Identify best-practice interdisciplinary collaboration strategies to help a team achieve its goals and work together, citing the work of at least one author.

Communicate in a professional manner, is easily audible, and uses proper grammar. Format reference list in current APA style.

You will need to relate an experience that you have had collaborating on a project. This could be at your current or former place of practice, or another relevant project that will enable you to address the requirements. In addition to describing your experience, you should explain aspects of the collaboration that helped the team make progress toward relevant goals or outcomes, as well as aspects of the collaboration that could have been improved.

A simplified gap-analysis approach may be useful:

What happened?
What went well?
What did not go well?
What should have happened?

After your personal reflection, examine the scenario in the Vila Health activity and discuss the ways in which the interdisciplinary team did not collaborate effectively and the negative implications for the human and financial resources of the interdisciplinary team and the organization as a whole.

Building on this investigation, identify at least one leadership best practice or strategy that you believe would improve the team’s ability to achieve their goals. Be sure to identify the strategy and its source or author and provide a brief rationale for your choice of strategy.

Additionally, identify at least one interdisciplinary collaboration best practice or strategy to help the team achieve its goals and work more effectively together. Again, identify the strategy, its source, and reasons why you think it will be effective.

You are encouraged to integrate lessons learned from your self-reflection to support and enrich your discussion of the Vila Health activity.

You are required to submit an APA-formatted reference list for any sources that you cited specifically in your video or used to inform your presentation. The Example Kaltura Reflection will show you how to cite scholarly sources in the context of an oral presentation.

Refer to the Campus tutorial Using Kaltura [PDF] as needed to record and upload your reflection.

Additional Requirements

References: Cite at least 3 professional or scholarly sources of evidence to support the assertions you make in your video. Include additional properly cited references as necessary to support your statements.
APA Reference Page: Submit a correctly formatted APA reference page that shows all the sources you used to create and deliver your video.
You may wish to refer to the Campus APA Module for more information on applying APA style. FPX4010 Assessment 1