PSY FPX 8711 Assessment 3 Outline of a Coaching Plan

Assessment 3 Outline of a Coaching Plan

Name

Capella university

PSY FPX 8711 Principles of Industrial/Organizational Psychology

Prof. Name

Date

Proposal for Pre-Employment Screening and Structured Interview

Introduction

We are delighted to present this proposal to implement pre-employment screening tests and a structured interview process for evaluating candidates for the Training and Development Specialist position. The primary aim of this proposal is to address the critical need for accurately assessing candidates for this pivotal role within your organization.

Objectives

1. Effective Candidate Assessment: Develop a comprehensive strategy to assess candidates for the Training and Development Specialist position.
2. Identification of Positive Attributes: Employ tests to identify positive attributes indicative of outstanding performance (Landy & Confe, 2016).
3. Structured Interview Process: Implement a structured interview based on job analysis to evaluate candidates’ responses to hypothetical scenarios.

Solution

1. Sixteen Personality Factor, Fifth Edition (16PF-5): Utilize the 16PF-5 as a valuable tool for pre-employment screening to assess personality traits relevant to job performance.
2. Wonderlic Personnel Test (WPT): Incorporate the WPT, a widely recognized measure of general cognitive ability, to evaluate candidates’ problem-solving skills, learning aptitude, and job satisfaction (Wonderlic, 2019).
3. Work Sample and Simulation: Introduce work samples and simulations to assess specific knowledge and skills crucial for the Training and Development Specialist role.
4. Structured Interview: Conduct a structured interview based on job analysis to gauge candidates’ responses to job-related scenarios and challenges.

Rationale and Benefits

This proposal offers a strategic approach to selecting the most suitable candidate for the Training and Development Specialist role, thereby saving time, costs, and enhancing productivity in the long term. By leveraging validated assessment methods recommended by Industrial and Organizational psychologists, we ensure the selection of candidates who possess the requisite attributes for success in the role (SIOP, 2019).

PSY FPX 8711 Assessment 3 Outline of a Coaching Plan

Conclusion

Selecting the right candidate for the Training and Development Specialist position is paramount for the future success of your organization. By accepting this proposal, you gain access to a robust battery of assessments designed to identify candidates best suited for the role.

References

Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K. S., & Cattell, H. E. P. (1949). Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, Fifth Edition. Retrieved from Landy, F. J., & Conte, J. M. (2013). Work in the 21st century: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

PSY FPX 8711 Assessment 3 Outline of a Coaching Plan

Occupational Information Network (O*NET). (2019). Summary report for training and development specialist. Retrieved from [link]. Wonderlic, E. F. (1989). Wonderlic Personnel Test. Retrieved from [link].

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – PSY FPX 8711 Assessment 3 Outline of a Coaching Plan

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – PSY FPX 8711 Assessment 3 Outline of a Coaching Plan

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. PSY FPX 8711 Assessment 3 Outline of a Coaching Plan

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. PSY FPX 8711 Assessment 3 Outline of a Coaching Plan

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper